Language barriers in Hispanic patients: relation to upper-extremity disability - PubMed (original) (raw)

Language barriers in Hispanic patients: relation to upper-extremity disability

Mariano E Menendez et al. Hand (N Y). 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although upper-extremity disability has been shown to correlate highly with various psychosocial aspects of illness (e.g., self-efficacy, depression, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing), the role of language in musculoskeletal health status is less certain. In an English-speaking outpatient hand surgery office setting, we sought to determine (1) whether a patient's primary native language (English or Spanish) is an independent predictor of upper-extremity disability and (2) whether there are any differences in the contribution of measures of psychological distress to disability between native English- and Spanish-speaking patients.

Methods: A total of 122 patients (61 native English speakers and 61 Spanish speakers) presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic completed sociodemographic information and three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-based computerized adaptive testing questionnaires: PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Depression, and PROMIS Upper-Extremity Physical Function. Bivariate and multivariable linear regression modeling were performed.

Results: Spanish-speaking patients reported greater upper-extremity disability, pain interference, and symptoms of depression than English-speaking patients. After adjusting for sociodemographic covariates and measures of psychological distress using multivariable regression modeling, the patient's primary language was not retained as an independent predictor of disability. PROMIS Depression showed a medium correlation (r = -0.35; p < 0.001) with disability in English-speaking patients, while the correlation was large (r = -0.52; p < 0.001) in Spanish-speaking patients. PROMIS Pain Interference had a large correlation with disability in both patient cohorts (Spanish-speaking: r = -0.66; p < 0.001; English-speaking: r = -0.77; p < 0.001). The length of time since immigration to the USA did not correlate with disability among Spanish speakers.

Conclusion: Primary language has less influence on symptom intensity and magnitude of disability than psychological distress and ineffective coping strategies. Interventions to optimize mood and to reduce pain interference should be considered in patients of all nationalities.

Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

Keywords: Acculturation; Disability; Hispanic; Immigration; Language; Latino.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010;150(1):173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025. -DOI -PMC -PubMed
    1. Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Lee H, et al. Reliability and validity of PROMIS cognitive abilities and cognitive concerns scales among people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16(1):1–8. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-047. -DOI -PMC -PubMed
    1. Bhargava A, Wartak SA, Friderici J, et al. The impact of Hispanic ethnicity on knowledge and behavior among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(3):336–43. doi: 10.1177/0145721714524450. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Blank SJ, Grindler DJ, Schulz KA, et al. Caregiver quality of life is related to severity of otitis media in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2):348–353. -PMC -PubMed
    1. Bot AG, Doornberg JN, Lindenhovius AL, et al. Long-term outcomes of fractures of both bones of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(6):527–32. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00581. -DOI -PubMed

LinkOut - more resources