Message 96650 - Python tracker (original) (raw)
Message96650
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asnakelover, brian.curtin, jackdied, nirai, pitrou |
| Date | 2009-12-19.21:19:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0006316708 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1261257631.3339.4.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to | 1261251094.35.0.443976640676.issue7471@psf.upfronthosting.co.za |
| Content |
|---|
| > isatty() and __iter__() of io.BufferedIOBase raise on closed file and > __enter__() raises ValueError with different (generic) message. > > Should we keep the original GzipFile methods or prefer the implementation > of io.BufferedIOBase? It's fine to use the BufferedIOBase implementation. There's no reason to call isatty() on or iterate over a closed file. |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-12-19 21:19:49 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, jackdied, nirai, brian.curtin, asnakelover |
| 2009-12-19 21:19:48 | pitrou | link | issue7471 messages |
| 2009-12-19 21:19:48 | pitrou | create |