Metabolic and hedonic drives in the neural control of appetite: who is the boss? - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Metabolic and hedonic drives in the neural control of appetite: who is the boss?

Hans-Rudolf Berthoud. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Obesity is on the rise in all developed countries, and a large part of this epidemic has been attributed to excess caloric intake, induced by ever present food cues and the easy availability of energy dense foods in an environment of plenty. Clearly, there are strong homeostatic regulatory mechanisms keeping body weight of many individuals exposed to this environment remarkably stable over their adult life. Other individuals, however, seem to eat not only because of metabolic need, but also because of excessive hedonic drive to make them feel better and relieve stress. In the extreme, some individuals exhibit addiction-like behavior toward food, and parallels have been drawn to drug and alcohol addiction. However, there is an important distinction in that, unlike drugs and alcohol, food is a daily necessity. Considerable advances have been made recently in the identification of neural circuits that represent the interface between the metabolic and hedonic drives of eating. We will cover these new findings by focusing first on the capacity of metabolic signals to modulate processing of cognitive and reward functions in cortico-limbic systems (bottom-up) and then on pathways by which the cognitive and emotional brain may override homeostatic regulation (top-down).

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram showing the major factors determining neural control of appetite and regulation of energy balance. The brain monitors the internal milieu through a number of hormonal and neural nutrient sensing mechanisms and is under constant influence of the environment and lifestyle through the senses and mainly the cognitive and emotional brain. The two streams of information are integrated to generate adaptive behavioral (food intake) and autonomic/endocrine responsses determining nutrient partitioning, energy expenditure, and overall energy balance. All of the peripheral and central signaling steps are subject to individual predisposition either through genetic, epigenetic, or non-genetic early life imprinting mechanisms.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Schematic diagram showing potential interactions between the so called “homeostatic” energy balance regulatory system (blue) and neural systems involved in external sensory information processing (yellowish-brown), reward processing (purple), and cognition and executive functions (red), collectively referred to as “hedonic systems”. Blue arrows indicate bottom-up modulation of hedonic systems by homeostatic signals. Broken blue lines represent circulating hormones, metabolites, and other factors; solid blue lines represent neural pathways. Red arrows indicate top-down modulation of homeostatic processes by hedonic drives. See text for discussion of specific interactive pathways.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoebel BG. Inhibition and disinhibition of self-stimulation and feeding: hypothalamic control and postingestional factors. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968;66:89–100. - PubMed
    1. Goldstone AP, de Hernandez CG, Beaver JD, Muhammed K, Croese C, Bell G, Durighel G, Hughes E, Waldman AD, Frost G, et al. Fasting biases brain reward systems towards high-calorie foods. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:1625–1635. This fMRI study shows that when metabolically hungry, pictures of high calorie foods were more appealing and produced higher neural activation in cortico-limbic structures than pictures of low calorie foods, and subjective rating and brain responses were positively correlated. - PubMed
    1. Berridge KC, Robinson TE, Aldridge JW. Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:65–73. This paper is a brief summary of the highly influential theoretical framework of distinctive behavioral functions and underlying neural circuitries contributing to food reward behaviors. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tindell AJ, Smith KS, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW. Dynamic computation of incentive salience: “wanting” what was never “liked”. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12220–12228. In a model of salt depletion in rats the authors show that mesocorticolimbic systems including the ventral pallidum can compute “wanting’ of a nutrient de novo by integrating novel physiological signals with a cue’s preexisting associations to an outcome that lacked hedonic value. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shigemura N, Ohta R, Kusakabe Y, Miura H, Hino A, Koyano K, Nakashima K, Ninomiya Y. Leptin modulates behavioral responses to sweet substances by influencing peripheral taste structures. Endocrinology. 2004;145:839–847. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources