Multiple imputation with non-additively related variables: Joint-modeling and approximations - PubMed (original) (raw)

Soeun Kim et al. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

This paper investigates multiple imputation methods for regression models with interacting continuous and binary predictors when continuous variable may be missing. Usual implementations for parametric multiple imputation assume a multivariate normal structure for the variables, which is not satisfied for a binary variable nor its interaction with a continuous variable. To accommodate interactions, missing covariates are multiply imputed from conditional distribution in a manner consistent with the joint model. Alternative imputation methods under multivariate normal assumptions are also considered as candidate approximations and evaluated in a simulation study. The results suggest that the joint modeling procedure performs generally well across a wide range of scenarios and so do the approximation methods that incorporate interactions in the model appropriately by stratification. It is critical to include interactions in the imputation model as failure to do so may result in low coverage and bias. We apply the joint modeling approach and approximation methods in the study of childhood trauma with gender × trauma interaction.

Keywords: Multiple imputation; binary predictor; interaction; joint modeling; missing covariate; multivariate normal assumption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Confidence Interval Coverage by each scenario (Nominal coverage is 95%.)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Plot of Results for Each Procedure by Gender: Alternative procedures lie between the two lines by JM

References

    1. Rubin DB. Multiple imputations in sample surveys Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association; 1978;20–34.
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996; 91:473–489.
    1. Horton NJ, Lipsitz SR and Parzen M. A Potential for Bias When Rounding in Multiple Imputation. The American Statistician 2003;57:229–232.
    1. Schater JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1997.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources