Message 150756 - Python tracker (original) (raw)
Message150756
Author | lemburg |
---|---|
Recipients | Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, jcea, lemburg, pitrou, terry.reedy, v+python, vstinner |
Date | 2012-01-06.17:59:39 |
SpamBayes Score | 0.0005037032 |
Marked as misclassified | No |
Message-id | 4F073682.6050005@egenix.com |
In-reply-to | 4F072943.8090603@egenix.com |
Content |
---|
Here's an example of hash-attack.patch finding an on-purpose programming error (hashing all objects to the same value): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4865325/counting-collisions-in-a-python-dictionary (see the second example on the page for @Winston Ewert's solution) With the patch you get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "testcollisons.py", line 20, in d[o] = 1 KeyError: 'too many hash collisions' |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2012-01-06 17:59:40 | lemburg | set | recipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Arfrever, v+python, alex, dmalcolm, Mark.Shannon, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, PaulMcMillan |
2012-01-06 17:59:39 | lemburg | link | issue13703 messages |
2012-01-06 17:59:39 | lemburg | create |