Message 149660 - Python tracker (original) (raw)

To factorize the code and to fix encoding issues in the time module, I added functions to decode/encode from/to the locale encoding: PyUnicode_DecodeLocale(), PyUnicode_DecodeLocaleAndSize() and PyUnicode_EncodeLocale() (issue #13560). During tests, I realized that os.strerror() should also use the current locale encoding.

Do you think that the codec should be exposed in Python?

--

The C functions are used by:

The codec can be useful for developers interacting with C functions depending on the locale. Examples: strerror(), strftime(), ... Use the filesystem encoding would be wrong for such function because the locale encoding can be changed by setlocale() with LC_CTYPE or LC_ALL. Use the filesystem encoding would lead to mojibake.

Even if the most common usecases of C functions depending on the locale are already covered by the Python standard library, developers may want to bind new functions using ctypes (or something else), and I believe that the locale encoding would be useful for these bindings.

--

The problem with a new codec is that it becomes more difficult to choose the right encoding:

I suppose that this issue can be solve by writing documentation explaining the usage of each codec.

--

Attached patch adds the new locale codec.

The major limitation of the current implementation is that the codec only supports the strict and the surrogateescape error handlers. I don't plan to implement other error handlers because I don't think that they would be useful, but it would be possible to implement them.

--

I would be "nice" to fix os.strerror() and time.strftime() in Python 3.2, but I don't want to fix them because it would require to add the locale codec and I don't want to do such change in a stable version. The issue only concerns few people changing their locale encoding at runtime. I hope that everybody uses UTF-8 and never change their locale encoding to something else ;-)