homeless – Techdirt (original) (raw)
DOJ Announces Investigation Of Phoenix PD's Use Of Excessive Force And Abuse Of Homeless People
from the information-and-belief-on-top-of-patterns-and-practices dept
With a new Attorney General in charge and a new President in the White House, the Department of Justice is getting back to taking care of the uncomfortable business of investigating local law enforcement agencies. This part of the DOJ’s responsibilities was largely abandoned under Trump, who opened up his presidency by declaring he would “end” the “dangerous anti-police atmosphere.”
Trump actually made it worse. His enthusiastic support for police and police violence did nothing to discourage the sorts of actions that create “anti-police atmosphere.” Concurrently, the DOJ — under AGs Sessions and Barr — looked the other way as law enforcement agencies engaged in activities that violated the rights of the public.
The latest law enforcement agency to under the DOJ’s scope is the Phoenix, Arizona police department. The Phoenix PD last made news here at Techdirt after its union offered cops access to paid service that would “scrub” social media services of their posts. This was deployed in reaction to multiple investigations opened all around the nation after transparency activist group Plainview Project was able to link bigoted and violent social media posts to current law employment officers.
There are some specifics to this investigation that indicate some parts of the Phoenix PD’s enforcement efforts are more problematic than others.
This investigation will assess all types of use of force by PhxPD officers, including deadly force. The investigation will also seek to determine whether PhxPD engages in retaliatory activity against people for conduct protected by the First Amendment; whether PhxPD engages in discriminatory policing; and whether PhxPD unlawfully seizes or disposes of the belongings of individuals experiencing homelessness. In addition, the investigation will assess the City and PhxPD’s systems and practices for responding to people with disabilities. The investigation will include a comprehensive review of PhxPD policies, training, supervision, and force investigations, as well as PhxPD’s systems of accountability, including misconduct complaint intake, investigation, review, disposition, and discipline.
The city is also being investigated to see what culpability it carries for the PD’s anti-homeless actions. It appears the city (and the PD it employs) has been unwilling to obey court precedent finding certain policies unlawful.
A 2018 ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals banned cities from arresting or imposing fines on people sleeping in public places in the absence of meaningful housing alternatives.
As a result, local governments in western states have begun to reassess their urban camping ordinances. Among them are cities in Arizona like Glendale and Tempe, which have stopped enforcing urban camping laws.
But little has changed in Phoenix, said Elizabeth Venable, treasurer for the Fund for Empowerment.
Despite the court decision, the Phoenix Police Department is “doing the same thing they’ve always done,” said Venable.
The state appears to believe the proper solution to being on the wrong end of court decisions is to change the law. A new proposal would create sanctioned “camps” for homeless people while still allowing the state to punish homeless people for sleeping in public areas without permission.
The bill would authorize the state to create designated camping areas on state land with access to water, electricity and bathrooms where people experiencing homelessness could stay. Residents of the designated camping area may be required to attend substance abuse treatment or mental health services.
He said the camps would be similar to the temporary parking-lot shelters opened by Maricopa County last year to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Security would be provided at all camping areas.
The bill would prohibit homeless encampments anywhere else on state property.
Yes, this would create other options for temporary housing of homeless people. But it won’t do much to prevent police officers from harassing and arresting homeless people for simply existing in the wrong place at the wrong time. And it’s this leeway that appears to have led to this investigation — the encouragement of heavy-handed enforcement by city reps, which has manifested as the abuses the DOJ is now digging into.
Unfortunately for the DOJ, it may soon discover it doesn’t have a whole lot of information to work with. As was discovered by Justin Price of AZCentral last year, the city’s contract with the police union allows misconduct records to be destroyed almost at will.
Over 500 of the city’s 3,000 officers have had their pasts memory-holed by the union contract, covering over 600 misconduct incidents ranging from failure to complete reports to deployments of excessive force.
The purging prevents even internal investigators from discovering patterns of misconduct that should result in harsher discipline or termination. It also prevents plaintiffs suing officers over violated rights from obtaining key background info that could indicate an officer is a longtime abuser of citizens. In one case cited in Price’s report, the PD began purging an officer’s records as soon as the officer had been served.
Beyond the impediments posed by a lack of documentation, there’s the question of how much the DOJ can actually change by performing an investigation. At best, it prevents law enforcement agencies from claiming any abuses uncovered are just a matter of perception. At worst, it just forces agencies to keep their heads low for a while and wait for the DOJ (and the public’s interest) to head elsewhere.
It should be noted, however, that every closed DOJ investigation finds evidence of wrongdoing, usually of the “substantial” and “pervasive” varieties. By the time the DOJ decides to step in, the problem is generally too big to ignore. This means the agency being investigated is already aware of the problem but has done nothing to correct it. That mindset — one that views bad cops as victims of public perception — tends to stick around long after the DOJ has dropped off a consent decree and blown town.
Filed Under: doj, excessive force, homeless, investigation, police
NYC Kills Internet Browsing At Free WiFi Kiosks After The City's Homeless Actually Use It
from the better-neither-seen-nor-heard dept
Fri, Sep 16th 2016 08:24am - Karl Bode
Earlier this year, New York City undertook one of the biggest free city WiFi efforts ever conceived. Under the plan, an outfit by the name of LinkNYC is slated to install some 7,500 WiFi kiosks scattered around the five boroughs that will provide free gigabit WiFi (well, closer to 300 Mbps or so), free phone calls to anywhere in the country (via Vonage), as well as access to a device recharging station, 311, 911, 411 and city services (via an integrated Android tablet). The connectivity and services are supported by a rotating crop of ads displayed on the kiosks themselves.
The only problem? As part of the initiative, the city and LinkNYC attached an Android-powered tablet that lets anyone browse the internet for as long as they wanted. This, as you might expect, has resulted in some people camping out for long periods of time actually using the free service. That includes, unsurprisingly, New York City’s ample homeless population. As Motherboard notes in a report, after spending much of August tracking usage of the kiosks, a snapshot view of daily use doesn’t make for shiny marketing fodder:
“My small sample of Link users that Saturday afternoon suggests these kiosks are indeed mostly used by the city?s least privileged. Of the 15 people I saw using a Link, only two or three of them would be likely to appear on LinkNYC promotional materials (i.e., one well-dressed woman making a phone call, or one middle aged, casually-dressed tourist waiting for his phone to finish charging).
Again, this shouldn’t really be surprising, especially since the city has consistently claimed that one of its goals is to close the digital divide. Since June there has also been a lot of breathless hysteria about the fact that some of the homeless users have been using the tablets to watch porn. In response, LinkNYC began implementing internet filters that, as internet filters tend to do, didn’t seem to work.
Responding to public complaints, LinkNYC announced this week that it would be discontinuing tablet browsing functionality at the kiosks:
“…Some users have been monopolizing the Link tablets and using them inappropriately, preventing others from being able to use them while frustrating the residents and businesses around them. The kiosks were never intended for anyone?s extended, personal use and we want to ensure that Links are accessible and a welcome addition to New York City neighborhoods.
The announcement notes that the internet browsing will be disabled, but other services will still work:
“Starting today, we will be removing web browsing on all Link tablets while we work with the City and community to explore potential solutions, like time limits. Other tablet features?free phone calls, maps, device charging, and access to 311 and 911?will continue to work as they did before, and nothing is changing about LinkNYC?s superfast Wi-Fi. As planned, we will continue to improve the Link experience and add new features for people to enjoy while they?re on the go.”
While countless news stories suggest that the move was primarily in response to overwhelming porn consumption, there’s no real evidence that this was an epidemic of any real scale. While there have certainly been documented instances of public masterbation at the kiosks (this is NYC after all, and occasionally viewing a homeless person’s gentials is not a new concept), LinkNYC has suggested that people camping out around the kiosks (sometimes bringing chairs, couches and crates with them) was the larger source of complaints by locals.
The real problem appears to be that the service put the city’s homeless population on stark display, making them more difficult for city residents to ignore. On one hand it’s understandable that homeless populations camping around the kiosks isn’t great “optics” or olfactory ambiance for the city and local business owners, but at the same time it’s not clear what one expects to happen when you provide the city’s 60,000 homeless residents with free access to technology they otherwise lack access to. LinkNYC says it’s working with the city on a solution, and may restore public browsing at a later date with tougher filters and access limitations in place. Given the fact that filters historically don’t work, it seems more likely that the free browsing will be gone for good.
Filed Under: homeless, kiosks, new york city, nyc, porn, wifi
NY Post Craps On NYC's Plan To Offer Free Wi-Fi — Because The Homeless Might Watch Porn
from the worry-wart dept
Tue, Jun 21st 2016 06:23am - Karl Bode
As you might have heard, New York City recently launched one of the biggest free Wi-Fi initiatives ever conceived. Under the program, some 7,500 Wi-Fi kiosks will provide gigabit Wi-Fi, free phone calls to anywhere in the country (via Vonage), as well as access to a device recharging station, 311, 911, 411 and city services (via an integrated Android tablet). The city is installing ten a day — most at old payphone locations — and hopes to have 500 of the kiosks in place by July. It’s a pretty impressive effort, and by most measures providing fast, free connectivity to the city’s five boroughs has been something to celebrate.
Unless you’re the New York Post, which decided to spend precious calories this week worrying about how the system potentially lets the city’s homeless population watch porn:
“…The plan badly backfired when scores of homeless men ? and some schoolchildren ? soon realized they could surf porn sites all day on the city?s dime using the communal Android-run tablets and gratis Wi-Fi.”
Of course the Post kind of floats over the amazing fact that the kiosks let everybody in the city access any information they want at any time, but the Post also fails to really offer any evidence that there’s waves upon waves of masturbating homeless brigands terrifying city residents. In fact the story proceeds to note that the company behind the initiative, LinkNYC, has already ramped up filtering of pornographic websites to at least make it a little more difficult. In fact there’s really not much of any meat to the clams the city’s plan “backfired” at all, outside of a quote from an indignant out of towner:
“I used to come here in the ?70s, and I remember thinking Times Square was as skeezy as you could get, but I was wrong,? said former New Yorker Richard Herzberg, 61, who now lives in Dallas, Texas. “This is as skeezy as Times Square could get. I mean, in the old days there was plenty of porn, but you could only see it behind closed doors. So at least there was that level of modesty.”
While the Post would apparently prefer it if we dismantled a useful, citywide Wi-Fi network to fix a nonexistent or relatively minor problem, it’s worth remembering that masturbating in public remains a criminal offense, making the fact that it’s happening at a free Wi-Fi pylon somewhat irrelevant. And while there’s an argument to be made for loss of city character as New York evolved from punk rock minefield to glorified shopping mall, city residents that remember the apocalyptic nature of 70s and 80s NYC likely see sporadic homeless porn consumption as the very least of the city’s worries.
Filed Under: free wifi, homeless, new york, nyc, porn, times square, wifi
NYPD Sergeants Assoc. Using Flickr To Publicly Humiliate Homeless To Play Politics With Mayor De Blasio
from the cheap-shots dept
Let’s say you’re a leader in an association for NYPD sergeants. Now let’s say you’re, like, super aware of some of the changes and backlash against the NYPD that has occurred recently, chiefly concerning policies for policing the public, charges of racist and violent practices, and the insistance that the city government find ways to keep officers accountable for their actions. You know the city is looking into NYPD officials deleting information on illegal summons quotas. You know of the concern over the fact that the NYPD has pissed off so many black men that black men kind of don’t want to join their ranks. And you’re especially aware of the trend of greater protections for the public filming police doing their jobs and the crackdown on the crackdown of the photographers. What do you do?
Psshh, start a Flickr account solely for the purpose of poor-shaming the homeless to try and embarrass the Mayor, right?
The Sergeants Benevolent Association is spearheading the effort, emailing a letter to members Monday urging them and their families and friends to take pictures to document the decline of the city.
“As you travel about the city of New York, please utilize your smartphones to photograph the homeless lying in our streets, aggressive panhandlers, people urinating in public or engaging in open-air drug activity, and quality-of-life offenses of every type,” says the letter from SBA President Ed Mullins, a major critic of Mayor Bill de Blasio.
Yes, Mullins (and the ironically named Sergeants Benevolent Association) then takes those photographs and uploads them to its Flickr account, because apparently the best way to make a political point to a political opponent is to publicly shame the least able to defend themselves. Should you not wish to view this material, something for which I wouldn’t blame you, the pictures almost uniformly show homeless and vagrant folk in their own misery, often captioned with such wonderfully sympathetic thoughts as “Quality Of Life For The Mayor” and “Peek A Boo” and “Homeless Takeover NYC.” The idea of shaming the homeless, who might be homeless for any number of reasons, is deplorable. As are Mullins’ excuses for doing so.
Noting that more cops are being recorded on the job, Mullins wrote, “Shouldn’t accountability go both ways? We, the ‘Good Guys,’ are sworn to protect our citizens. Shouldn’t our public officials be held to the same standard?” he said.
Except the two things aren’t remotely equivalent. The public photographing the police performing their duties while serving that very same public isn’t the same as snapshotting a 3rd party whose lives are already miserable to take political shots against the Mayor. Frankly, these are the kinds of things said by those with head injuries, not those leading a police association. More specifically, Mullins claims this is being done in response to pending city legislation that would require police to obtain permission to search a suspect if they don’t have probable cause for an arrest. You know, that thing that’s already in the goddamn Constitution? Yeah, that’s why he’s encouraging police to publicly shame the homeless.
Get a grip, guys…
Filed Under: bill de blasio, homeless, mayor, nyc, nypd, photographs, police, seargents benevolent association, shaming
Portland Police Bravely Defend Public From Homeless Woman Looking To Charge Her Cell Phone
from the real-american-heroes dept
Police: they have a job that demands respect, even if those doing the job occassionally do not. We talk a great deal here at Techdirt about some of the frightening uses of military grade equipment by local law enforcement agencies, about what sometimes seems like a neverending list of civil rights abuses, and so on. Still, as I said, I respect the job. It’s my respect for that job that leads me to think that the Portland cops who arrested a homeless woman for charging her phone on a public outlet need a greater understanding of what it is exactly that police in this stupid country are supposed to do.
Now, if you’re thinking to yourself, “There’s no way police in Portland arrested a person just for plugging her cell phone charger into a public outlet,” well, you’re correct; they arrested two people for that in one trip.
In this case, the theft was first reported by Portland Patrol Inc., and two Portland police officers followed up to issue the woman and her co-defendant, a homeless man who was also charging his cellphone at the planter box outlet, citations to appear in court for third-degree theft of services — a Class C misdemeanor. According to the Electrical Research Institute, it costs about 25 cents a year to charge the average mobile phone. If the phone in this scenario had gone from zero charge to full charge, the cost would have amounted to mere fractions of a penny.
“Jackie,” (who did not want her real name used), says she was shocked when four uniformed officers all agreed her actions warranted not only their response, but also charges and a court summons.
Let’s play a quick game. Pick out which part of the pull quote above is the most ridiculous aspect of this story. Got it? You picked the part where the homeless woman and a homeless man were charged with theft for plugging in their phones to a public outlet, didn’t you? Well, you’re wrong. That is ridiculous, of course, but any single police officer might be some asshole idiot capable of being this dumb. No, the most ridiculous part of the above pull quote is that it took four goddamned officers to respond to this request, and they still reached the conclusion that a citation was warranted. If these aren’t verified to be the four dimmest officers on Portland’s force, then the entire city has much larger problems.
Oh, and should you be waiting to jump into the comments with some snarky question about why a homeless woman should have a cell phone in the first place, please keep in mind that phones cost less than houses. Also, shut up. Because strictly from the point of view of safety, not to mention the hopes of having any kind of future employment or way to communicate with social services, a cell phone at this point is so necessary for the homeless, not to mention everyone else, that the government should probably be furnishing everyone with some kind of holographic communciations and record-keeping tool that appears on your forearm when needed.
Pictured: a homeless person in President Geigner’s America
Now, the Jackie in this story has never before been convicted of a crime, but she missed her court date after losing her citation because, well, where the shit is she going to put it? It’s not like she’s got a damned file cabinet stocked up in the house she doesn’t own. Knowing she missed the court date, Jackie turned herself in to the police and ended up being booked into jail. Keep in mind, if you can, that this is all over “stealing” electricity at levels of “fractions of a penny.” Jackie is on several waiting lists for assisted housing and might actually want to work someplace in the future, but, if convicted, she’ll always have to be checking that “been convicted of a crime” box now on applications, thanks to a dumb law and four brave boys in blue.
And don’t think that this is a completely isolated incident, either.
Jackie’s was not an isolated incident. Public defender Jane Fox says she’s seen similar cases.
“It doesn’t happen very often, but when it does, it’s just insane,” says Fox. “The (case) that I had was somebody charging their phone by the Greyhound bus station. Don’t you have a reasonable expectation that an outlet near the bus station would be OK?”
Only if you thought there was such a thing as common sense, which is clearly in short enough supply so as to no longer be common. As I said, I respect the job of the police, but I sure don’t respect the job that these four defenders of the public good managed to do. And just to wrap a nice bow on how stupid this all is, how much do you think the public is paying in tax money to prosecute Jackie’s fractions-of-a-penny theft? It seems likely that the paper the citation was written up on cost the taxpayers more than what she did, not to mention getting everyone in the court system involved. And, yet, Jackie’s the one stealing from taxpayers? Please…
Filed Under: charging, homeless, mobile phones, police, portland
A Rational Way To Dispose Of Counterfeit Designer Clothes: Donate Them To The Homeless
from the we'd-be-crazy-not-to dept
The narrative around counterfeit goods usually ends with their seizure. We rarely get to hear or see what happens to them afterwards unless some token burning or breaking is laid on for the cameras’ benefit. That makes the following story doubly noteworthy: we not only find out where fake designer clothes go after they have been seized in the UK, we discover that they are put to an excellent use:
> Instead of handing counterfeit designer clothes to customs or trading standards to be destroyed, they are being donated to a charity for redistribution to the homeless and vulnerable.
That charity is called His Church, and in the last six years it has managed to convince 90% of British Trading Standards Authorities, which have the job of dealing with counterfeit goods, to pass on the clothes for patching ? can’t leave those labels visible ? and then for redistribution. That’s good for the homeless people that receive them, and it’s good for the British government:
> Every year customs and trading standards spend a fortune on storing fake clothes while waiting for a court decision, and then once the items have been proved to be fake the authorities have to fork out further for incineration or landfill costs. > > His Church has removed all such costs and pass on the high quality goods to some 250 homeless centres and women’s shelters across the country.
This is such an obviously sensible thing to do you have to ask why the same approach isn’t more widely adopted. Presumably it’s from some residual fear that allowing fake clothes to circulate will “confuse” customers.
But as Techdirt has noted before, it’s likely that people know exactly what they are getting when they buy counterfeits, and that they are not confused in the slightest. Moreover, there’s no evidence that the sales of genuine designer clothes in the UK have suffered over the last six years as a result of all these fakes being allowed on to the streets: were there any, the scheme would certainly have been halted by now. So is there any good reason why other homeless and vulnerable people around the world shouldn’t benefit too?
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Filed Under: counterfeits, distribution, homeless, uk
God Wants Homeless People To Lobby The FCC To Help The Outcast & Downtrodden AT&T?
from the say-what-now? dept
For years we’ve talked about how various lobbyist organizations in DC have “special interest” front groups. These are groups who get attention from politicians but really have no interest in the policy matters at hand. However, because large companies have donated to those front groups, the lobbyists get to write up letters pretending to be from those groups, so they can pressure politicians who don’t want to “upset” a certain special interest group.
“You go down the Latino people, the deaf people, the farmers, and choose them…. You say, ‘I can’t use this one–I already used them last time…’ We had their letterhead. We’d just write the letter. We’d fax it to them and tell them, ‘You’re in favor of this.'”
Sometimes they don’t even bother getting permission, such as the time that a Burger King franchise wrote a letter complaining about the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Except, when a reporter called the franchise execs, they had no idea what the CFTC was. There was some actual backlash earlier this year when AT&T got the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) to come out in favor of its merger with T-Mobile, upsetting much of the membership, and leading a bunch of board members (including an AT&T lobbyist) to resign.
However, one small setback in such practices is no big deal when you have that big list of groups to go through. After “the Latino people, the deaf people, the farmers” apparently there are the religious homeless shelters. The Shreveport-Bossier Rescue Mission, proud recipients of a $50,000 donation from AT&T, has come out in favor of the merger with impeccably inscrutable logic:
The faith-based service provider offered what it acknowledged was ?an out-of-place endorsement? of the AT&T merger with T-Mobile, with Rev. R. Henry Martin explaining that ?People often call on God to help the outcasts and downtrodden that walk among us, [but] [s]ometimes, however, it is our responsibility to take matters into our own hands. Please support this merger.?
I’m still trying to figure out what that means. First, it seems to be suggesting that homeless people need to step up their game to support the “outcasts and downtrodden” AT&T and T-Mobile that “walk among us.” Because, um, otherwise, what does that refer to? The homeless people may be outcasts and downtrodden, but the shelter isn’t asking for any help for them.. but rather for AT&T and T-Mobile. I guess it also implies that God supports the merger but apparently God alone can’t convince the FCC, so apparently, if homeless folks could lobby and support one of the largest corporations around, that will be helpful.
Filed Under: fcc, god, homeless, lobbying, merger
Companies: at&t, t-mobile
Columbus Dispatch Issues Takedown On Famous YouTube Video Of Homeless Guy With Great Radio Voice
from the dumb-takedowns dept
Unless you’ve been under a rock the past week, you probably have heard about Ted Williams, the homeless guy in Columbus, Ohio, who panhandles off of a highway, but whose panhandling sign noted that he had an amazing radio voice. Someone from the Columbus Dispatch shot a short video of the guy showing off his voice, and after it went up on YouTube it went viral. Within days there were over a million views, and people were talking about how the guy really deserved a voice over job. The Cleveland Cavaliers offered him a job and apparently MSNBC has hired him to do some voiceover work. All that sounds good.
And then… despite the tons of views and positive attention… Mathew Ingram points us to the news that the Dispatch has issued a takedown on the video:
It’s difficult to understand what the Dispatch is thinking. It had such a great story here, all of which was credited to The Dispatch, and its response was to remove all of that goodwill by forcing the video offline.
Filed Under: columbus dispatch, homeless, radio voice, ted williams
NY Police Destroy Counterfeit Clothes Rather Than Giving Them To The Homeless
from the can't-let-that-destroy-the-brand dept
Last week there was a big controversy over the fact that some stores in NY were caught destroying unsold garments rather than donating them to charities. After people got upset, the main store in question, H&M promised that this wouldn’t happen again. This week we’ve got a related, but somewhat different story, as the NY Police have admitted to shredding and burning the counterfeit clothes they’ve confiscated, rather than giving them to the homeless, as had always been done in the past. When asked to explain why, the police claimed “no one asked” for the confiscated clothing — but many charities insist they had, in fact, made many requests for the clothing. Apparently, the destruction is being felt at clothing banks, who say they have many fewer clothes on hand this year than in the past.
Not surprisingly, a lawyer representing various clothing designers was quite happy with the news, saying that they don’t want those clothes “back on the street,” which suggests that the designers may have pushed for the police to destroy the clothes rather than help the needy. Of course, it’s worth pointing out — yet again — the recent study that showed most people are not fooled by counterfeits, and they rarely represent a “lost sale.” In fact, many counterfeit purchases lead to real purchases later on. So the idea that they act as a “substitute” or somehow “harm” a brand is not actually borne out by the research. And, of course, some companies have learned that there are ways to embrace counterfeiting to their own advantage, as a form of price differentiation.
Filed Under: clothing, counterfeiting, homeless, nypd, trademark
Can Someone Explain Why Google's Free Voicemail Offer Is Newsworthy?
from the it's-been-done,-it's-free-for-anyone-already dept
Google got a bunch of press earlier this week for giving out “free voicemail accounts” to the homeless. I tried to ignore the story, but it keeps getting written about, and it seemed like there were a few points worth making. First of all, this concept isn’t new. Almost five years ago, we wrote about Cisco doing the same thing. There’s a whole organization, called Community Voicemail, that has done this for years. But, an even more important point: Google’s GrandCentral service is already free. For anyone. Whether you have a home or not. So, offering it for free to the homeless isn’t anything special. In fact, it would really only seem newsworthy if, for some reason, the company were not offering accounts to the homeless. So, yes, basically, this is a story about how Google is offering its already free service to the homeless, even though the homeless have already had free voicemail offerings for years. Next thing you know, we’re going to see a press release about how the homeless can now use search engines for free too… Plus, I hear that the homeless can get free Gmail accounts!