A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):5-14.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021108.
Russell Douglas Hull, Rollin Frederick Brant, Linda Knox, Graham Frederick Pineo, Christopher J Doig, Denny P Laporta, Sidney Viner, Louise Passerini, Hugh Devitt, Ann Kirby, Michael Jacka; Canadian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group
Affiliations
- PMID: 12510037
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021108
Free article
Clinical Trial
A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients
James Dean Sandham et al. N Engl J Med. 2003.
Free article
Abstract
Background: Some observational studies suggest that the use of pulmonary-artery catheters to guide therapy is associated with increased mortality.
Methods: We performed a randomized trial comparing goal-directed therapy guided by a pulmonary-artery catheter with standard care without the use of a pulmonary-artery catheter. The subjects were high-risk patients 60 years of age or older, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV risk, who were scheduled for urgent or elective major surgery, followed by a stay in an intensive care unit. Outcomes were adjudicated by observers who were unaware of the treatment-group assignments. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality from any cause.
Results: Of 3803 eligible patients, 1994 (52.4 percent) underwent randomization. The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. A total of 77 of 997 patients who underwent surgery without the use of a pulmonary-artery catheter (7.7 percent) died in the hospital, as compared with 78 of 997 patients in whom a pulmonary-artery catheter was used (7.8 percent)--a difference of 0.1 percentage point (95 percent confidence interval, -2.3 to 2.5). There was a higher rate of pulmonary embolism in the catheter group than in the standard-care group (8 events vs. 0 events, P=0.004). The survival rates at 6 months among patients in the standard-care and catheter groups were 88.1 and 87.4 percent, respectively (difference, -0.7 percentage point [95 percent confidence interval, -3.6 to 2.2]; negative survival differences favor standard care); at 12 months, the rates were 83.9 and 83.0 percent, respectively (difference, -0.9 percentage point [95 percent confidence interval, -4.3 to 2.4]). The median hospital stay was 10 days in each group.
Conclusions: We found no benefit to therapy directed by pulmonary-artery catheter over standard care in elderly, high-risk surgical patients requiring intensive care.
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
- Progress in research on pulmonary-artery catheters.
Parsons PE. Parsons PE. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):66-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020159. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12510046 No abstract available. - The use of pulmonary artery catheters.
Roitberg B. Roitberg B. Surg Neurol. 2003 Mar;59(3):145-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00073-9. Surg Neurol. 2003. PMID: 12681533 No abstract available. - Pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.
Cholley BP, Payen D. Cholley BP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 15;348(20):2035-7; author reply 2035-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200305153482019. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12748323 No abstract available. - Pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.
Schwann NM, Mangano DT; Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Schwann NM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 15;348(20):2035-7; author reply 2035-7. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12751469 No abstract available. - Pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.
Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Beattie SW. Karkouti K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 15;348(20):2035-7; author reply 2035-7. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12751470 No abstract available. - Therapy guided by pulmonary-artery catheter for high-risk surgical patients was not better than standard care.
Huang DT, Angus DC. Huang DT, et al. ACP J Club. 2003 Nov-Dec;139(3):66. ACP J Club. 2003. PMID: 14594417 No abstract available. - Catheters and the treatment of acute lung injury.
Tornero-Campello G. Tornero-Campello G. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):957-8; author reply 958. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16948187 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Comparison between replacement at 4 days and 7 days of the infection rate for pulmonary artery catheters in an intensive care unit.
Chen YY, Yen DH, Yang YG, Liu CY, Wang FD, Chou P. Chen YY, et al. Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1353-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000059433.79220.2B. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 12771602 Clinical Trial. - Progress in research on pulmonary-artery catheters.
Parsons PE. Parsons PE. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):66-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020159. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12510046 No abstract available. - Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Schoenfeld D, Wiedemann HP, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006 May 25;354(21):2213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061895. Epub 2006 May 21. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16714768 Clinical Trial. - Pulmonary artery catheters.
Perkin RM, Anas N. Perkin RM, et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S12-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318220f079. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 22129544 Review. - Does pulmonary artery catheter use change outcome? Yes.
Del Guercio LR. Del Guercio LR. Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jul;12(3):553-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70261-x. Crit Care Clin. 1996. PMID: 8839589 Review.
Cited by
- Cardiac output estimation using ballistocardiography: a feasibility study in healthy subjects.
Svensøy JN, Alonso E, Elola A, Bjørnerheim R, Ræder J, Aramendi E, Wik L. Svensøy JN, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):1671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52300-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38238507 Free PMC article. - Big data in healthcare: are we close to it?
Naidus E, Celi LA. Naidus E, et al. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Jan-Mar;28(1):8-10. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160008. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016. PMID: 27096670 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].
Wittkowski U, Spies C, Sander M, Erb J, Feldheiser A, von Heymann C. Wittkowski U, et al. Anaesthesist. 2009 Aug;58(8):764-78, 780-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1590-4. Anaesthesist. 2009. PMID: 19669105 Review. German. - Central venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference as an indicator of cardiac index.
Cuschieri J, Rivers EP, Donnino MW, Katilius M, Jacobsen G, Nguyen HB, Pamukov N, Horst HM. Cuschieri J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):818-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2602-8. Epub 2005 Apr 1. Intensive Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15803301 - Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL. Dellinger RP, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2. Epub 2007 Dec 4. Intensive Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18058085 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical