Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients - PubMed (original) (raw)

Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients

Bonnie McCracken et al. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Flexion and extension radiographs are often used in the setting of trauma to clear a cervical spine injury. The utility of such tests, however, remains to be determined. We hypothesized that in patients who underwent a negative computed tomography (CT) cervical spine scan, flexion and extension radiographs did not yield useful additional information.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who had a negative CT scan of the cervical spine and a subsequent cervical flexion-extension study for evaluation of potential cervical spine injury. All flexion-extension films were independently reviewed to determine adequacy as defined by C7/T1 visualization and 30° of change in the angle from flexion to extension. The independent reviews were compared to formal radiology readings and the influence of the flexion-extension studies on clinical decision making was also reviewed.

Results: One thousand patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Review of the flexion-extension radiographs revealed that 80% of the films either did not adequately demonstrate the C7/T1 junction or had less than 30° range of motion. There was one missed injury that was also missed on magnetic resonance imaging. Results of the flexion-extension views had minimal effects on clinical decision making.

Conclusion: Adequate flexion extension films are difficult to obtain and are minimally helpful for clearance of the cervical spine in awake and alert trauma patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Review results

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Current guideline for clearance of the cervical spine

References

    1. El-Hoary GY, Kathol M, Daniel W. Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:43–50. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998567. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):94–99. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430203. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Hogan GJ, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Scalea TM. Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal? Radiology. 2005;237:106–113. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371040697. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Anderson PA, Muchow RD, Munoz A, Tontz WL, Resnick DK. Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;24:100–106. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b16494. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Barba CA, Taggert J, Morgan AS, Guerra J, Bernstein B, Lorenzo M, Gershon A, Espstein N. A new cervical spine clearance protocol using computed tomography. J Trauma. 2001;51:652–657. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200110000-00005. -DOI -PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources