Message 318213 - Python tracker (original) (raw)

I did look at the code :-)

I also looked at the code. I had to do so to understand why the example output was not "as expected." ;)

I don't agree about the example in the documentation, it is a clear demonstration about how to use the API in general and AFAIK is not intended to show how priorities work.

Although I came to the same conclusion as you regarding both the fact and the reason the output was correct, I respectfully disagree that the example is clear. It is not. Yes, the example, as written, is intended to demonstrate the API -- which consists of several functionalities including priority. If this were not so, the example would not be passing different priority values with the same delay value.

I suggest re-opening this issue as a documentation bug and modifying the example to use enterabs instead of enter.

Respectfully, M Fisher