Yulia Antonyan | Yerevan State University (original) (raw)
Papers by Yulia Antonyan
Armenia after 2018, 2024
The goal of the volume is to launch a discussion about Armenia and its various challenging realit... more The goal of the volume is to launch a discussion about Armenia and its various challenging realities today. The book addresses Armenia's social, cultural and political environment after the shocks that the country witnessed in the period of three years from 2018 to 2020. The collection of articles is multidisciplinary, it embraces specialists in political science, anthropology, sociology, and philosophy.
The volume is addressing the concept of the Soviet-Armenian Culture (Khorhrdahay mshakuyt), its c... more The volume is addressing the concept of the Soviet-Armenian Culture (Khorhrdahay mshakuyt), its construction, imagination, meanings and manifestations. The articles discuss the ideas, attitudes and practices associated with patterns of culture called and considered “Soviet”. The volume is in Armenian, but contains detailed English-language abstracts at the end.
Ժողովածուն նպատակ ունի գիտական շրջանառության մեջ դնելու հումանիտար ու սոցիալական մի շարք գիտակարգերի կողմից Հայաստանի պատմության ու մշակույթի խորհրդային շրջանի վերաբերյալ ակնհայտորեն թերուսումնասիրված նոր նյութեր, նոր վերլուծություններ ու նոր հարցադրումներ: Հոդվածները ընդգրկում են խորհրդահայ մշակույթի հայեցակարգում տեղավորվող բազմաբնույթ երևույթները․ խորհրդային մշակութային քաղաքականությունը, խորհրդային քաղաքացիների բողոքային մշակույթը և ինքնությունները, մտավորականության և արվեստի խորհրդային ընկալումներն ու զարգացումները, աթեիզմի ժամանակաշրջանում կրոնի փոխակերպումները, ինչպես նաև խորհրդային արդյունաբերական մշակույթի մնացորդների ուսումնասիրությունը։ Ժողովածուն հասցեագրաված է մշակութային մարդաբանների, սոցիոլոգների, պատմաբանների, արվեստագետների ու գրականագետների և հումանիտար այլ գիտակարգերի մասնագետների լայն շրջանակին:
Tobias Koellner (ed.), Family Firms and Business Families in Cross-Cultural Perspective Bringing Anthropology Back In, 2023
This article is about the practices of family business in the Armenian politico-economic system i... more This article is about the practices of family business in the Armenian politico-economic system in the period of 1991-2018, from gaining independence until the Velvet Revolution of 2018. Family business structures had been one of the main pillars of the parallel ‘oligarchic’ economy, monopolized by oligarchs to illegally leach off the state budget and infrastructures since Armenia ushered in the post-socialist capitalism era. Why did this system exist? In order to tackle that question I will emphasize cultural specifics, functions and roles of family, kinship and relatedness networks in Soviet and post-Soviet Armenia. Although the principles of strong paternalism, solidarity, reciprocity and loyalty may be widespread in kinship structures in general, they are particularly salient in the economic and political sphere in Armenia. In Armenia, family and kinship networks were important factors of survival/prosperity under socialist economic conditions and they appeared to function quite well in the informal systems that remained closed and impermeable for outsiders and the law. The author will try to demonstrate how some extended families gradually turned into political and business ‘organizations’ and how traditional perceptions and practices of reciprocity, matrimonial ties and cooperation between the families could help them resolve serious inner disputes, as well as business and political conflicts that emerged periodically. At the same time, the article is an attempt to investigate some cultural and gender-specific practices and values that were underpinning the functionalism of illegal or semi-legal structures of big family economy and politics. Matrimonial alliances, blood kinship, affinal kinship and agnatic networks were fully involved in the process of building a specific social and economic environment that would be reciprocally supported by political forces in power. The basis of reciprocity was the exchange of business privileges and legal coverage ensured by the government for political support and a guaranteed number of votes (both real and falsified) during local and national elections, which were usually provided through the same family and kinship networks. Although the whole system of oligarchic economy and falsified democracy had been perceived negatively by the population in general, traditional big family values such as loyalty, reciprocity and paternalism were effectively working for it in many individual cases.
In this article, the author tries to trace the trajectories of Soviet and post-Soviet transformat... more In this article, the author tries to trace the trajectories of Soviet and post-Soviet transformations of vernacular religiosity in Armenia, in particular, the cult of shrines. She argues that the cult of shrines and related manifestations of vernacular religion were consistently reconceptualized, first, in the period of Soviet secularization and modernization, and, secondly, in the period of post-Soviet and post-secular transformations of the Armenian society. The Soviet modernity led to 'neo-archaization' of vernacular religious practice by instrumentalizing some pre-institutional forms and manifestations of religiosity. The post-secular reconceptualization of vernacular religion draws upon new realities, such as mobile/virtual religiosity, new religious materiality, commodification and consumerism, and a new, modernized interplay between institutional and non-institutional dimensions of religion(s).
The article analyzes the process of post-Soviet invention of a new religious tradition of icon pa... more The article analyzes the process of post-Soviet invention of a new religious tradition of icon painting in the Armenian Apostolic Church. During the Middle Ages, the Armenian Christianity did not produce a tradition of icon-worshipping. However, since the 17 th century, due to various reasons, church painting was developed and became a part of both church interior and everyday religiosity. During the Church's post-Soviet re-institutionalization, such painting became more and more demanded as its purchase and gifting was a significant part of the church economy and of prestigious gift exchange. As a result, along with the wide-known older "Armenian" style, a new "icon painting canon" emerged. It was "reconstructed", but in fact invented, as an allegedly authentic Armenian style, on the basis of Byzantine icons and the medieval Armenian book miniature, by two icon-painters, father and son Azaryans. Azaryans claimed primacy of the Armenian icon-painting by referring to the evangelical myth of the miraculous image of Christ, allegedly belonging to the Armenian king Abgar. Although the Azaryans' project remains marginal and feminized, it may be seen as a manifestation of post-secular religiosity, a form of religious practice and even an act of religious conversion.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02634937.2020.1723490?scroll=top&needAccess=true, 2020
Along with other globalizing forces such as migration and proselytism, religious markets have pla... more Along with other globalizing forces such as migration and proselytism, religious markets have played a key role in the transformation of religious practices in Armenia. This article focuses on the intersection of mobility and markets through mobile fairs, which are temporarily organized at shrines on pilgrimage days. Market vendors tend to travel from shrine to shrine across Armenia throughout the year, each following his or her own trajectory. In this article I examine how such markets are organized, how and by whom they are run and controlled, how small-scale mono-confessional markets become part of transnational globalization processes, and how the marketplace is embedded in the pilgrimage ritual, changing and modernizing its traditional meanings and structure.
A b s t r a c t: This discussion concerns certain important issues in the anthropology of religio... more A b s t r a c t: This discussion concerns certain important issues in the anthropology of religion. In recent decades, there have been claims in the social sciences that 'religion' has outlived its usefulness as a concept, with criticism coming from a range of disciplines. Thus it is reasonable to ask how signifi cant and intellectually credible the term 'religion' may be, and how useful to our research and writing. Other questions that may be encountered when studying religion(s) are related to the confessional or non-confessional identities of researchers. In the anthropology of religion, there is particularly extensive attention paid to the personal standpoint of individual scholars and specifi cally to the extent of their involvement with a given religious tradition. On the other hand, among the specifi cities of religious fi eldwork is the high degree of 'agency' of our informants, as expressed especially in the efforts made in a particular religious group to convert the observer to their own beliefs. The participants of the discussion accept the challenges of these diffi cult problems, and strive to analyze the processes of anthropological and sociological description and interpretation of religion(s).
"Construction of religion in the Armenian neo-paganism". The article is addressing the process of... more "Construction of religion in the Armenian neo-paganism". The article is addressing the process of the invention of a religion by the Armenian neo-pagans. It reveals the main stages of the process and the attempts to find out its social and cultural background. The article is in Russian, published in a volume entitled "Izobretenie religii. desekulyarizatsiya v post-sovetskom kontexte" (Invention of religion. Desecularization in a post-soviet context"), SAint-Petersbourg, European University in SpB, 2015.
Elites and “Elites”: Transformations of Social Structures in Post-Soviet Armenia and Georgia. Th... more Elites and “Elites”:
Transformations of Social Structures in Post-Soviet Armenia and Georgia.
This volume is the result of a joint, Armenian-Georgian anthropological survey of the concept of “elites” in contemporary Georgia and Armenia. The survey has embraced a set of topics related to the process of the formation of new national elites in the course of the construction of the nation-states, genealogy and typology of new elites, mechanisms and principles of organization of power, old and new hierarchical structures, and their continuity with the cultural heritage of previous periods of history. Being both very much alike and very much distinctive from each other, Armenia and Georgia have developed social structures similar by form, yet discrepant through their inner interplay of meanings, interpretations and correlations of the parts of these structures. This study of elites, elitism and the elitist involves different social (and also ethnic and religious) groups, which have been affected by the process of reconfiguration of social structures.
Despite growing academic interest in the new “native faiths” that have emerged in post-Socialist ... more Despite growing academic interest in the new “native faiths” that have emerged in post-Socialist space, Armenian Neopaganism has remained a largely unknown phenomenon.1 There is no single English-language analysis that covers this subject extensively, and the short hints on this matter cannot present its multi-dimensional character.2 This chapter will describe the his-tory and structure of the main Neopagan organization in Armenia—the Arordineri Ukht—and explore its interrelations with the dominant religious tradition in Armenia (Christianity, represented by the Armenian Apostolic Church), as well as analyze its nationalistic-dissident foundations and ties with nationalistic political and social movements. Finally, we will have a closer look at the Arordiner’s holy scripture—the Ukhtagirk—as well as on the most important elements of the worldview and ritual system of these Neopagans.
The Social Semiotics of the " Migrant " Churches in Armenia Yulia Antonyan — Yerevan State Univer... more The Social Semiotics of the " Migrant " Churches in Armenia Yulia Antonyan — Yerevan State University (Armenia). yuliaantonyan@ysu.am Based on a field study of the Gegharkunik region of Armenia, the research addresses the process of construction of new churches in the context of contemporary social and economic life of the Armenian village. Main characters of the research are founders and sponsors of newly constructed churches, which are represented by several social types and, in particular, by the type of an affluent (nearly always male) migrant, who thus wants to be represented at his home village with a new status. Building a church usually becomes a social project, through which migrants construct the positive image of themselves, strengthen the personal and family influence among local authorities and business people, thus joining to the local elites, even in case they are almost always physically outside of their home town. Each new church gets a " legend ", which makes clear the motives of a donator with reference to such values as piety, mystical connection to the saints, deference to the memory of ancestors, and compassion to people's needs. Due to the localized functions and the individual character of construction, newly‑constructed churches in some cases take over the functions of family shrines and are attended mostly by members of the family of a sponsor and its neighbors.
The paper discusses a phenomenon of constructing a cult of the contemporary Hero and a related my... more The paper discusses a phenomenon of constructing a cult of the contemporary Hero and a related mythology in the context of the Armenian neo-paganism movement. It is about the myths of Garegin Nzhdeh (1886-1955), a famous Armenian politician and military commander of the first half of 20th century. The mythological cycle makes a part of the neo-pagans' sacred book so called "Ukhtagirk" (the Book of Vows), authored by the founder of the neo-pagan movement in Armenia, Slak Kakosyan. The book also includes some added and re-interpreted excerpts of the Nzhdeh’s ideology of the Armenian Nationalism called "Tseghakron", literally the "Cult of Nation". The paper argues possible sources, reasons of emergence and current development trends of the Nzhdeh's cult and mythology. The Nzhdeh’s cult and mythology are viewed in the context of cults of politicians and leaders of 20th century. The author employs a concept of neo-mythology to designate those myths that are being created as religious ones, but are secondary in relation to existing motives and forms.
The Nagorno-Karabakh war has changed people's lives and destinies. 1 It affected their cultural m... more The Nagorno-Karabakh war has changed people's lives and destinies. 1 It affected their cultural models, starting from their world-view and mentality and ending with their everyday life and practices. It also brought about new cultural phenomena that became a part of people's vital space, new mentalities and new identities.
Abstract: This article is about realities embedded in the notions of “religiosity” and “Armenian ... more Abstract: This article is about realities embedded in the notions of “religiosity” and “Armenian religious
identity” in contemporary Armenia. It is focused on some patterns of the Armenian national religion and offi
cial forms of Armenian Apostolic Christianity. In particular, the article discusses links, attitudes, interrelations,
contradictions and mutual infl uences of doctrinal Armenian Apostolic Christianity and its vernacular versions.
The Armenian version of vernacular Christianity includes the religious practices of worshipping local saints,
magic, healing and divination. An attempt to outline three conventional models of religiosity within the Armenian
Apostolic Christian identity, those of “grassroots”, “privatized”, and “fundamental”, has been made in the paper,
and the main patterns of attitudes among these models are discussed. In fact, these models of religiosity represent
different religious subcultures, with different systems of signs and different patterns of religious mentality, though
sharing the symbols, values, and priorities of Armenian Apostolic Christian identity at the national level.
Armenia after 2018, 2024
The goal of the volume is to launch a discussion about Armenia and its various challenging realit... more The goal of the volume is to launch a discussion about Armenia and its various challenging realities today. The book addresses Armenia's social, cultural and political environment after the shocks that the country witnessed in the period of three years from 2018 to 2020. The collection of articles is multidisciplinary, it embraces specialists in political science, anthropology, sociology, and philosophy.
The volume is addressing the concept of the Soviet-Armenian Culture (Khorhrdahay mshakuyt), its c... more The volume is addressing the concept of the Soviet-Armenian Culture (Khorhrdahay mshakuyt), its construction, imagination, meanings and manifestations. The articles discuss the ideas, attitudes and practices associated with patterns of culture called and considered “Soviet”. The volume is in Armenian, but contains detailed English-language abstracts at the end.
Ժողովածուն նպատակ ունի գիտական շրջանառության մեջ դնելու հումանիտար ու սոցիալական մի շարք գիտակարգերի կողմից Հայաստանի պատմության ու մշակույթի խորհրդային շրջանի վերաբերյալ ակնհայտորեն թերուսումնասիրված նոր նյութեր, նոր վերլուծություններ ու նոր հարցադրումներ: Հոդվածները ընդգրկում են խորհրդահայ մշակույթի հայեցակարգում տեղավորվող բազմաբնույթ երևույթները․ խորհրդային մշակութային քաղաքականությունը, խորհրդային քաղաքացիների բողոքային մշակույթը և ինքնությունները, մտավորականության և արվեստի խորհրդային ընկալումներն ու զարգացումները, աթեիզմի ժամանակաշրջանում կրոնի փոխակերպումները, ինչպես նաև խորհրդային արդյունաբերական մշակույթի մնացորդների ուսումնասիրությունը։ Ժողովածուն հասցեագրաված է մշակութային մարդաբանների, սոցիոլոգների, պատմաբանների, արվեստագետների ու գրականագետների և հումանիտար այլ գիտակարգերի մասնագետների լայն շրջանակին:
Tobias Koellner (ed.), Family Firms and Business Families in Cross-Cultural Perspective Bringing Anthropology Back In, 2023
This article is about the practices of family business in the Armenian politico-economic system i... more This article is about the practices of family business in the Armenian politico-economic system in the period of 1991-2018, from gaining independence until the Velvet Revolution of 2018. Family business structures had been one of the main pillars of the parallel ‘oligarchic’ economy, monopolized by oligarchs to illegally leach off the state budget and infrastructures since Armenia ushered in the post-socialist capitalism era. Why did this system exist? In order to tackle that question I will emphasize cultural specifics, functions and roles of family, kinship and relatedness networks in Soviet and post-Soviet Armenia. Although the principles of strong paternalism, solidarity, reciprocity and loyalty may be widespread in kinship structures in general, they are particularly salient in the economic and political sphere in Armenia. In Armenia, family and kinship networks were important factors of survival/prosperity under socialist economic conditions and they appeared to function quite well in the informal systems that remained closed and impermeable for outsiders and the law. The author will try to demonstrate how some extended families gradually turned into political and business ‘organizations’ and how traditional perceptions and practices of reciprocity, matrimonial ties and cooperation between the families could help them resolve serious inner disputes, as well as business and political conflicts that emerged periodically. At the same time, the article is an attempt to investigate some cultural and gender-specific practices and values that were underpinning the functionalism of illegal or semi-legal structures of big family economy and politics. Matrimonial alliances, blood kinship, affinal kinship and agnatic networks were fully involved in the process of building a specific social and economic environment that would be reciprocally supported by political forces in power. The basis of reciprocity was the exchange of business privileges and legal coverage ensured by the government for political support and a guaranteed number of votes (both real and falsified) during local and national elections, which were usually provided through the same family and kinship networks. Although the whole system of oligarchic economy and falsified democracy had been perceived negatively by the population in general, traditional big family values such as loyalty, reciprocity and paternalism were effectively working for it in many individual cases.
In this article, the author tries to trace the trajectories of Soviet and post-Soviet transformat... more In this article, the author tries to trace the trajectories of Soviet and post-Soviet transformations of vernacular religiosity in Armenia, in particular, the cult of shrines. She argues that the cult of shrines and related manifestations of vernacular religion were consistently reconceptualized, first, in the period of Soviet secularization and modernization, and, secondly, in the period of post-Soviet and post-secular transformations of the Armenian society. The Soviet modernity led to 'neo-archaization' of vernacular religious practice by instrumentalizing some pre-institutional forms and manifestations of religiosity. The post-secular reconceptualization of vernacular religion draws upon new realities, such as mobile/virtual religiosity, new religious materiality, commodification and consumerism, and a new, modernized interplay between institutional and non-institutional dimensions of religion(s).
The article analyzes the process of post-Soviet invention of a new religious tradition of icon pa... more The article analyzes the process of post-Soviet invention of a new religious tradition of icon painting in the Armenian Apostolic Church. During the Middle Ages, the Armenian Christianity did not produce a tradition of icon-worshipping. However, since the 17 th century, due to various reasons, church painting was developed and became a part of both church interior and everyday religiosity. During the Church's post-Soviet re-institutionalization, such painting became more and more demanded as its purchase and gifting was a significant part of the church economy and of prestigious gift exchange. As a result, along with the wide-known older "Armenian" style, a new "icon painting canon" emerged. It was "reconstructed", but in fact invented, as an allegedly authentic Armenian style, on the basis of Byzantine icons and the medieval Armenian book miniature, by two icon-painters, father and son Azaryans. Azaryans claimed primacy of the Armenian icon-painting by referring to the evangelical myth of the miraculous image of Christ, allegedly belonging to the Armenian king Abgar. Although the Azaryans' project remains marginal and feminized, it may be seen as a manifestation of post-secular religiosity, a form of religious practice and even an act of religious conversion.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02634937.2020.1723490?scroll=top&needAccess=true, 2020
Along with other globalizing forces such as migration and proselytism, religious markets have pla... more Along with other globalizing forces such as migration and proselytism, religious markets have played a key role in the transformation of religious practices in Armenia. This article focuses on the intersection of mobility and markets through mobile fairs, which are temporarily organized at shrines on pilgrimage days. Market vendors tend to travel from shrine to shrine across Armenia throughout the year, each following his or her own trajectory. In this article I examine how such markets are organized, how and by whom they are run and controlled, how small-scale mono-confessional markets become part of transnational globalization processes, and how the marketplace is embedded in the pilgrimage ritual, changing and modernizing its traditional meanings and structure.
A b s t r a c t: This discussion concerns certain important issues in the anthropology of religio... more A b s t r a c t: This discussion concerns certain important issues in the anthropology of religion. In recent decades, there have been claims in the social sciences that 'religion' has outlived its usefulness as a concept, with criticism coming from a range of disciplines. Thus it is reasonable to ask how signifi cant and intellectually credible the term 'religion' may be, and how useful to our research and writing. Other questions that may be encountered when studying religion(s) are related to the confessional or non-confessional identities of researchers. In the anthropology of religion, there is particularly extensive attention paid to the personal standpoint of individual scholars and specifi cally to the extent of their involvement with a given religious tradition. On the other hand, among the specifi cities of religious fi eldwork is the high degree of 'agency' of our informants, as expressed especially in the efforts made in a particular religious group to convert the observer to their own beliefs. The participants of the discussion accept the challenges of these diffi cult problems, and strive to analyze the processes of anthropological and sociological description and interpretation of religion(s).
"Construction of religion in the Armenian neo-paganism". The article is addressing the process of... more "Construction of religion in the Armenian neo-paganism". The article is addressing the process of the invention of a religion by the Armenian neo-pagans. It reveals the main stages of the process and the attempts to find out its social and cultural background. The article is in Russian, published in a volume entitled "Izobretenie religii. desekulyarizatsiya v post-sovetskom kontexte" (Invention of religion. Desecularization in a post-soviet context"), SAint-Petersbourg, European University in SpB, 2015.
Elites and “Elites”: Transformations of Social Structures in Post-Soviet Armenia and Georgia. Th... more Elites and “Elites”:
Transformations of Social Structures in Post-Soviet Armenia and Georgia.
This volume is the result of a joint, Armenian-Georgian anthropological survey of the concept of “elites” in contemporary Georgia and Armenia. The survey has embraced a set of topics related to the process of the formation of new national elites in the course of the construction of the nation-states, genealogy and typology of new elites, mechanisms and principles of organization of power, old and new hierarchical structures, and their continuity with the cultural heritage of previous periods of history. Being both very much alike and very much distinctive from each other, Armenia and Georgia have developed social structures similar by form, yet discrepant through their inner interplay of meanings, interpretations and correlations of the parts of these structures. This study of elites, elitism and the elitist involves different social (and also ethnic and religious) groups, which have been affected by the process of reconfiguration of social structures.
Despite growing academic interest in the new “native faiths” that have emerged in post-Socialist ... more Despite growing academic interest in the new “native faiths” that have emerged in post-Socialist space, Armenian Neopaganism has remained a largely unknown phenomenon.1 There is no single English-language analysis that covers this subject extensively, and the short hints on this matter cannot present its multi-dimensional character.2 This chapter will describe the his-tory and structure of the main Neopagan organization in Armenia—the Arordineri Ukht—and explore its interrelations with the dominant religious tradition in Armenia (Christianity, represented by the Armenian Apostolic Church), as well as analyze its nationalistic-dissident foundations and ties with nationalistic political and social movements. Finally, we will have a closer look at the Arordiner’s holy scripture—the Ukhtagirk—as well as on the most important elements of the worldview and ritual system of these Neopagans.
The Social Semiotics of the " Migrant " Churches in Armenia Yulia Antonyan — Yerevan State Univer... more The Social Semiotics of the " Migrant " Churches in Armenia Yulia Antonyan — Yerevan State University (Armenia). yuliaantonyan@ysu.am Based on a field study of the Gegharkunik region of Armenia, the research addresses the process of construction of new churches in the context of contemporary social and economic life of the Armenian village. Main characters of the research are founders and sponsors of newly constructed churches, which are represented by several social types and, in particular, by the type of an affluent (nearly always male) migrant, who thus wants to be represented at his home village with a new status. Building a church usually becomes a social project, through which migrants construct the positive image of themselves, strengthen the personal and family influence among local authorities and business people, thus joining to the local elites, even in case they are almost always physically outside of their home town. Each new church gets a " legend ", which makes clear the motives of a donator with reference to such values as piety, mystical connection to the saints, deference to the memory of ancestors, and compassion to people's needs. Due to the localized functions and the individual character of construction, newly‑constructed churches in some cases take over the functions of family shrines and are attended mostly by members of the family of a sponsor and its neighbors.
The paper discusses a phenomenon of constructing a cult of the contemporary Hero and a related my... more The paper discusses a phenomenon of constructing a cult of the contemporary Hero and a related mythology in the context of the Armenian neo-paganism movement. It is about the myths of Garegin Nzhdeh (1886-1955), a famous Armenian politician and military commander of the first half of 20th century. The mythological cycle makes a part of the neo-pagans' sacred book so called "Ukhtagirk" (the Book of Vows), authored by the founder of the neo-pagan movement in Armenia, Slak Kakosyan. The book also includes some added and re-interpreted excerpts of the Nzhdeh’s ideology of the Armenian Nationalism called "Tseghakron", literally the "Cult of Nation". The paper argues possible sources, reasons of emergence and current development trends of the Nzhdeh's cult and mythology. The Nzhdeh’s cult and mythology are viewed in the context of cults of politicians and leaders of 20th century. The author employs a concept of neo-mythology to designate those myths that are being created as religious ones, but are secondary in relation to existing motives and forms.
The Nagorno-Karabakh war has changed people's lives and destinies. 1 It affected their cultural m... more The Nagorno-Karabakh war has changed people's lives and destinies. 1 It affected their cultural models, starting from their world-view and mentality and ending with their everyday life and practices. It also brought about new cultural phenomena that became a part of people's vital space, new mentalities and new identities.
Abstract: This article is about realities embedded in the notions of “religiosity” and “Armenian ... more Abstract: This article is about realities embedded in the notions of “religiosity” and “Armenian religious
identity” in contemporary Armenia. It is focused on some patterns of the Armenian national religion and offi
cial forms of Armenian Apostolic Christianity. In particular, the article discusses links, attitudes, interrelations,
contradictions and mutual infl uences of doctrinal Armenian Apostolic Christianity and its vernacular versions.
The Armenian version of vernacular Christianity includes the religious practices of worshipping local saints,
magic, healing and divination. An attempt to outline three conventional models of religiosity within the Armenian
Apostolic Christian identity, those of “grassroots”, “privatized”, and “fundamental”, has been made in the paper,
and the main patterns of attitudes among these models are discussed. In fact, these models of religiosity represent
different religious subcultures, with different systems of signs and different patterns of religious mentality, though
sharing the symbols, values, and priorities of Armenian Apostolic Christian identity at the national level.