nosql – Techdirt (original) (raw)
DailyDirt: Will This Problem Ever Go Away?
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
A common complaint for closed source software-as-a-service is that it can just go away almost any minute — leaving users abandoned without any immediate backup solutions. There might be alternatives to switch to, but the alternatives are not exactly the same, and this is why people complained so much when [GeoCities, Google Reader, FormsCentral, etc.] shut down. Users get accustomed to certain features that may be unique. Some companies are better at handling service shutdowns than others, but in the end, it’s still really annoying.
- Apple acquired FoundationDB, and the support of its distributed database software will abruptly end. Users can still continue to use the software they’ve downloaded already, but there won’t be much help if there’s a problem. [url]
- Xeround suddenly shut down its database as a service business in 2013, giving paying customers just 2 weeks notice to migrate their data. At least Xeround’s service was based on scaling MySQL, but no one likes to have to move large scale databases in just a couple of weeks. [url]
- A really easy-to-use database service called Dabble DB shut down after the team behind it was hired by Twitter. They gave users 60 days notice before shutting down, but nothing exactly like it seems to exist anymore. [url]
After you’ve finished checking out those links, if you have some spare change (or more) and would like to support Techdirt, take a look at our Daily Deals for cool gadgets and other awesome stuff.
Filed Under: database software, mysql, nosql, open source, saas, software
Companies: apple, dabbledb, foundationdb, twitter, xeround
Senate Not Concerned About How Often NSA Spies On Americans, But Very Concerned That It Built Open Source Software To Do So
from the priorities,-people dept
Wired has a troubling story of how the Senate Armed Services Committee is pushing a bill that would likely kill off an open source NoSQL project that came out of the NSA called Accumulo. Like many other such NoSQL efforts, the NSA basically took some Google white papers about its BigTable distributed database setup, and built its own open source version, with a few improvements… and then open sourced the whole thing and put it under the Apache Foundation. It’s kind of rare to see such a secretive agency like the NSA open source anything, but it does seem like the kind of thing that ought to be encouraged.
Unfortunately, the Senate Armed Services Committee sees things very differently. As part of a 600-page bill that’s being floated, it actually calls out Accumulo by name, and suggests that it violates a policy that says the government shouldn’t build its own software when there are other competing commercial offerings on the market. The reasoning is basically that the government shouldn’t spend resources reinventing the wheel if it can spend fewer resources using existing code. You can see the basic reasoning behind that, but applying it here makes little sense. As the article notes, here we’re talking about software that’s already been developed and released — not a new effort to rebuild existing software. In fact, those who follow this stuff closely note that Accumulo did “break new ground” with some of its features when it was being built. To then kill it afterwards seems not just counterproductive, but could also create a chilling effect for government open source efforts, which seem like something we should be encouraging, not killing.
What’s really odd is the close interest that the Senate seems to be paying to this. The discussion is very specific, naming Accumulo and some of the competing offerings on the market. They’re specifically calling out this one product. Of course, as Julian Sanchez notes, there’s a bit of irony in the fact that the very same Senate appears to have absolutely no interest in finding out how often the NSA spies on Americans… but sure is concerned about what database it uses to store all of the information it’s getting.
Of course… all of this raises a separate issue in my mind: can the NSA even open source Accumulo? I though that creations of the federal government were automatically public domain, rather than under copyright. And, thus, putting it under a specific license might, in fact, present limitations that the government can’t actually impose on the software…. Thus, shouldn’t the software code actually be completely open as a public domain project? The government should be able set up an Apache-like setup, but one without any restrictions on the code.
Filed Under: accumulo, bigtable, databases, nosql, nsa, open source, senate, spying