WDFY4 is required for cross-presentation in response to viral and tumor antigens - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2018 Nov 9;362(6415):694-699.
doi: 10.1126/science.aat5030.
Jesse T Davidson 4th # 1 2, Carlos G Briseño 1, Marco Gargaro 3, Elvin J Lauron 4, Qiuling Wang 5, Pritesh Desai 1 5, Vivek Durai 1, Prachi Bagadia 1, Joshua R Brickner 1, Wandy L Beatty 5, Herbert W Virgin 1 6, William E Gillanders 2 7, Nima Mosammaparast 1, Michael S Diamond 1 5 8 9, L David Sibley 5, Wayne Yokoyama 4, Robert D Schreiber 1 9, Theresa L Murphy 1, Kenneth M Murphy 10 11
Affiliations
- PMID: 30409884
- PMCID: PMC6655551
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aat5030
WDFY4 is required for cross-presentation in response to viral and tumor antigens
Derek J Theisen et al. Science. 2018.
Abstract
During the process of cross-presentation, viral or tumor-derived antigens are presented to CD8+ T cells by _Batf3-_dependent CD8α+/XCR1+ classical dendritic cells (cDC1s). We designed a functional CRISPR screen for previously unknown regulators of cross-presentation, and identified the BEACH domain-containing protein WDFY4 as essential for cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens by cDC1s in mice. However, WDFY4 was not required for major histocompatibility complex class II presentation, nor for cross-presentation by monocyte-derived dendritic cells. In contrast to Batf3 -/- mice, Wdfy4 -/- mice displayed normal lymphoid and nonlymphoid cDC1 populations that produce interleukin-12 and protect against Toxoplasma gondii infection. However, similar to Batf3 -/- mice, Wdfy4 -/- mice failed to prime virus-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo or induce tumor rejection, revealing a critical role for cross-presentation in antiviral and antitumor immunity.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Figures
Fig. 1.. Establishment of a CRISPR/Cas9 screen for cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens.
(A-C) Increasing concentrations of HKLM-OVA (A), soluble ovalbumin (B) or SIINFEKL peptide were cultured with sort-purified cDCland cDC2 for three days with CFSE-labeled OT-I T cells and assayed for proliferation (CFSE−CD44+). (D, E) WT or _Tap1_−/− sort-purified cDCl and cDC2 were cultured for three days with varying concentrations of HKLM-OVA (D) or soluble OVA (E) and CFSE-labeled OT-I T cells and assayed for proliferation (CFSE−CD44+). (F-G) Sorted cDCl were cultured with 100 μg/mL soluble ovalbumin (F) or 106 splenocytes osmotically loaded with OVA (G), cultured for 48 hours and stained with 25-D1.16 and analyzed by flow cytometry. (H) CFSE-labeled OT-I cells were cultured with the indicated number of whole Flt3L-generated DCs and 107 HKLM-OVA or 25 fg/mL SIINFEKL peptide (SIIN) and proliferation measured as in (A). (I) c-Kithi bone marrow progenitors from Cas9 transgenic mice were infected with retroviruses expressing various sgRNAs (Supplementary Table 2), cultured with Flt3L for seven days, and infected cDCs tested for cross-presentation to CFSE-labeled OT-I T cells as in (H), Sc=Scramble. Activated T cells gated as CFSE−CD44+. For all figures data indicate mean ±SEM. For all figures, statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P<0.05; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001
Fig. 2.. Wdfy4 is selectively required for cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens by cDC1.
(A) Cross-presentation was measured for Cas9-transgenic cDCl expressing two sgRNA (1 and 2; middle and bottom) for Wdfy4 or a scramble control (top) that were generated as described in (Fig. 1I). T cell proliferation shown by percentages of CFSE− OT-I cells. (B) Cross-presentation by cDCl expressing sgRNAs for Wdfy1, Wdfy2, Wdfy3 and Wdfy4 was measured as described in (Fig. 1I). Scr=Scramble. Activated T cells gated as CFSE−CD44+. Data indicate mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (C) cDC1 and cDC2 development was assessed by flow cytometry in WT, _Wdfy4_−/− and _Batf3_−/− mice, plots were pre-gated as B220−CD11c+MHCII+ and then gated as cDC1 (XCR1+Sirpα−) or cDC2 (XCR1−Sirpα+). (D) absolute cell numbers of cDC1 and cDC2 in WT and _Wdfy4_−/− mice. Each dot indicates one mouse, bar indicates mean. (E) FACS sorted cDC1 and cDC2 from spleens of WT and _Wdfy4_−/− mice were assayed for presentation to OT-I (CFSE−CD44+) in response to the indicated concentrations of HKLM-OVA. (F) FACS sorted cDC1 and cDC2 from spleens of bone marrow chimeric mice with WT or _Wdfy4_−/− bone marrow were assayed for presentation to OT-I (CFSE−CD44+) in response to indicated concentrations of OVA-loaded irradiated splenocytes from MHCI TKO mice. A negative control of splenocytes osmotically pulsed in the absence of OVA, OVA-, was included (G) FACS sorted cDC1 and cDC2 from spleens of WT and _Wdfy4_−/− mice were assayed for presentation to OT-I (CFSE−CD44+) in response to indicated concentrations of soluble OVA. (H) FACS sorted cDC1 and cDC2 from spleens of WT and _Wdfy4_−/− mice were assayed for presentation to OT-II (CFSE−CD44+) in response to indicated concentrations of OVA-loaded irradiated splenocytes from MHCII KO mice. A negative control of splenocytes osmotically pulsed in the absence of OVA, OVA-, was included. For all figures, data indicate mean ±SEM for three independent experiments, *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001 using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Fig. 3.. WDFY4 acts near the plasma membrane and associates with proteins involved in localization and vesicular transport.
(A) Diagram of truncated fragments of WDFY4 protein, showing predicted domains within FL4 fragment. Numbers indicate amino-acid locations of fragments. (B) ClueGO visualization of gene ontology terms enriched after immunoprecipitation of fragments from (A) in the mouse DC line JAWSII, expressing either FL1 or FL2 fragments. Small circles P<.001, large circles P<.0001. Colors indicate Gene Ontology (GO) term groups. (C) ClueGO visualization of gene ontology terms enriched after immunoprecipitation of fragments from (A) in the mouse DC line JAWSII expressing either FL3 or FL4 fragments. Small circles P<3×10−5, large circles P<3×10−6. Colors indicate GO term groups. (D) Scatterplot of representative data for sum intensity of proteins found after mass spectrometry between FL4 expressing and empty-vector expressing JAWSII cells. (E) Western blot of Flag immunoprecipitates from HEK293 cells transfected with empty-vector or Flag-tagged WDFY4 fragments 1 to 4 (top), and input control for β-actin (bottom) (F) Western blot for endogenous Hsp90 in Flag immunoprecipitates from HEK293 transfected with empty-vector or Flag-tagged WDFY4 fragments 1 to 4 (top) and input control for endogenous Hsp90 (bottom) (G) Confocal microscopy of JAWSII cells overexpressing full length Twin-Strep-tagged WDFY4, stained for anti-Strep (green), various cellular markers (red), and DAPI (blue). Scale bars indicate 5μm. (H) Quantification of co-localization between WDFY4 and intracellular markers from images in (G), each dot represents one cell, bar indicates the mean.
Fig. 4.. _Wdfy4_−/− mice are unable to cross-present in vivo
(A-B) Representative flow cytometry analysis of in vivo cross-presentation to 500K irradiated splenocytes loaded with OVA injected i.v. into mice of the indicated genotypes one day after injection of 500K CFSE-labeled OT-I cells. Mice were harvested three days after antigen injection, quantified in (B). Data pre-gated on OT-I cells and shown as percentage of CFSE− cells (A) or CFSE−CD44+ cells (B). Data are pooled from three independent experiments; each point represents one mouse. (C) Survival of mice of the indicated genotypes to injection of 200 Pru.luc T. gondii tachyzoites over 30 days. WDFY4+/− n=9, _WDFY4_−/− n=8, _Batf3_−/− n=3. (D-E) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD8 T cells (pre-gate CD4−CD3+CD8+) in lungs of naïve or cowpox infected mice, quantified in (E). Each dot represents one mouse, bar indicates mean. (F) Mice of the indicated genotypes were injected with 1×106 fibrosarcoma cells s.c. and tumors were measured daily starting at day three after injection. (G) Mixed bone marrow chimeras with bone marrow of indicated genotypes were injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1+ WT B6 mice. Eight weeks later, mice were injected with 1×106 fibrosarcoma cells s.c. and tumors were measured daily starting at day three after injection. Data show mean ± SEM of 9 mice per group. (H) Quantification of cDC1 in tumors at either day 6 or day 21 after injection taken from mice of indicated genotypes. Gated as B220−CD11c+MHCII+CD103+CD11b−. Each dot indicates one mouse, bar indicates mean. (I) Quantification of CD8 T cells in tumors at either day 6 or day 21 after injection taken from mice of indicated genotypes. Gated as CD45+TCRβ+CD8α+CD4−. Each dot indicates one mouse, bar indicates mean. For all figures, ** P<.01; **** P<0.0001 using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Comment in
- A key ingredient for priming killer T cells.
Barbet G, Blander JM. Barbet G, et al. Science. 2018 Nov 9;362(6415):641-642. doi: 10.1126/science.aav3683. Science. 2018. PMID: 30409872 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- An Important Role for CD4+ T Cells in Adaptive Immunity to Toxoplasma gondii in Mice Lacking the Transcription Factor Batf3.
Tussiwand R, Behnke MS, Kretzer NM, Grajales-Reyes GE, Murphy TL, Schreiber RD, Murphy KM, Sibley LD. Tussiwand R, et al. mSphere. 2020 Jul 15;5(4):e00634-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00634-20. mSphere. 2020. PMID: 32669460 Free PMC article. - CD8α+ DCs can be induced in the absence of transcription factors Id2, Nfil3, and Batf3.
Seillet C, Jackson JT, Markey KA, Brady HJ, Hill GR, Macdonald KP, Nutt SL, Belz GT. Seillet C, et al. Blood. 2013 Feb 28;121(9):1574-83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-445650. Epub 2013 Jan 7. Blood. 2013. PMID: 23297132 - CD8α(+) dendritic cells are the critical source of interleukin-12 that controls acute infection by Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites.
Mashayekhi M, Sandau MM, Dunay IR, Frickel EM, Khan A, Goldszmid RS, Sher A, Ploegh HL, Murphy TL, Sibley LD, Murphy KM. Mashayekhi M, et al. Immunity. 2011 Aug 26;35(2):249-59. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.008. Immunity. 2011. PMID: 21867928 Free PMC article. - Dendritic Cells and CD8 T Cell Immunity in Tumor Microenvironment.
Fu C, Jiang A. Fu C, et al. Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;9:3059. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03059. eCollection 2018. Front Immunol. 2018. PMID: 30619378 Free PMC article. Review. - Concise review: The heterogenous roles of BATF3 in cancer oncogenesis and dendritic cells and T cells differentiation and function considering the importance of BATF3-dependent dendritic cells.
Dabbaghipour R, Ahmadi E, Entezam M, Farzam OR, Sohrabi S, Jamali S, Sichani AS, Paydar H, Baradaran B. Dabbaghipour R, et al. Immunogenetics. 2024 Apr;76(2):75-91. doi: 10.1007/s00251-024-01335-x. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Immunogenetics. 2024. PMID: 38358555 Review.
Cited by
- Formulating a TMEM176B blocker in chitosan nanoparticles uncouples its paradoxical roles in innate and adaptive antitumoral immunity.
Victoria S, Castro A, Pittini A, Olivera D, Russo S, Cebrian I, Mombru AW, Osinaga E, Pardo H, Segovia M, Hill M. Victoria S, et al. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Nov;279(Pt 3):135327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135327. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024. PMID: 39236955 - Optimization of the Irf8 +32-kb enhancer disrupts dendritic cell lineage segregation.
Ou F, Liu TT, Desai P, Ferris ST, Kim S, Shen H, Ohara RA, Jo S, Chen J, Postoak JL, Du S, Diamond MS, Murphy TL, Murphy KM. Ou F, et al. Nat Immunol. 2024 Nov;25(11):2043-2056. doi: 10.1038/s41590-024-01976-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7. Nat Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39375550 - Dendritic cells as orchestrators of anticancer immunity and immunotherapy.
Heras-Murillo I, Adán-Barrientos I, Galán M, Wculek SK, Sancho D. Heras-Murillo I, et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr;21(4):257-277. doi: 10.1038/s41571-024-00859-1. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38326563 Review. - Once upon a prime: DCs shape cancer immunity.
Zagorulya M, Spranger S. Zagorulya M, et al. Trends Cancer. 2023 Feb;9(2):172-184. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Nov 7. Trends Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36357313 Free PMC article. Review. - In Vitro Generation of Murine CD8α+ DEC205+ XCR1+ Cross-Presenting Dendritic Cells from Bone Marrow-Derived Hematopoietic Progenitors.
Kirkling ME, Reizis B. Kirkling ME, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2618:109-119. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2938-3_8. Methods Mol Biol. 2023. PMID: 36905512
References
- Crozat K, Tamoutounour S, Vu Manh TP, Fossum E, Luche H, Ardouin L, Guilliams M, Azukizawa H, Bogen B, Malissen B, Henri S, Dalod M, Cutting edge: expression of XCR1 defines mouse lymphoid-tissue resident and migratory dendritic cells of the CD8alpha+ type J.Immunol. 187, 4411–4415 (2011). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- T32 CA009621/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AR073752/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- F30 DK108498/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA193318/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI007163/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- U19 AI109948/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA091842/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK020579/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U19 AI109725/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA190700/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U42 OD011185/OD/NIH HHS/United States
- HHMI/Howard Hughes Medical Institute/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials