Quality of Care for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Lupus Nephritis Across Multiple Health Care Settings - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2020 Jul;72(7):888-896.
doi: 10.1002/acr.23915. Epub 2020 May 14.
Affiliations
- PMID: 31058460
- PMCID: PMC6832767
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.23915
Quality of Care for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Lupus Nephritis Across Multiple Health Care Settings
Ishita Aggarwal et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jul.
Abstract
Objective: We examined quality measures for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) among participants of the California Lupus Epidemiology Study across 25 different clinical sites to identify gaps in quality of care.
Methods: Data from 250 participants with lupus were analyzed across 3 sources (medical records, physician examination, and patient interviews). Overall performance on 8 quality measures was calculated separately for participants with and without LN. We used generalized estimating equations in which the outcome was performance on measures, adjusting for participant demographics, lupus disease severity, and practice characteristics.
Results: Of 148 patients without LN, 42% underwent screening laboratory tests for nephritis, 38% underwent lupus activity serum studies, and 81% had their blood pressure checked every 6 months. Of 102 LN patients, 67% had a timely kidney biopsy, at least 81% had appropriate treatment, and 78% achieved target blood pressure within 1 year of diagnosis. Overall performance in participants across quality measures was 54% (no LN) and 80% (LN). Significantly higher overall performance for screening measures for LN was seen at academic (63.4-73%) versus community clinics (37.9-38.4%). Similarly, among those with LN, higher performance in academic (84.1-85.2%) versus community clinics (54.8-60.2%) was observed for treatment measures.
Conclusion: In this quality-of-care analysis across 25 diverse clinical settings, we found relatively high performance on measures for management of LN. However, future work should focus on bridging the gaps in lupus quality of care for patients without nephritis, particularly in community settings.
© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.
Figures
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection of study participants
References
- Maroz N, Segal MS. Lupus nephritis and end-stage kidney disease. Am J Med Sci 2013;346:319–23. -PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- K24 AR074534/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DP006486/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- P30 AR070155/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- K24-AR074534/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DP005120/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States