Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises - PubMed (original) (raw)
Meta-Analysis
Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises
Jacob M Wilson et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug.
Abstract
The primary objective of this investigation was to identify which components of endurance training (e.g., modality, duration, frequency) are detrimental to resistance training outcomes. A meta-analysis of 21 studies was performed with a total of 422 effect sizes (ESs). Criteria for the study included were (a) compare strength training alone to strength plus endurance training (concurrent) or to compare combinations of concurrent training; (b) the outcome measures include at least one measure of strength, power, or hypertrophy; and (c) the data necessary to calculate ESs must be included or available. The mean ES for hypertrophy for strength training was 1.23; for endurance training, it was 0.27; and for concurrent training, it was 0.85, with strength and concurrent training being significantly greater than endurance training only. The mean ES for strength development for strength training was 1.76; for endurance training, it was 0.78; and for concurrent training, it was 1.44. Strength and concurrent training was significantly greater than endurance training. The mean ES for power development for strength training only was 0.91; for endurance training, it was 0.11; and for concurrent training, it was 0.55. Significant differences were found between all the 3 groups. For moderator variables, resistance training concurrently with running, but not cycling, resulted in significant decrements in both hypertrophy and strength. Correlational analysis identified significant negative relationships between frequency (-0.26 to -0.35) and duration (-0.29 to -0.75) of endurance training for hypertrophy, strength, and power. Significant relationships (p < 0.05) between ES for decreased body fat and % maximal heart rate (r = -0.60) were also found. Our results indicate that interference effects of endurance training are a factor of the modality, frequency, and duration of the endurance training selected.
Similar articles
- Concurrent strength and endurance training exercise sequence does not affect neuromuscular adaptations in older men.
Wilhelm EN, Rech A, Minozzo F, Botton CE, Radaelli R, Teixeira BC, Reischak-Oliveira A, Pinto RS. Wilhelm EN, et al. Exp Gerontol. 2014 Dec;60:207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Exp Gerontol. 2014. PMID: 25449853 Clinical Trial. - Effects of a concurrent strength and endurance training on running performance and running economy in recreational marathon runners.
Ferrauti A, Bergermann M, Fernandez-Fernandez J. Ferrauti A, et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2770-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d64e9c. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. PMID: 20885197 Clinical Trial. - Effect of resistance training regimens on treadmill running and neuromuscular performance in recreational endurance runners.
Mikkola J, Vesterinen V, Taipale R, Capostagno B, Häkkinen K, Nummela A. Mikkola J, et al. J Sports Sci. 2011 Oct;29(13):1359-71. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.589467. Epub 2011 Aug 22. J Sports Sci. 2011. PMID: 21854344 Clinical Trial. - The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Murlasits Z, Kneffel Z, Thalib L. Murlasits Z, et al. J Sports Sci. 2018 Jun;36(11):1212-1219. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1364405. Epub 2017 Aug 7. J Sports Sci. 2018. PMID: 28783467 Review. - Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables.
Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Stepto NK. Fyfe JJ, et al. Sports Med. 2014 Jun;44(6):743-62. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0162-1. Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24728927 Review.
Cited by
- Benefits of self-paced concurrent training on lung function, cardiopulmonary fitness and fatigue perception in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Jallouli S, Maaloul R, Ghroubi S, Kammoun R, Damak M, Sakka S, Driss T, de Marco G, Mhiri C, Elleuch MH, Feki W, Hammouda O. Jallouli S, et al. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2024;14(5):173-187. doi: 10.1080/17582024.2024.2404385. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2024. PMID: 39439238 Clinical Trial. - Efficacy of lower limb strengthening exercises based on different muscle contraction characteristics for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Ding X, Yang Y, Xing Y, Jia Q, Liu Q, Zhang J. Ding X, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 25;11:1442683. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1442683. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39386751 Free PMC article. - The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.
Martinho DV, Rebelo A, Gouveia ÉR, Field A, Costa R, Ribeiro AS, Casonatto J, Amorim C, Sarmento H. Martinho DV, et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39300545 Free PMC article. - Protein Supplementation Increases Adaptations to Low-Volume, Intra-Session Concurrent Training in Untrained Healthy Adults: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial.
Reljic D, Zieseniss N, Herrmann HJ, Neurath MF, Zopf Y. Reljic D, et al. Nutrients. 2024 Aug 15;16(16):2713. doi: 10.3390/nu16162713. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39203849 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical