Inhibition of in vitro nuclear transport by a lectin that binds to nuclear pores (original) (raw)

Abstract

Selective transport of proteins is a major mechanism by which biochemical differences are maintained between the cytoplasm and nucleus. To begin to investigate the molecular mechanism of nuclear transport, we used an in vitro transport system composed of a Xenopus egg extract, rat liver nuclei, and a fluorescently labeled nuclear protein, nucleoplasmin. With this system, we screened for inhibitors of transport. We found that the lectin, wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), completely inhibits the nuclear transport of fluorescently labeled nucleoplasmin. No other lectin tested affected nuclear transport. The inhibition by WGA was not seen when N-acetylglucosamine was present and was reversible by subsequent addition of sugar. When rat liver nuclei that had been incubated with ferritin-labeled WGA were examined by electron microscopy, multiple molecules of WGA were found bound to the cytoplasmic face of each nuclear pore. Gel electrophoresis and nitrocellulose transfer identified one major and several minor nuclear protein bands as binding 125I-labeled WGA. The most abundant protein of these, a 63-65-kD glycoprotein, is a candidate for the inhibitory site of action of WGA on nuclear protein transport. WGA is the first identified inhibitor of nuclear protein transport and interacts directly with the nuclear pore.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson R. P., Blobel G. On the attachment of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1974 Sep;62(3):746–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.3.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agutter P. S., McCaldin B., McArdle H. J. Importance of mammalian nuclear-envelope nucleoside triphosphatase in nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of ribonucleoproteins. Biochem J. 1979 Sep 15;182(3):811–819. doi: 10.1042/bj1820811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baglia F. A., Maul G. G. Nuclear ribonucleoprotein release and nucleoside triphosphatase activity are inhibited by antibodies directed against one nuclear matrix glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(8):2285–2289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartles J. R., Hubbard A. L. 125I-wheat germ agglutinin blotting: increased sensitivity with polyvinylpyrrolidone quenching and periodate oxidation/reductive phenylamination. Anal Biochem. 1984 Jul;140(1):284–292. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berrios M., Blobel G., Fisher P. A. Characterization of an ATPase/dATPase activity associated with the Drosophila nuclear matrix-pore complex-lamina fraction. Identification of the putative enzyme polypeptide by direct ultraviolet photoaffinity labeling. J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 10;258(7):4548–4555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berrios M., Fisher P. A. A myosin heavy-chain-like polypeptide is associated with the nuclear envelope in higher eukaryotic cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Sep;103(3):711–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.3.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blobel G., Potter V. R. Nuclei from rat liver: isolation method that combines purity with high yield. Science. 1966 Dec 30;154(3757):1662–1665. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3757.1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonner W. M. Protein migration into nuclei. I. Frog oocyte nuclei in vivo accumulate microinjected histones, allow entry to small proteins, and exclude large proteins. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):421–430. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis L. I., Blobel G. Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell. 1986 Jun 6;45(5):699–709. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90784-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Robertis E. M. Nucleocytoplasmic segregation of proteins and RNAs. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1021–1025. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90285-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dingwall C., Sharnick S. V., Laskey R. A. A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):449–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dwyer N., Blobel G. A modified procedure for the isolation of a pore complex-lamina fraction from rat liver nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1976 Sep;70(3):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.3.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Einck L., Bustin M. Functional histone antibody fragments traverse the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):205–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldherr C. M., Kallenbach E., Schultz N. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216–2222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldherr C. M., Ogburn J. A. Mechanism for the selection of nuclear polypeptides in Xenopus oocytes. II. Two-dimensional gel analysis. J Cell Biol. 1980 Dec;87(3 Pt 1):589–593. doi: 10.1083/jcb.87.3.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feldherr C. M., Richmond P. A., Noonan K. D. The distribution of ConA-binding sites on oocyte nuclear envelopes. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jul;107(2):439–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90367-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Forbes D. J., Kirschner M. W., Newport J. W. Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Franke W. W., Scheer U., Krohne G., Jarasch E. D. The nuclear envelope and the architecture of the nuclear periphery. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):39s–50s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.39s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerace L., Ottaviano Y., Kondor-Koch C. Identification of a major polypeptide of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;95(3):826–837. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.3.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall M. N., Hereford L., Herskowitz I. Targeting of E. coli beta-galactosidase to the nucleus in yeast. Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holt G. D., Hart G. W. The subcellular distribution of terminal N-acetylglucosamine moieties. Localization of a novel protein-saccharide linkage, O-linked GlcNAc. J Biol Chem. 1986 Jun 15;261(17):8049–8057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hozier J., Furcht L. T. Binding of lectins to mitotic chromosomes and interphase nuclear substructures. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1980 Dec;4(12):1091–1099. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(80)90046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang L. W., Schindler M. Chemical factors that influence nucleocytoplasmic transport: a fluorescence photobleaching study. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):853–858. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kan F. W., da Silva P. P. Preferential association of glycoproteins to the euchromatin regions of cross-fractured nuclei is revealed by fracture-label. J Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;102(2):576–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kornfeld R., Kornfeld S. Comparative aspects of glycoprotein structure. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:217–237. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.001245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krohne G., Franke W. W. Immunological identification and localization of the predominant nuclear protein of the amphibian oocyte nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):1034–1038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.6601299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maul G. G. The nuclear and the cytoplasmic pore complex: structure, dynamics, distribution, and evolution. Int Rev Cytol Suppl. 1977;(6):75–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McKeon F. D., Tuffanelli D. L., Fukuyama K., Kirschner M. W. Autoimmune response directed against conserved determinants of nuclear envelope proteins in a patient with linear scleroderma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4374–4378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mills A. D., Laskey R. A., Black P., De Robertis E. M. An acidic protein which assembles nucleosomes in vitro is the most abundant protein in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 25;139(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90148-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Newmeyer D. D., Finlay D. R., Forbes D. J. In vitro transport of a fluorescent nuclear protein and exclusion of non-nuclear proteins. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2091–2102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Newmeyer D. D., Lucocq J. M., Bürglin T. R., De Robertis E. M. Assembly in vitro of nuclei active in nuclear protein transport: ATP is required for nucleoplasmin accumulation. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):501–510. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Newport J., Spann T., Kanki J., Forbes D. The role of mitotic factors in regulating the timing of the midblastula transition in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1985;50:651–656. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1985.050.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nicolson G., Lacorbière M., Delmonte P. Outer membrane terminal saccharides of bovine liver nuclei and mitochondria. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):468–473. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90318-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Paine P. L., Moore L. C., Horowitz S. B. Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature. 1975 Mar 13;254(5496):109–114. doi: 10.1038/254109a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schindler M., Holland J. F., Hogan M. Lateral diffusion in nuclear membranes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1408–1414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seve A. P., Hubert J., Bouvier D., Masson C., Geraud G., Bouteille M. In situ distribution in different cell types of nuclear glycoconjugates detected by two lectins. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1984 Oct;16(4):631–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Spurr A. R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969 Jan;26(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stevens B. J., Swift H. RNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm in Chironomus salivary glands. J Cell Biol. 1966 Oct;31(1):55–77. doi: 10.1083/jcb.31.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Torres C. R., Hart G. W. Topography and polypeptide distribution of terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues on the surfaces of intact lymphocytes. Evidence for O-linked GlcNAc. J Biol Chem. 1984 Mar 10;259(5):3308–3317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Unwin P. N., Milligan R. A. A large particle associated with the perimeter of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):63–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Virtanen I., Wartiovaara J. Distribution of lectin binding sites on rat liver cell nuclei: comparison of fluorescein- and ferritin-labelling methods. Cell Mol Biol Incl Cyto Enzymol. 1978;23(1):73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Virtanen I., Wartiovaara J. Lectin receptor sites on rat liver cell nuclear membranes. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):335–344. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]