Distinct sequence elements control the specificity of G protein activation by muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes (original) (raw)

Abstract

Relatively little is understood concerning the mechanisms by which subtypes of receptors, G proteins and effector enzymes interact to transduce specific signals. Through expression of normal, hybrid and deletion mutant receptors in Xenopus oocytes, we determined the G protein coupling characteristics of the functionally distinct m2 and m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes and identified the critical receptor sequences responsible for G protein specificity. Activation of a pertussis toxin insensitive G protein pathway, leading to a rapid and transient release of intracellular Ca2+ characteristic of the m3 receptor, could be specified by the transfer of as few as nine amino acids from the m3 to the m2 receptor. In a reciprocal manner, transfer of no more than 21 residues from the m2 to the m3 receptor was sufficient to specify activation of a pertussis toxin sensitive G protein coupled to a slow and oscillatory Ca2+ release pathway typical of the m2 subtype. Notably, these critical residues occur within the same region of the third cytoplasmic domain of functionally distinct mAChR subtypes.

4381

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashkenazi A., Peralta E. G., Winslow J. W., Ramachandran J., Capon D. J. Functionally distinct G proteins selectively couple different receptors to PI hydrolysis in the same cell. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):487–493. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berridge M. J., Irvine R. F. Inositol phosphates and cell signalling. Nature. 1989 Sep 21;341(6239):197–205. doi: 10.1038/341197a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner T. I., Buckley N. J., Young A. C., Brann M. R. Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Science. 1987 Jul 31;237(4814):527–532. doi: 10.1126/science.3037705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bujo H., Nakai J., Kubo T., Fukuda K., Akiba I., Maeda A., Mishina M., Numa S. Different sensitivities to agonist of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. FEBS Lett. 1988 Nov 21;240(1-2):95–100. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80346-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casey P. J., Gilman A. G. G protein involvement in receptor-effector coupling. J Biol Chem. 1988 Feb 25;263(6):2577–2580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cotecchia S., Exum S., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. Regions of the alpha 1-adrenergic receptor involved in coupling to phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and enhanced sensitivity of biological function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(8):2896–2900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.2896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dascal N., Gillo B., Lass Y. Role of calcium mobilization in mediation of acetylcholine-evoked chloride currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Physiol. 1985 Sep;366:299–313. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dascal N., Landau E. M., Lass Y. Xenopus oocyte resting potential, muscarinic responses and the role of calcium and guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate. J Physiol. 1984 Jul;352:551–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dixon R. A., Sigal I. S., Strader C. D. Structure-function analysis of the beta-adrenergic receptor. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):487–497. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dohlman H. G., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. A family of receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins. Biochemistry. 1987 May 19;26(10):2657–2664. doi: 10.1021/bi00384a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fukuda K., Higashida H., Kubo T., Maeda A., Akiba I., Bujo H., Mishina M., Numa S. Selective coupling with K+ currents of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in NG108-15 cells. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):355–358. doi: 10.1038/335355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fukuda K., Kubo T., Akiba I., Maeda A., Mishina M., Numa S. Molecular distinction between muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Nature. 1987 Jun 18;327(6123):623–625. doi: 10.1038/327623a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilman A. G. G proteins: transducers of receptor-generated signals. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:615–649. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.003151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giniger E., Ptashne M. Transcription in yeast activated by a putative amphipathic alpha helix linked to a DNA binding unit. Nature. 1987 Dec 17;330(6149):670–672. doi: 10.1038/330670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Higashijima T., Uzu S., Nakajima T., Ross E. M. Mastoparan, a peptide toxin from wasp venom, mimics receptors by activating GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins). J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6491–6494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kobilka B. K., Kobilka T. S., Daniel K., Regan J. W., Caron M. G., Lefkowitz R. J. Chimeric alpha 2-,beta 2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1310–1316. doi: 10.1126/science.2836950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kubo T., Bujo H., Akiba I., Nakai J., Mishina M., Numa S. Location of a region of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor involved in selective effector coupling. FEBS Lett. 1988 Dec 5;241(1-2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kubo T., Fukuda K., Mikami A., Maeda A., Takahashi H., Mishina M., Haga T., Haga K., Ichiyama A., Kangawa K. Cloning, sequencing and expression of complementary DNA encoding the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Nature. 1986 Oct 2;323(6087):411–416. doi: 10.1038/323411a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kunkel T. A., Roberts J. D., Zakour R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:367–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lechleiter J., Peralta E., Clapham D. Diverse functions of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1989 Dec;Suppl:34–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Melton D. A., Krieg P. A., Rebagliati M. R., Maniatis T., Zinn K., Green M. R. Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 25;12(18):7035–7056. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.18.7035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Munson P. J., Rodbard D. Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal Biochem. 1980 Sep 1;107(1):220–239. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90515-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neer E. J., Clapham D. E. Roles of G protein subunits in transmembrane signalling. Nature. 1988 May 12;333(6169):129–134. doi: 10.1038/333129a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nishizuka Y. The molecular heterogeneity of protein kinase C and its implications for cellular regulation. Nature. 1988 Aug 25;334(6184):661–665. doi: 10.1038/334661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peralta E. G., Ashkenazi A., Winslow J. W., Ramachandran J., Capon D. J. Differential regulation of PI hydrolysis and adenylyl cyclase by muscarinic receptor subtypes. Nature. 1988 Aug 4;334(6181):434–437. doi: 10.1038/334434a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peralta E. G., Ashkenazi A., Winslow J. W., Smith D. H., Ramachandran J., Capon D. J. Distinct primary structures, ligand-binding properties and tissue-specific expression of four human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3923–3929. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02733.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peralta E. G., Winslow J. W., Peterson G. L., Smith D. H., Ashkenazi A., Ramachandran J., Schimerlik M. I., Capon D. J. Primary structure and biochemical properties of an M2 muscarinic receptor. Science. 1987 May 1;236(4801):600–605. doi: 10.1126/science.3107123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rhee S. G., Suh P. G., Ryu S. H., Lee S. Y. Studies of inositol phospholipid-specific phospholipase C. Science. 1989 May 5;244(4904):546–550. doi: 10.1126/science.2541501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shapiro R. A., Nathanson N. M. Deletion analysis of the mouse m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: effects on phosphoinositide metabolism and down-regulation. Biochemistry. 1989 Oct 31;28(22):8946–8950. doi: 10.1021/bi00448a039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tabor S., Richardson C. C. DNA sequence analysis with a modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(14):4767–4771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wess J., Brann M. R., Bonner T. I. Identification of a small intracellular region of the muscarinic m3 receptor as a determinant of selective coupling to PI turnover. FEBS Lett. 1989 Nov 20;258(1):133–136. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81633-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wong S. K., Parker E. M., Ross E. M. Chimeric muscarinic cholinergic: beta-adrenergic receptors that activate Gs in response to muscarinic agonists. J Biol Chem. 1990 Apr 15;265(11):6219–6224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]