Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: evidence-led or tradition-driven? - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
doi: 10.1123/ijspp.7.3.242. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Affiliations
- PMID: 22356774
- DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.7.3.242
Review
Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: evidence-led or tradition-driven?
John Kiely. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012 Sep.
Abstract
The planning and organization of athletic training have historically been much discussed and debated in the coaching and sports science literature. Various influential periodization theorists have devised, promoted, and substantiated particular training-planning models based on interpretation of the scientific evidence and individual beliefs and experiences. Superficially, these proposed planning models appear to differ substantially. However, at a deeper level, it can be suggested that such models share a deep-rooted cultural heritage underpinned by a common set of historically pervasive planning beliefs and assumptions. A concern with certain of these formative assumptions is that, although no longer scientifically justifiable, their shaping influence remains deeply embedded. In recent years substantial evidence has emerged demonstrating that training responses vary extensively, depending upon multiple underlying factors. Such findings challenge the appropriateness of applying generic methodologies, founded in overly simplistic rule-based decision making, to the planning problems posed by inherently complex biological systems. The purpose of this review is not to suggest a whole-scale rejection of periodization theories but to promote a refined awareness of their various strengths and weaknesses. Eminent periodization theorists-and their variously proposed periodization models-have contributed substantially to the evolution of training-planning practice. However, there is a logical line of reasoning suggesting an urgent need for periodization theories to be realigned with contemporary elite practice and modern scientific conceptual models. In concluding, it is recommended that increased emphasis be placed on the design and implementation of sensitive and responsive training systems that facilitate the guided emergence of customized context-specific training-planning solutions.
Similar articles
- Periodization Theory: Confronting an Inconvenient Truth.
Kiely J. Kiely J. Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):753-764. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0823-y. Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29189930 Free PMC article. - An Integrated, Multifactorial Approach to Periodization for Optimal Performance in Individual and Team Sports.
Mujika I, Halson S, Burke LM, Balagué G, Farrow D. Mujika I, et al. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 May 1;13(5):538-561. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0093. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018. PMID: 29848161 Review. - New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization.
Issurin VB. Issurin VB. Sports Med. 2010 Mar 1;40(3):189-206. doi: 10.2165/11319770-000000000-00000. Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20199119 Review. - Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.
Hartmann H, Wirth K, Keiner M, Mickel C, Sander A, Szilvas E. Hartmann H, et al. Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26133514 Review. - The General Adaptation Syndrome: A Foundation for the Concept of Periodization.
Cunanan AJ, DeWeese BH, Wagle JP, Carroll KM, Sausaman R, Hornsby WG 3rd, Haff GG, Triplett NT, Pierce KC, Stone MH. Cunanan AJ, et al. Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0855-3. Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29307100 Review.
Cited by
- An analysis of training load in highly trained female football players.
K Winther A, Baptista I, Pedersen S, Brito J, B Randers M, Johansen D, Pettersen SA. K Winther A, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0299851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299851. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38547171 Free PMC article. - Coaches' Perceptions of Common Planning Concepts Within Training Theory: An International Survey.
Anyadike-Danes K, Donath L, Kiely J. Anyadike-Danes K, et al. Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 21;9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00657-6. Sports Med Open. 2023. PMID: 37989900 Free PMC article. - Strength and Conditioning Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches.
Loturco I, Haugen T, Freitas TT, Bishop C, Moura TBMA, Mercer VP, Alcaraz PE, Pereira LA, Weldon A. Loturco I, et al. J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:175-194. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159646. eCollection 2023 Mar. J Hum Kinet. 2023. PMID: 37181261 Free PMC article. - Flexible Training Planning Coupled with Flexible Assessment: A 12-Week Randomized Feasibility Study in a Youth Female Volleyball Team.
Loureiro M, Mesquita I, Ramos A, Coutinho P, Ribeiro J, Clemente FM, Nakamura FY, Afonso J. Loureiro M, et al. Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;10(1):29. doi: 10.3390/children10010029. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36670580 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical