Automated brain tissue assessment in the elderly and demented population: construction and validation of a sub-volume probabilistic brain atlas - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2005 Jul 15;26(4):1009-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.031.
Ivo D Dinov, John C Mazziotta, Mario Manese, Paul M Thompson, Chris Lindshield, Jacob Moussai, Nah Tran, Kirsten Olsen, Chris I Zoumalan, Roger P Woods, Arthur W Toga
Affiliations
- PMID: 15908234
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.031
Automated brain tissue assessment in the elderly and demented population: construction and validation of a sub-volume probabilistic brain atlas
Michael S Mega et al. Neuroimage. 2005.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop an automated imaging assessment tool that accommodates the anatomic variability of the elderly and demented population as well as the registration errors occurring during spatial normalization.
Methods: 20 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, or normal cognition underwent MRI brain imaging and had their 3D volumetric datasets manually partitioned into 68 regions of interest (ROI) termed sub-volumes. Gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) voxel counts were then made in the subject's native space for comparison against automated volumetric measures within three sub-volume probabilistic atlas (SVPA) models. The three SVPAs were constructed using 12 parameter affine (12 p), 2nd order (2nd), and 6th order (6th) transforms derived from registering the manually partitioned scans into a Talairach compatible AD population-based target. The three SVPA automated measures were compared to the manually derived measures in the 20 subjects' native space with a "jack-knife" procedure in which each subject was assessed by an SVPA they did not contribute toward constructing.
Results: The mean left and right GM ratio (GM ratio = [GM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs compared to the manually derived ratios across the 68 ROIs were 0.85 for the 12p SVPA, 0.88 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.89 for the 6th SVPA. The mean left and right WM ratio (WM ratio = [WM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs being 0.84 for the 12p SVPA, 0.86 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.88 for the 6th SVPA.
Conclusion: We have constructed, from an elderly and demented cohort, an automated brain volumetric tool that has excellent accuracy compared to a manual gold standard and is capable of regional hypothesis testing and individual patient assessment compared to a population.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- P41 RR 013642/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- R01 LM 005639/LM/NLM NIH HHS/United States
- RR 08655 K/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- RR 12169/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- RR 13642/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical