Effect of wildfire on the prevalence of opioid misuse through anxiety among young adults in the United States: A modeling study - PubMed (original) (raw)

Effect of wildfire on the prevalence of opioid misuse through anxiety among young adults in the United States: A modeling study

Sigal Maya et al. Res Sq. 2024.

Update in

Abstract

Background: Exposure to climate change events like wildfires can lead to health and mental health problems. While conceptual frameworks have been hypothesized describing the potential relationship between disaster exposure and substance use, the association remains under-researched and unquantified.

Methods: We constructed a quantitative portrayal of one proposed conceptual framework that focuses on the intermediary role of anxiety. We used the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the impact of wildfire exposure on opioid misuse outcomes through increased anxiety. We searched for and extracted prior empirical evidence on the associations between wildfire anxiety and anxiety-opioid misuse. A base case scenario (S1) was devised in which the impact of wildfire on opioid misuse was limited to increasing anxiety incidence. Two exploratory scenarios investigated the additive roles of altered anxiety phenotype (S2) and increased severity of pre-existing anxiety (S3) due to wildfire exposure.

Results: Models show that the prevalence of opioid misuse post-wildfire may rise to 6.0%-7.2%. In S1 (base case), the opioid misuse prevalence ratio was 1.12 (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 1.00 - 1.27). The two exploratory scenarios, with less stringent assumptions, yielded prevalence ratios of 1.23 (95% UI: 1.00 - 1.51) and 1.34 (95% UI: 1.11 - 1.63).

Conclusions: Our modeling study suggests that exposure to wildfires may elevate opioid misuse through increasing anxiety incidence and severity. This may lead to substantial health burdens that may persist long after the initial wildfire event, which may offset recent gains in opioid misuse prevention.

Keywords: anxiety; opioid use; substance use; wildfire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Conceptual framework of the relationship between wildfire experience, anxiety, and opioid misuse.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Probability density functions for the prevalence (left) and risk ratio (right) for opioid misuse among those exposed to a wildfire. Scenario 1 limits the impact of wildfire on opioid misuse to increasing anxiety incidence. Scenario 2 additionally incorporates a greater tendency for opioid misuse in incident anxiety. Scenario 3 further incorporates increased severity of pre-existing anxiety.

References

    1. Dodgen D, Donato D, Kelly N, La Greca A, Morganstein J, Reser J, Ruzek J, Schweitzer S, Shimamoto MM, Thigpen Tart K et al. : Ch. 8: Mental Health and Well-Being. In: The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. edn. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program; 2016: 217–246.
    1. Charlson F, Ali S, Benmarhnia T, Pearl M, Massazza A, Augustinavicius J, Scott JG: Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18(9):4486. -PMC -PubMed
    1. Clayton S, Manning CM, Krygsman K, Speiser M: Mental Health and Our Changing Climate: Impacts, Implications, and Guidance. In. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica; 2017.
    1. Palinkas LA, Wong M: Global climate change and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology 2020, 32:12–16. -PubMed
    1. Hayes K, Blashki G, Wiseman J, Burke S, Reifels L: Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions. Int J Mental Health Systems 2018, 12(1):28. -PMC -PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources