Hospitalists' Needs Assessment and Perceived Barriers in Wound Care Management: A Quality Improvement Project - PubMed (original) (raw)

Hospitalists' Needs Assessment and Perceived Barriers in Wound Care Management: A Quality Improvement Project

Cynthia A Walker et al. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and perspectives related to management of pressure injuries and neuropathic/diabetic foot complications (having a foot ulcer or subsequent development of a foot infection because of a foot ulcer). We also sought to identify resources for and knowledge-based barriers to management of these wounds. This quality improvement effort targeted an interdisciplinary group of 55 hospitalists in internal medicine that consisted of 8 nurse practitioners, 10 physician assistants, and 38 physicians. The site of this initiative was the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, a 342-bed academic hospital located in the mid-Atlantic United States (Baltimore Maryland). The first phase of our quality improvement project comprised an online survey to identify hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and opinions on inpatient management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. The second phase involved semistructured focus groups attended by hospitalists to identify resource gaps and barriers inferred by survey results. Twenty-nine of 55 (52%) hospitalists responded to the survey; 72% indicated no formal training in wound care. Over 90% had little to no confidence in management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. In a separate ranking section of the survey, respondents selected lack of knowledge/confidence 12 of 29 (41.3%) and resources 9 of 29 (31.0%) as number 1 barriers to wound care. Managing patients with obesity was identified as a second major barrier from 10 of 29 selected options (34.5%). Eighteen of 55 (33%) hospitalists attended focus group sessions acknowledging barriers to wound care that included provider education, information technology, system factors, and interprofessional engagement. Attendees welcomed additional educational and ancillary resource support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/pressureulcertoolkit.... Published October 2014. Accessed: September 8, 2018.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAc.... Published July 2018. Accessed: September 8, 2018.
    1. Zhang P, Lu J, Jing Y, Tang S, Zhu D, Bi Y. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med 2017. March;49(2):106–116. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932. Epub 2016 Nov 3. Review. -DOI -PubMed
    1. Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons. Burden of Diabetic foot Ulcers for Medicare and Private Insurers. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct; DC_132176. -PubMed
    1. Morbach S, Furchert H, Gröblinghoff U, et al. Long-term prognosis of diabetic foot patients and their limbs: amputation and death over the course of a decade. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2021–2027. -PMC -PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources