Metallic taste from electrical and chemical stimulation - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Metallic taste from electrical and chemical stimulation

Harry T Lawless et al. Chem Senses. 2005 Mar.

Abstract

A series of three experiments investigated the nature of metallic taste reports after stimulation with solutions of metal salts and after stimulation with metals and electric currents. To stimulate with electricity, a device was fabricated consisting of a small battery affixed to a plastic handle with the anode side exposed for placement on the tongue or oral tissues. Intensity of taste from metals and batteries was dependent upon the voltage and was more robust in areas dense in fungiform papillae. Metallic taste was reported from stimulation with ferrous sulfate solutions, from metals and from electric stimuli. However, reports of metallic taste were more frequent when the word 'metallic' was presented embedded in a list of choices, as opposed to simple free-choice labeling. Intensity decreased for ferrous sulfate when the nose was occluded, consistent with a decrease in retronasal smell, as previously reported. Intensity of taste evoked by copper metal, bimetallic stimuli (zinc/copper) or small batteries (1.5-3 V) was not affected by nasal occlusion. This difference suggests two distinct mechanisms for evocation of metallic taste reports, one dependent upon retronasal smell and a second mediated by oral chemoreceptors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Perceived intensity of the battery, zinc-copper and copper stimuli as a function of site of stimulation.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Perceived intensity of solid stimuli in experiment 2, with and without nasal occlusion.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Perceived intensity as a function of nasal occlusion for the solid stimuli, FeSO4 solutions and water, in experiment 3.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Frequency of reports of metallic sensations versus ‘no taste’ or ‘water’ for FeSO4 solutions and water in experiment 3 showing changes as a function of nasal occlusion for FeSO4 solutions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bartoshuk LM. History of taste research. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP, editors. Handbook of Perception. IVA. Tasting and Smelling. Academic Press; New York: 1978. pp. 2–18.
    1. Bodyfelt FW, Tobias J, Trout GM. Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products. Van Nostrand/AVI Publishing; New York: 1988.
    1. Borocz-Szabo M. The influence of iron contamination on the sensory properties of liquid foods. Acta Aliment. 1980;9:341–356.
    1. Breslin PAS, Gilmore MM, Beauchamp GK, Green BG. Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation. Chem. Senses. 1993;18:405–417.
    1. Buettner A, Schieberle P. Characterization of the most odor active volatiles in fresh hand-squeezed grapefruit juice (Citrus paradisi Macfayden) by quantitation and flavor reconstitution experiments. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:1358–1363. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources