Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Profiles of Commonly Used Human Ocular Surface Cell Lines - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2018 Sep;43(9):1097-1101.

doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1480043. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Hasna Baidouri 1, Ashley M Woodward 3, Wendy R Kam 3, Yang Liu 3, Xiaomin Chen 3, Jillian F Ziemanski 4, Kerry Vistisen 5, Linda D Hazlett 5, Kelly K Nichols 4, Pablo Argüeso 3, David A Sullivan 3

Affiliations

Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Profiles of Commonly Used Human Ocular Surface Cell Lines

Alison M McDermott et al. Curr Eye Res. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to establish the short tandem repeat (STR) profiles of several human cell lines commonly used in ocular surface research.

Materials and methods: Independently DNA was extracted from multiple passages of three human corneal epithelial cell lines, two human conjunctival epithelial cell lines and one meibomian gland cell line, from different laboratories actively involved in ocular surface research. The samples were then subjected to STR analysis on a fee-for-service basis in an academic setting and the data compared against that in available databases.

Results: The STR profiles for the human corneal epithelial cells were different among the three cell lines studied and for each line the profiles were identical across the samples provided by three laboratories. Profiles for the human conjunctival epithelial cells were different among the two cell lines studied. Profiles for the meibomian gland cell line were identical across the samples provided by three laboratories. No samples were contaminated by elements of other cell lines such as HeLa.

Conclusions: This comprehensive study provides verification of STR profiles for commonly used human ocular surface cell lines that can now be used as a reference by others in the field to authenticate the cell lines in use in their own laboratories.

Keywords: Conjunctiva; cornea; epithelial; meibomian; short tandem repeat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no commercial or proprietary interest in any concept or product described in this article.

References

    1. Kaur G, Dufour JM. Cell lines Valuable tools or useless artifacts. Spermatogenesis. 2012; 2:1–5. -PMC -PubMed
    1. American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Organization Workgroup ASN-0002. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:441–448. -PubMed
    1. Capes-Davis A, Theodosopoulos G, Atkin I, Drexler HG, Kohara A, MacLeod RAF et al. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:1–8. -PubMed
    1. Marx V Cell-line authentication demystified. Nat Methods. 2014;11: 483–488. -PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Liu Y, Zheng C, Shen C. Identification of cross-contamination and misidentification of 278 widely used tumor cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170384. -PMC -PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources