Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome With Glucosteroids: The Guangzhou Experience (original) (raw)

Abstract

Study objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of corticosteroid therapy in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients.

Design

Four hundred one of 1,278 SARS cases treated in Guangzhou China between December 2002 and June 2003 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria issued by the World Health Organization for confirmed identification of SARS. Among them, the diagnosis of critical SARS was defined by criteria of SARS guidelines incorporated with a low oxygenation index (OI) [< 300 mm Hg]. Data of these patients retrieved from a database were retrospectively analyzed by logistic regression and Cox regression for the effect of corticosteroid therapy on death, hospitalization days, and complication presentation.

Results

Among the 401 SARS patients studied, 147 of 249 noncritical patients (59.0%) received corticosteroids (mean daily dose, 105.3 ± 86.1 mg) [± SD], and all survived the disease; 121 of 152 critical patients (79.6%) received corticosteroids at a mean daily dose of 133.5 ± 102.3 mg, and 25 died. Analysis of these 401 confirmed cases did not show any benefits of corticosteroid on the death rate and hospitalization days. However, when focused on 152 critical SARS cases, factors correlated with these end points indicated by univariate analysis included use of corticosteroid, age, rigor at onset, secondary respiratory infections, pulmonary rales, grading of OI, and use of invasive ventilation. After adjustment for possible confounders, treatment with corticosteroid was shown contributing to lower overall mortality, instant mortality, and shorter hospitalization stay (p < 0.05). Incidence of complications was significantly associated with the need for invasive ventilation but not with use of corticosteroids.

Conclusion

This Guangzhou retrospective study revealed that proper use of corticosteroid in confirmed critical SARS resulted in lowered mortality and shorter hospitalization stay, and was not associated with significant secondary lower respiratory infection and other complications.

Key words: complication, corticosteroid, mortality, SARS

Abbreviations: ALI, acute lung injury; AVN, avascular osteonecrosis; CI, confidence interval; IL, interleukin; IP-10, interferon-inducible protein 10; OI, oxygenation index; OR, odds ratio; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus

The epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), an emerging infectious respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus,1 started in Guangdong Province, China in November 2002 and swept over 31 countries and regions worldwide, accounting for a cumulative number of 8,098 infected cases and 774 deaths (case fatality, 9.56% as reported on January 24, 2004).2 With regards to the treatment of SARS, no specific approaches so far are available. Glucocorticosteroid administration for acute lung injury (ALI) or ARDS arising from critical SARS remains controversial, as does for ALI or ARDS arising from other etiologies. Many studies have looked into the use of corticosteroids in SARS management in terms of efficacy, duration, dose, and severe adverse events; however, further investigations are needed to characterize the treatment efficacy and safety profiles of steroids in this condition.3 Some authors4, 5, 6 implied that large-dose steroids were indicated during the early phase once a diagnosis was made, to prevent further deterioration, while some others7, 8, 9 thought that large-dose therapy was not advisable although steroids could help. Open clinical trials6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 also demonstrated that pulse steroid therapy could reduce mortality without associating an increased rate of life-threatening complications. Unfortunately, all of these studies are self-controlling based; therefore, they are not convincing due to lack of control groups in study design, as the natural history and progression of SARS were yet unclear at time of study.

In Guangzhou, Guangdong Province of China, the city where SARS epidemic first broke out, the condition had been managed as community-acquired pneumonia before SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was confirmed as the pathogen. When complicated with ALI, some patients were administered steroids empirically based on treatment of ALI/ARDS arising otherwise, other than on any available evidences or guidelines. The time has arrived when efficacy and safety profiles of steroid therapy have to be reviewed with more recent data. In this study, we set up a database of Guangzhou SARS cases and evaluated SARS-related steroid therapy through a retrospective study, expecting to characterize the efficacy and safety profiles of steroid therapy in Guangzhou by multivariate analysis.

Materials and Methods

Patient Inclusion

From December 2002 through June 2003, there were 1,278 registered cases of clinically diagnosed SARS admitted to hospitals in Guangzhou, China, among which we screened for those strictly fulfilling the criteria issued by the World Health Organization for confirmed identification of SARS,15 and also with at least one of the following conditions: (1) seroconversion or a fourfold rise (or higher) in SARS-IgG during days 10 to 14 or later after onset; (2) a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result for SARS-CoV confirmed by two or more laboratories during acute phase. Four hundred one of the 1,278 patients met the criteria and were enrolled in this study.

Method

Database Setup

The case records of all SARS patients were reviewed by our investigators and input into a database (Excel; Microsoft; Redmond, WA) statistically designed with uniform fields including patient demographic data, contact history, etiologic investigations, SARS-IgG, SARS-PCR, underlying diseases, symptoms and signs, chest radiography, laboratory investigations, complications, medications and interventions, prognosis, and cause of death.

Evaluation of Chest Radiography

Each side of lung field was divided into 9 zones by anatomic thirds from upper to lower and from lateral to medial parts, such that there were 18 zones in total on both sides.16 Each zone was scored 1 through 4 based on the degrees of pulmonary opacities (1 = hazy, 2 = medium density, 3 = high density, 4 = consolidation), and the sum of these 18 subscores was defined as the total score for pulmonary abnormalities in radiography. Then the total score of pulmonary abnormalities was compared with the previous chest radiograph to determine the tendency of chest radiography abnormality. The tendency of chest radiography abnormality was classified as progressed (1 = 25% increase in total score), stable (2 = < 25% change in total score), and improved (3 = 25% reduction in total score). Two senior radiologists evaluated and scored the chest radiographs independently and contributed to the mean total radiographic score for each case.

Recognition of the Onset

Day 1 of the disease was marked by the first time of fever as reported by the patient or confirmed by measurement.

Calculation of the Steroid Doses

Corticosteroid therapy in our study included aggressive treatment for critical patients and rescue regimen for worsened cases. The dosage of steroids was calculated only up to week 3 from onset in an attempt to circumvent calculation of rescue use of very high dosage of corticosteroid before the death of the patients. We defined the rescue use of corticosteroid as the sudden increase of dosage after 3 weeks from the onset and 3 days before the patients died. In this way of calculation, we were able to include 87.3% of the total dosage of corticosteroid and avoid four cases of rescue use of corticosteroid with daily dosage from 1,000 to 2,000 mg of methylprednisolone. Methylprednisolone was the major steroid used in most of the patients, while a small percentage were treated with hydroprednisone or dexamethasone, the doses of which were converted into methylprednisolone equivalents by 25 mg of hydroprednisone/4 mg of methylprednisolone and 0.75 mg of dexamethasone/4 mg of methylprednisolone.

Recognition of Complications

Complications in our study referred to those occurring during the course of treatment and associated with progression of SARS or treatment interventions. Major complications included pneumothorax, mediastinal emphysema, myocardial injury, arrhythmias, hyperglycemia, high BP, hypokalemia, secondary lower respiratory or extrapulmonary infections, and GI tract hemorrhage.

Recognition of Secondary Lower Respiratory Infections

Secondary lower respiratory infections in the SARS patients were recognized when one of the following was met: (1) histologic evidence of bacterial or fungal infections in lungs; (2) presentation of pneumonia, with pathogen isolated from blood or pleural effusion identical to result of sputum culture; (3) after 2 weeks in the time course of SARS, under the condition of resolution of fever, significant clinical improvement and obvious resolution on chest radiograph, recurrence of fever, cough, and sputum as well as newly development of lung infiltrate on chest radiograph were observed; and (4) apparent purulent sputum, leukocytosis, and confirmed pathogen in sputum by two consecutive culture findings.17, 18

Recognition of Myocardial Injury

Myocardial injury was referred to as one time or above increase in creatinine kinase-MB.

Recognition of Extrapulmonary Infection

The criteria for the determining secondary extrapulmonary infection were as follows: (1) bacteria or fungi infection in a site other than lower respiratory tract proved by pathology; (2) same isolate of two consecutive culture findings from extrapulmonary fluid.

Determining Baseline Values (Before Corticosteroid Use) of Time-Dependent Variables Between Steroid- and Nonsteroid-Treated Groups

The method of determining baseline values of all time-dependent variables of a patient were as follows: (1) for a steroid-treated patient, the median of daily recorded values during the 3 days prior to his/her first steroid dosage; or (2) for a nonsteroid-treated patient, the median of daily recorded values during the 3 days prior to a specific day, which was the median of the length of time from disease onset to the first steroid dosage among all steroid-treated patients.

Definition of Critical SARS

The diagnosis of critical SARS was made according to the criteria of SARS guidelines issued by Ministry of Public Health of China,19 incorporating a low oxygenation index (OI) [< 300 mm Hg]. In other words, SARS manifestations matching those of ALI were diagnosed as critical SARS; cases otherwise were deemed noncritical.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical software (SPSS 11.0; SPSS; Chicago, IL) was employed for statistical analysis. Measurement data were summarized by mean ± SD. Analysis of variance and χ2 test were used for univariate testing, while forward stepwise (conditional) logistic regression and Cox regression were used for multivariate analysis. Primary end points were death caused by SARS and hospital discharge of the survivors. All variables possibly affecting the primary end points were included in univariate analysis to screen for potential confounders, which were further processed in logistic regression and Cox regression. The significance level α in univariate analysis was set at 0.1 so that some variables might not be overlooked during this stage. The use of steroid was further evaluated for its relationship with case fatality and hospitalization days with a significance level α = 0.05. In analysis concerned with hospitalization days, only those survival cases were used to avoid the confounding effect of death.

Results

General Characteristics of the Patients

There were 249 noncritical and 152 critical cases among 401 enrolled SARS patients. General characteristics of the patients were shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

General Characteristics of the Patients Between Noncritical and Critical SARS*

Characteristics Total (n = 401) Noncritical (n = 249) Critical (n = 152) Statistics p Value
Age, yr 34.74 ± 13.31 31.51 ± 11.38 40.02 ± 14.55 Z = − 6.391† 0.000
Male/female gender, No. 129/272 61/188 68/84 χ2(1) = 17.717‡ 0.000
Deaths 25 (6.23) 0 (0) 25 (16.45) χ2(1) = 43.677‡ 0.000
Patients receiving steroids 268 (66.83) 147 (59.04) 121 (79.61) χ2(1) = 18.015‡ 0.000
Median (IQR) of accumulative dose, mg 1,868.06 (2,132) 1,372.18 (1,430) 2,470.48 (3,080) Z = − 3.559† 0.000
Median (IQR) of mean daily dose, mg 131.41 (102.98) 105.27 (88.34) 163.17 (162.86) Z = − 3.912† 0.000
Time of initiation of corticosteroid therapy, d from the onset of SARS 5.01 ± 3.48 5.12 ± 3.36 4.92 ± 3.57 Z = − 0.468† 0.642
Use of invasive ventilation 37 (9.23) 5 (2.01) 32 (21.05) χ2(1) = 40.872‡ 0.000
Median (IQR) of time from onset to hospitalization, d 3 (4) 3 (3) 3 (5) Z = − 1.311† 0.191
Temperature, °C 38.53 ± 0.94 38.11 ± 0.86 39.23 ± 0.58 t(399) = − 14.210§ 0.000
Duration of fever, d 11.70 ± 2.94 11.23 ± 3.08 12.47 ± 2.53 Z = − 3.991(1) 0.000
Myalgia 125 (31.17) 70 (28.11) 55 (36.18) χ2(1) = 2.866‡ 0.090
Cough and expectoration 98 (24.44) 56 (22.49) 42 (27.63) χ2(1) = 1.351‡ 0.245
Dyspnea 140 (34.91) 61 (24.50) 79 (51.97) χ2(1) = 31.356‡ 0.000
Respiratory rate, breaths/min 25.45 ± 5.92 22.59 ± 2.60 29.87 ± 6.94 t(399) = −14.677(3) 0.000
Peripheral counts of WBCs, × 109/L 7.08 ± 3.99 7.15 ± 4.44 6.96 ± 3.08 Z = − 0.420(1) 0.644
Neutrophils/WBCs 0.62 ± 0.16 0.63 ± 0.16 0.60 ± 0.16 t(399) = 1.695§ 0.091
Lymphocytes, × 109/L 0.19 ± 0.10 0.19 ± 0.11 0.18 ± 0.09 Z = − 1.763† 0.077
Serum lactate dehydrogenase, IU/L 253.32 ± 133.68 219.82 ± 95.80 310.63 ± 166.69 Z = − 4.056† 0.000
Peripheral oxygen saturation, % 96.09 ± 3.12 96.91 ± 1.62 95.10 ± 4.07 t(399) = 4.379§ 0.000
Heart rate, beats/min 103.77 ± 37.52 107.89 ± 38.14 99.89 ± 36.73 Z = −1.342† 0.180
Pao2, mm Hg 99.25 ± 32.53 106.59 ± 32.44 92.83 ± 31.43 Z = − 2.733† 0.010
Paco2, mm Hg 32.04 ± 7.20 32.08 ± 6.19 31.98 ± 8.46 t(399) = 0.081§ 0.935
Inhaled oxygen concentration 0.34 ± 0.13 0.29 ± 0.05 0.39 ± 0.15 Z = − 6.536† 0.000
Tendency of chest radiograph abnormalities
1 (deteriorating) 382 (95.26) 232 (93.17) 150 (98.68) Fisher exact test 0.019
2 (stable) 17 (4.24) 15 (6.02) 2 (1.32)
3 (improving) 2 (0.50) 2 (0.80) 0 (0.00)
Rigor at onset 194 (48.4) 106 (42.57) 88 (57.89) χ2(1) = 8.875‡ 0.003
Pulmonary rales 112 (27.93) 82 (31.66) 30 (19.74) χ2(1) = 8.164‡ 0.004
OI grading
1, < 100 14 (3.5) 0 (0) 14 (9.2) Fisher exact test 0.000
2, ≥ 100 to < 200 37 (9.2) 0 (0) 37 (24.3)
3, ≥ 200 to < 300 101 (25.2) 0 (0) 101 (66.4)
4, ≥ 300 249 (62.1) 249 (100) 0 (0)
Underlying disease∥ 89 (22.19) 43 (17.27) 46 (30.26) χ2(1) = 9.229‡ 0.002
Complications 202 (50.37) 90 (36.14) 112 (73.68) χ2(1) = 53.206‡ 0.000
Pneumothorax 6 (1.50) 0 (0) 6 (3.95) Fisher exact test 0.003
Mediastinal emphysema 14 (3.49) 0 (0) 14 (9.21) χ2(1) = 23.764‡ 0.000
Shock 8 (2.00) 0 (0) 8 (5.26) Fisher exact test 0.000
Disseminated intravascular coagulation 10 (2.49) 0 (0) 10 (6.58) Fisher exact test 0.000
Renal dysfunction# 19 (4.74) 3 (1.20) 16 (10.53) χ2(1) = 18.169‡ 0.000
Liver dysfunction** 121 (30.17) 59 (23.69) 62 (40.79) χ2(1) = 13.091‡ 0.000
Myocardial injury†† 32 (7.98) 5 (2.01) 27 (17.76) χ2(1) = 31.905‡ 0.000
Arrhythmias 15 (3.74) 2 (0.80) 13 (8.55) χ2(1) = 15.742‡ 0.000
Secondary pulmonary infection 41 (10.22) 4 (1.61) 37 (24.34) χ2(1) = 53.152‡ 0.000
Extrapulmonary infection 5 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 5 (3.29) Fisher exact test 0.008
Multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome 11 (2.74) 0 (0) 11 (7.24) Fisher exact test 0.000
GI hemorrhage 9 (2.24) 0 (0) 9 (5.92) Fisher exact test 0.000
Others 1 (0.25) 1 (0.40) 0 (0) Fisher exact test 1.000

Use of Steroids

Steroid therapy for SARS patients in Guangzhou was heterogeneous, with 59.0% of noncritical patients and 79.6% of critical patients receiving steroids, and the time to initiate the first steroid dosage in all steroid-treated patients was 5.01 ± 3.48 days from disease onset.

Risk Factors for Death and Duration of Hospitalization and Effects of Steroids

There were 25 deaths in 152 critical SARS cases. All of the 249 noncritical patients survived the disease. The risk factors related to death and the days of hospitalization were analyzed.

Univariate Analysis

The candidate risk factors were found by univariate analysis through comparison between the noncritical and critical cases and between the survivors and deaths of critical cases (Table 1, Table 2).

Table 3.

General Characteristics of the Patients Between Survivors and Deaths Among 152 Critical Cases*

Characteristics Survivors (n = 127) Deaths (n = 25) Statistics p Value
Age, yr 37.23 ± 12.62 54.20 ± 15.64 Z = − 4.788† 0.000
Male/female gender, No. 55/72 13/12 χ2(1) = 0.638‡ 0.424
Patients receiving steroids 103 (81.10) 18 (72.00) χ2(1) = 1.066‡ 0.302
Median (IQR) of accumulative dose, mg 2,225.13 (2,912) 3,874.42 (5,920) Z = − 2.522† 0.012
Median (IQR) of mean daily dose, mg 148.1 (111.43) 248.91 (198.33) Z = − 2.750† 0.006
Time of initiation of corticosteroid therapy, d from the onset of SARS 4.90 ± 3.67 5.04 ± 3.12 Z = − 0.289† 0.855
Use of invasive ventilation 11 (8.66) 21 (84.00) χ2(1) = 71.333‡ 0.000
Median ( IQR) of time to hospitalization, d 3 (5) 4 (4) Z = − 1.180† 0.238
Temperature, °C 39.26 ± 0.58 39.05 ± 0.57 t(150) = 1.685§ 0.094
Duration of fever, d 12.22 ± 2.33 13.76 ± 3.09 t(150) = − 2.850§ 0.005
Myalgia 49 (38.58) 6 (24.00) χ2(1) = 1.924‡ 0.165
Cough and expectoration 31 (24.41) 11 (44.00) χ2(1) = 4.009‡ 0.045
Dyspnea 65 (51.18) 14 (56.00) χ2(1) = 0.194‡ 0.659
Respiratory rate, breaths/min 29.37 ± 6.99 32.40 ± 5.53 Z = − 2.336† 0.022
Peripheral counts of WBCs, × 109/L 6.56 ± 2.80 8.92 ± 3.63 Z = − 2.655† 0.008
Neutrophils/WBCs 0.57 ± 0.15 0.72 ± 0.17 t(150) = −3.885§ 0.000
Lymphocytes, × 109/L 0.18 ± 0.09 0.15 ± 0.09 Z = − 1.308† 0.191
Serum lactate dehydrogenase, IU/L 292.29 ± 141.94 391.86 ± 238.85 Z = − 2.029† 0.043
Peripheral oxygen saturation, % 95.18 ± 3.97 94.78 ± 4.53 t(150) = − 0.419§ 0.676
Heart rate, beats/min 102.89 ± 12.33 127.24 ± 17.60 t(150) = − 6.606§ 0.000
Pao2, mm Hg 96.24 ± 31.21 76.97 ± 28.29 t(150) = 2.218§ 0.037
Paco2, mm Hg 34.70 ± 5.17 27.14 ± 10.87 t(150) = 3.144§ 0.004
Inhaled oxygen concentration 0.36 ± 0.12 0.53 ± 0.22 Z = − 2.750† 0.006
Tendency of chest radiograph abnormalities Fisher exact test
1 (deteriorating) 125 (98.43) 25 (100)
2 (stable) 2 (1.57) 0 (0)
3 (improving) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Rigor at onset 69 (54.33) 19 (76.00) χ2(1)= 4.024‡ 0.045
Pulmonary rales 15 (11.81) 15 (60.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
OI grading Fisher exact test 0.118
1, < 100 9 (7.09) 5 (20.00)
2, ≥ 100 to < 200 31 (24.41) 6 (24.00)
3, ≥ 200 to < 300 87 (68.50) 14 (56.00)
4, ≥ 300 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Underlying disease∥ 33 (25.98) 13 (52.00) χ2(1) = 6.699‡ 0.010
Complications 89 (70.08) 23 (92.00) χ2(1) = 5.177‡ 0.023
Pneumothorax 4 (3.15) 2 (8.00) Fisher exact test 0.256
Mediastinal emphysema 9 (7.09) 5 (20.00) Fisher exact test 0.056
Shock 0 (0.00) 8 (32.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy 1 (0.80) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Renal dysfunction# 7 (5.51) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Liver dysfunction** 49 (38.59) 13 (52.00) χ2(1) = 1.557‡ 0.212
Myocardial injury†† 10 (7.87) 17 (68.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Arrhythmias 7 (5.51) 6 (24.00) Fisher exact test 0.008
Pulmonary infection 17 (13.39) 20 (80.00) χ2(1) = 50.329‡ 0.000
Extrapulmonary infection 2 (1.57) 3 (12.00) Fisher exact test 0.032
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome 2 (1.57) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
GI hemorrhage 2 (1.57) 7 (28.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Others 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)

Table 2.

General Characteristics of the Patients Between Survivors and Deaths in All 401 Cases*

Characteristics Survivors (n = 376) Deaths (n = 25) Statistics p Value
Age, yr 33.44 ± 12.10 54.20 ± 15.64 Z = − 6.079† 0.000
Male/female gender, No. 116/260 13/12 χ2(1) = 4.805‡ 0.028
Patients receiving steroids 250 (66.49) 18 (72) χ2(1) = 03.21‡ 0.571
Median (IQR) of accumulative dose, mg 1,723.60 (2,000) 3,874.42 (5,920) Z = − 2.488† 0.011
Median (IQR) of mean daily dose, mg 122.95 (95.57) 248.91 (198.33) Z = − 2.701† 0.007
Use of invasive ventilation 16 (4.26) 21 (84.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Median (IQR) of time from onset to hospitalization, d 3 (3) 4 (4) Z = −2.213† 0.027
Time of initiation of corticosteroid therapy, d from the onset of SARS 5.00 ± 3.52 5.04 ± 3.12 Z = −0.048† 0.961
Temperature, °C 38.50 ± 0.95 39.05 ± 0.57 t(399) = − 4.452§ 0.000
Duration of fever, d 11.56 ± 2.89 13.76 ± 3.09 t(399) = − 3.668§ 0.000
Myalgia 119 (31.65) 6 (24.00) χ2(1) = 0.639‡ 0.424
Cough and expectoration 87 (23.14) 11 (44.00) χ2(1) = 5.525‡ 0.019
Dyspnea 126 (33.51) 14 (56.00) χ2(1) = 5.217‡ 0.022
Respiratory rate 24.96 ± 5.65 32.40 ± 5.53 Z = − 6.242† 0.000
Peripheral counts of WBCs, × 109/L 6.96 ± 3.99 8.92 ± 3.63 Z= − 2.231† 0.025
Neutrophils/WBCs 0.61 ± 0.16 0.72 ± 0.17 t(399) = − 4.314§ 0.002
Lymphocytes, × 109/L 0.19 ± 0.10 0.15 ± 0.09 Z = − 1.678† 0.093
Serum lactate dehydrogenase, IU/L 243.22 ± 117.42 391.86 ± 238.85 Z = − 4.174† 0.000
Peripheral oxygen saturation, % 96.23 ± 2.91 94.78 ± 4.53 Z = − 2.120† 0.034
Heart rate, beats/min 99.08 ± 11.81 127.24 ± 17.60 Z = − 6.806† 0.000
Pao2, mm Hg 101.57 ± 32.15 76.97 ± 28.29 Z = − 2.692† 0.007
Paco2, mm Hg 32.90 ± 5.99 27.14 ± 10.87 t(399) = 3.688§ 0.000
Inhaled oxygen concentration 0.33 ± 0.10 0.53 ± 0.22 Z = −3.304† 0.001
Tendency of chest radiograph abnormalities
1 (deteriorating) 357 (94.95) 25 (100) Fisher exact test 0.663
2 (stable) 17 (4.52) 0 (0)
3 (improving) 2 (0.53) 0 (0)
Rigor at onset 175 (46.54) 19 (76.00) χ2(1) = 8.145‡ 0.004
Pulmonary rales 97 (28.87) 15 (60.00) χ2(1) = 13.623‡ 0.000
OI grading 5 (1.33) 5 (20.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
1, < 100 45 (11.97) 6 (24.00)
2, ≥ 100 to < 200 77 (20.48) 14 (56.00)
3, ≥ 200 to < 300 249 (66.22) 0 (0)
4, ≥ 300
Underlying disease∥ 76 (20.21) 13 (52.00) χ2(1) = 13.716‡ 0.000
Complications 179 (47.61) 23 (92.00) χ2(1) = 18.480‡ 0.000
Pneumothorax 4 (1.06) 2 (8.00) Fisher exact test 0.048
Mediastinal emphysema 9 (2.39) 5 (20.00) Fisher exact test 0.001
Shock 0 (0) 8 (32.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Disseminated intravascular coagulation 1 (0.27) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Renal dysfunction# 10 (2.66) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Liver dysfunction** 108 (28.72) 13 (52.00) χ2(1) = 6.028‡ 0.014
Myocardial injury†† 15 (3.99) 17 (68.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Arrhythmias 9 (2.39) 6 (24.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Pulmonary infection 21 (5.59) 20 (80.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Extrapulmonary infection 2 (0.53) 3 (12.00) Fisher exact test 0.002
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome 2 (0.53) 9 (36.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
GI hemorrhage 2 (0.53) 7 (28.00) Fisher exact test 0.000
Others 1 (0.27%) 0 (0.00%) Fisher exact test 1.000

Multiple Logistic Regression (Forward Stepwise)

Two logistic regressions were performed, with death and complication as end points, respectively, and the use of steroid as well as the above-mentioned potential confounders as independent variables.

Regression for Case Fatality

A logistic regression based on the data of 401 SARS cases with death (yes/no) as end point showed no significant difference in case fatality between steroid- and nonsteroid-treated patients. However, the result of a logistic regression based on the data of 152 critical SARS cases showed that steroid therapy significantly reduced the case fatality among critical SARS patients after the death-related variables were adjusted, such as age, rigor at onset, secondary lower respiratory infection, pulmonary rales, and OI grading (1, < 100; 2, ≥ 100 and < 200; 3, ≥ 200 and < 300; and 4, ≥ 300). The odds ratio (OR) of case fatality between steroid-treated patients and nonsteroid-treated patients was 0.083 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.007 to 0.956) [Table 4].

Table 4.

Results of Logistic Regression for Case Fatality Based on the Data of 152 Critical SARS Cases*

95% CI for Odds Ratio
Variables β SE Wald df Significance Odds Ratio Lower Upper
Steroid use − 2.488 1.247 3.983 1 0.046 0.083 0.007 0.956
Age, yr 0.072 0.033 4.710 1 0.030 1.074 1.007 1.146
Rigor at onset 1.864 0.897 4.316 1 0.038 6.446 1.112 37.402
Secondary respiratory infection 4.517 1.149 15.467 1 0.000 91.588 9.648 870.321
Pulmonary rales 0.929 0.413 5.065 1 0.024 2.531 1.128 5.684
OI grading − 1.734 0.599 8.384 1 0.004 0.177 0.055 0.571
Constant − 3.788 2.289 2.738 1 0.098 0.023

Regression for Complication Presentation

Both logistic regressions based on the data of 401 SARS cases and 152 critical SARS cases with at least one complication (yes/no) as an end point showed no significant difference in complication presentation between steroid- and nonsteroid-treated patients after adjusting for invasive ventilation (Table 5).

Table 5.

Results of Logistic Regression for Factors Related to Incidence of Complications in Critical SARS Based on 152 Critical SARS Cases*

95% CI for Odds Ratio
Variables β SE Wald df Significance Odds Ratio Lower Upper
Steroid use 0.029 0.438 0.004 1 0.948 1.029 0.436 2.426
Invasive ventilation 1.522 0.527 8.336 1 0.004 4.582 1.630 12.875
Constant − 0.643 0.450 2.038 1 0.153 0.526

Multiple Cox Regression

Case Fatality

Based on the data of 401 SARS cases, Cox regression with death (yes/no) as an end point failed to show significant difference in survival time since the first time of fever between the two groups. However, based on the data of 152 critical SARS cases, the result of Cox regression showed that use of steroids reduced the odds of case fatality among critical SARS patients (Table 6). The odds of case fatality among steroid-treated patients was 0.37 times as much as that among nonsteroid-treated patients after the variables of using invasive ventilation and age were adjusted (Table 5). The effect of steroids on survival time was shown in Figure 1. On day 40, the survival rates among steroid- and nonsteroid-treated patients were 96.3% and 92.3%, respectively.

Table 6.

Results of Cox Regression for Survival Time Based on 152 Critical SARS Cases*

95% CI for Odds Ratio
Variables β SE Wald df Significance Odds Ratio Lower Upper
Steroid use − 0.988 0.503 3.830 1 0.050 0.372 0.139 0.998
Invasive ventilation 3.739 0.775 23.278 1 0.000 42.035 9.206 191.945
Age 0.046 0.016 7.711 1 0.005 1.047 1.014 1.081
Figure 1.

Figure 1

Survival time for case fatality among 152 critical cases, adjusted for confounding variables (Table 6).

Hospital Discharge

Based on the data of survivors (376 cases) among 401 SARS cases, analysis of hospitalization days of survivors by Cox regression did not show significant difference between patients receiving steroids or not. However, based on the data of survivors (127 cases) among 152 critical SARS cases, the results of a Cox regression showed that the number of hospitalization days was reduced by steroid therapy after the variables of complication presentation was adjusted. The odds of earlier discharge among steroid-treated patients was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.025 to 2.964) the odds of being discharged among nonsteroid-treated patients (Table 7). The effect of steroids on hospitalization days is shown in Figure 2.

Table 7.

Results of Cox Regression for Hospitalization Days Based on the 127 Survivors of Critical SARS Cases*

95% CI for Odds Ratio
Variables β SE Wald df Significance Odds Ratio Lower Upper
Steroid use 0.556 0.271 4.211 1 0.040 1.743 1.025 2.964
Complications − 0.608 0.201 9.171 1 0.002 0.544 0.367 0.807
Figure 2.

Figure 2

Survival time to discharge from the hospital of 127 survivors of critical cases, adjusting for confounding variables (Table 7). Cum = cumulative.

Discussion

As a new emerging infectious severe respiratory disease, the diagnosis and management of SARS attracts much attention. There have been many publications on its diagnosis and management. Most of the previous reports used clinically oriented criteria for case identification, which was not specific and prone to overdiagnosis. The positive rate of convalescent antibody was reported 77.7% by Tian et al,20 and 85.7% by Gao et al.21 In a study of 70 patients (all of them were health-care workers) with definite contact history and typical presentation, Chen22 was able to show a 100% seroconversion or a fourfold rise in serum SARS-IgG in convalescent phase. The above-mentioned information suggested that diagnosis of SARS based on clinical information alone might cause overdiagnosis. In our study, we reviewed only cases confirmed by virology to avoid bias from inclusion of unconfirmed cases.

Since no SARS-specific treatment has been developed, management of this disease remains clinically based and supportive. Importantly, acute respiratory failure typically seen during the late phase of critical SARS, mainly presenting with dyspnea and hypoxia, meets the diagnostic criteria for ALI. For this reason, steroid therapy in critical SARS has become a focus of interest. After the report of clinical experience of expert panel23 from Guangzhou, there have been several reports on steroids therapy in critical SARS, and also no lack of controversy as to their outcomes and usage. Ho et al6 compared 17 cases receiving high-dose pulse methylprednisolone therapy (ie, 500 mg/d for 5 to 7 consecutive days, then tapered to 20 mg/d over a total course of 21 days) with 55 cases receiving low-dose non-pulse corticosteroid (equivalent to approximately 2 to 3 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone) therapy. It was reported that patients receiving high-dose pulse corticosteroid had less oxygen requirement, better radiographic outcome, and less likelihood of requiring subsequent high-dose pulse corticosteroid therapy than their counterparts. There was no significant difference between the two groups in severe secondary infections. However, in the study by Ho et al,6 there was no control (receiving no corticosteroid) group.4 Zhao and colleagues4 compared the clinical outcome of four treatment protocols in 190 cases of SARS. It was suggested that on the basis of antibiotics and antivirals (ribavirin and recombinant interferon-α), early high-dosage steroids (160 to 1,000 mg/d of methylprednisolone) resulted in best outcomes and no death as compared with low-dose steroid therapy. However, this was not a randomized controlled study. Patients admitted in different periods received different treatment protocol, and major confounders affecting the outcome of SARS were not adjusted with multivariate analysis. The study by Meng et al7 indicated that early administration of steroids was helpful for symptom relieving and pulmonary resolution. It was shown that low-dose methylprednisolone (40 to 80 mg/d) was associated with significantly shorter hospital days vs high-dose drug (320 to 640 mg/d). Sung et al9 reported the outcome a stepwise treatment protocol of steroid administration in the treatment of SARS in Hong Kong. The initial treatment was broad-spectrum antibiotics, a combination of ribavirin and low-dose corticosteroid. High-dose methylprednisolone (500 mg/d) was administered if the patient deteriorated despite initial treatment. Among the 138 patients, 25 patients (18.1%) responded to ribavirin and low-dose corticosteroid. High-dose methylprednisolone was used in 107 patients, of whom 95 patients (88.8%) responded favorably. Evidence of hemolytic anemia was observed in 49 patients (36%). Thirty-seven patients (26.8%) required admission to the ICU, 21 patients (15.2%) required invasive mechanical ventilation, and 15 patients (10.9%) died. It was suggested that the use of high-dose pulse methylprednisolone during the clinical course of a SARS outbreak was associated with clinical improvement. Nevertheless, there were also opposite opinions. Data from Li et al24 showed that high-dose steroids further deteriorated the low level of CD4+, CD8+, and CD3+, giving rise to severe secondary infections. Lee et al25 reported the effect of steroid therapy on SARS-CoV load. Serial plasma SARS-CoV RNA concentrations were measured using a one-step real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR assay targeting the nucleocapsid gene. It was found that plasma SARS-CoV RNA concentrations in the second and third week of illness were significantly higher in patients who received initial hydrocortisone treatment (n = 9), as compared to those who received placebo (n = 7) [area under the curve; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.023]. An increase in the 30-day mortality associated with high-dose steroids was also implicated by Tsang et al.26 The variability of results from all the studies may lie in several reasons. First, some of the cases in the above-mentioned articles20, 21 were of seronegative SARS-IgG, which were responsible for a bias due to overdiagnosis. In our study, only 401 of 1,278 registered cases in Guangzhou fulfilled the criteria of case identification instituted by World Health Organization. Second, the matching of SARS cases was not strictly controlled in these studies. As was shown in present study, noncritical SARS was not associated with mortality, but 59.0% of the patients received steroid therapy. Mixing the noncritical and critical SARS information together would interfere with the ability of statistical analysis to evaluate the effects of steroid on mortality. This might be the reason that steroid showed no efficacy on mortality in SARS patients as a whole but was significantly effective in critical SARS. Third, the adjustment of confounders was crucial in minimizing the effects of incomparability of baseline condition. In the present study, much more attention was paid to adjustment of baseline condition of important confounders. After adjusting the confounders with multivariate analysis, it was shown that proper use of steroid resulted in less fatality, lower instant mortality, and fewer hospital days.

The mechanisms of corticosteroid in the management of SARS are unclear. As the clinical manifestations and diagnosis criteria for critical SARS are largely identical to those of ALI, the only difference being that critical SARS is definitely caused by SARS-CoV infection, whereas ALI may result from a variety of etiology, including infective and noninfective. The mechanism of corticosteroid in critical SARS might share the similarity with ALI/ARDS. In ARDS,27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 excessive systemic inflammation has been documented, in which, nuclear factor-κB may be responsible for glucosteroid resistance, leading to relative adrenal insufficiency and subsequently aggravation of ARDS. Replacement with exogenous methylprednisolone may relieve the symptoms by ameliorating systemic inflammation.30 Therefore, current opinion holds that steroid therapy in ARDS should be given only on the basis of relative adrenal insufficiency induced by systemic inflammation and oriented to suppression of systemic inflammation. The duration of steroids depends on the length of inflammation. In a word, the proper guideline for steroid administration in ALI/ARDS include initializing appropriate doses of steroids at time of relative adrenal insufficiency, which was reflected in our study in terms of the steroid use. However, steroids should not be delayed until ARDS is fully developed. Advanced ARDS with apparently severe pathology will set back the efficacy of steroids.

In a cohort study by Peiris et al,33 it was found that from a view of viral replication and inflammatory response, the clinical progression of SARS presented a triphasic pattern. The early phase was characterized by systemic symptoms related to the effect of viral replication. As the disease progressed into the mid-phase, systemic inflammatory response syndrome became prominent, giving rise to systemic inflammatory response syndrome-induced lung injuries (ALI or ARDS) and many complications during the late phase. It was noted that the timing of the IgG seroconversion that started on day 10 seemed to correlate with falls in viral shedding from nasopharynx. Severe clinical worsening also occurred at this time, possibly related to immunopathologic damage. The presence of immunopathologic damage was confirmed by Jiang et al34 in their study that interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) was markedly elevated in the blood during the early stage of SARS, and remained at a high level until convalescence; moreover, IP-10 was highly expressed in both lung and lymphoid tissues, in which monocyte-macrophage infiltration and depletion of lymphocytes were observed. The clinical worsening during the midphase of SARS may be a result from the immunopathologic damage due to overexuberant host response, which can be reduced by steroids. In a recent study35 on cytokine profile of SARS patients, marked elevation of T-helper type 1 cytokine interferon-γ and inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1, (IL)-6, and (IL)-12 was showed for at least 2 weeks after disease onset. Corticosteroid reduced significantly IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and IP-10 concentrations from days 5 to 8 after treatment, confirming the activation of T-helper type 1 cell-mediated immunity in SARS through the accumulation of monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils. In another study,36 IL-10, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-γ were higher than normal before treatment, and corticosteroid treatment resulted in fall in IL-10 but not in IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-γ. These data suggested that steroid therapy showed advantages in reducing inflammatory response and protection from lung injury.

It is well known that corticosteroid therapy is a double-edged sword. As pointed out in the study by Lee et al,25 early corticosteroid treatment might be associated with a higher subsequent plasma viral load. As no data are published so far showing the benefit of corticosteroids in SARS during the early phase when SARS-CoV replication is ongoing, there is no evidence for a lopsided wish to use steroids in SARS as early as possible and also for high-dose administration regardless the severity of the disease, until the exact mechanism of steroids therapy is further elucidated.

The potential benefits of steroid therapy in critical SARS included improving pulmonary oxygenation, reducing the need for intubation, case fatality, and pulmonary fibrosis. However, our study revealed only reduced fatality and shorter hospital stay in critical SARS, and failed to demonstrate the other advantages related to steroid administration. Future studies are needed to elucidate these effects using animal models and randomized prospective case-controlled clinical trials.

The adverse effects of steroids have been acknowledged elsewhere, including hyperglycemia, high BP, hypokalemia, immunocompromise, and superinfection. These effects depend on various factors, ie, the underlying diseases, age, severity, other interventions, as well as the dose and duration of steroids. In our study, secondary infection SARS was shown only related to the employment of invasive ventilation but not statistically related to the use of steroids. Nevertheless, monitoring and prevention of secondary infection and other complications are strictly indicated during steroid therapy.

Another noticeable problem about steroids lies in its relationship with avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) in SARS convalescents. In a cluster sampling survey of health-care workers from four hospitals in Guangzhou, Shen et al37 found that the rate of AVN was 3.2% (4 of 124 cases), which was much lower than other reports38, 39, 40 in correlation with the maximal single-day dose of steroids. The low incidence of AVN in SARS cases in Guangzhou may be related to the comparatively low dose and short duration of steroid use in this region.

In addition to steroids, the fatality of critical SARS may be affected by many other relevant factors. Multivariate analysis in our study showed that elder age, rigor at onset, secondary lower respiratory infections, pulmonary rales, and use of invasive ventilation were related to higher fatality. The contribution of invasive ventilation to increased fatality may arise from increased rate of complications or from those with more serious condition per se.

In conclusion, our retrospective study of Guangzhou SARS cases demonstrated less fatality, shorter hospitalization days, and no significant effect on lower respiratory infections in confirmed critical SARS patients when corticosteroids were administered properly. These findings supported rational use of steroids in critical SARS with an OI < 300 mm Hg.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Drs. Y-D Xu, Z-G Zheng, G-Q Zeng (First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College); Z-W Zhao (First Municipal People’s Hospital Guangzhou); Z-T Huang, J-G Li (Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University); Z-D Deng, T-T Zhang (Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University), W-J Huang (Military General Hospital Guangzhou); L Lin (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine); M Wang (Guangzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Z-X Chen, X-P Chen (Guangzhou Provincial People’s Hospital); and M Jiang (Zhongshan University School of Public Health).

Footnotes

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml)

This research was sponsored by Chinese National Research Grant and Guangdong Provincial Research Grant.

References