Surgical Capacity Assessment and Leverage in the Palestinian Land (SCALPEL-I) Study: The First Nationwide Plastic Surgery Capacity Evaluation in Palestine - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2024 Nov 20;12(11):e6265.

doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006265. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Laith Ayasa 2, Mohammed Alhabil 3, Shahd Idais 2, Ayah Almzayyen 3, Majdeddin MohammedAli 4, Reem Younes 5, Heba Alghoul 6, Muath Alser 7, Bryce Stash 6, Roba Khundkar 8, Timothy Goodacre 9, Amanda Gosman 10, Andrea Pusic 11, Deepak Bharadia 6

Affiliations

Surgical Capacity Assessment and Leverage in the Palestinian Land (SCALPEL-I) Study: The First Nationwide Plastic Surgery Capacity Evaluation in Palestine

Osaid Alser et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024.

Abstract

Background: Access to surgical care in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in war-torn areas such as the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), is a global health priority. The plastic surgical capacity in the oPt has not been evaluated. This study provides the first systematic evaluation of plastic surgical capacity in the oPt.

Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted between December 2022 and February 2023 included facilities providing plastic surgery services in the oPt, except private centers run by nonsurgeons. A modified PIPES (personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment, and supplies) tool was used. Data were analyzed for geographic and private/public disparities.

Results: Eleven facilities were included; 6 (54.5%) were in the West Bank and 5 (45.5%) in Gaza. The majority were private hospitals (n = 6, 54.5%). The mean PIPES score was personnel = 4.3 (4.03), infrastructure = 18.4 (2.4), procedures = 9.8 (3.8), equipment = 19.2 (3.6), and supplies = 22.4 (1.9). Hospital beds, operating rooms, and plastic surgeons per 100,000 people were 33.5, 1.0, and 0.5, respectively. There were 8 board-certified plastic surgeons. No facilities had a plastic surgery residency program. Key deficiencies included: 8 facilities (72.2%) not performing microsurgical free tissue transfers (none in Gaza), 5 (45.5%) lacking a system to identify complications, and 7 (63.3%) not offering regular educational courses. Average power supply was 8.0 hours/day in Gaza and 24.0 hours/day in the West Bank.

Conclusions: Plastic surgical capacity in the oPt shows significant deficiencies, especially in Gaza. These findings should inform stakeholders to address disparities, develop training programs, and improve access to safe plastic surgery.

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Map showing the total PIPES scores across the governorates in the occupied Palestinian territories.

References

    1. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386:569–624. -PubMed
    1. Price R, Makasa E, Hollands M. World Health Assembly Resolution WHA68.15: “strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage”—addressing the public health gaps arising from lack of safe, affordable and accessible surgical and anesthetic services. World J Surg. 2015;39:2115–2125. -PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO tool for situational analysis to assess emergency and essential surgical care. Available at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/integrated-health-services-(ihs).... Accessed November 23, 2023. -PMC -PubMed
    1. Surgeons OverSeas. PIPES assessment tool. Available at https://www.adamkushnermd.com/files/PIPES_tool_103111.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2023.
    1. Groen RS, Kamara TB, Dixon-Cole R, et al. A tool and index to assess surgical capacity in low income countries: an initial implementation in Sierra Leone. World J Surg. 2012;36:1970–1977. -PubMed

LinkOut - more resources