Message 256211 - Python tracker (original) (raw)

Good point, it is doing (int-complex), observe also the following pecularities:

-0 - 0j 0j -0. - 0j (-0+0j) -0j -0j 0-0j 0j -(0j) (-0-0j) 0.+(-0j) 0j

Does this mean the bug is in repr() ? As I understand the output of repr() is supposed to be something that can evaluated to recreate the same object. However I am unsure whether it would be nicer if repr() were to yield 'complex(-0.,-0.)' or '-(-0.+0j)'.