Ord in core::cmp - Rust (original) (raw)

pub trait Ord: Eq + PartialOrd<Self> {
    // Required method
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering;

    // Provided methods
    fn max(self, other: Self) -> Self
       where Self: Sized { ... }
    fn min(self, other: Self) -> Self
       where Self: Sized { ... }
    fn clamp(self, min: Self, max: Self) -> Self
       where Self: Sized { ... }
}

Expand description

Trait for types that form a total order.

Implementations must be consistent with the PartialOrd implementation, and ensure max,min, and clamp are consistent with cmp:

Violating these requirements is a logic error. The behavior resulting from a logic error is not specified, but users of the trait must ensure that such logic errors do not result in undefined behavior. This means that unsafe code must not rely on the correctness of these methods.

§Corollaries

From the above and the requirements of PartialOrd, it follows that for all a, b and c:

Mathematically speaking, the < operator defines a strict weak order. In cases where ==conforms to mathematical equality, it also defines a strict total order.

§Derivable

This trait can be used with #[derive].

When derived on structs, it will produce alexicographic ordering based on the top-to-bottom declaration order of the struct’s members.

When derived on enums, variants are ordered primarily by their discriminants. Secondarily, they are ordered by their fields. By default, the discriminant is smallest for variants at the top, and largest for variants at the bottom. Here’s an example:

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
enum E {
    Top,
    Bottom,
}

assert!(E::Top < E::Bottom);

However, manually setting the discriminants can override this default behavior:

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
enum E {
    Top = 2,
    Bottom = 1,
}

assert!(E::Bottom < E::Top);

§Lexicographical comparison

Lexicographical comparison is an operation with the following properties:

§How can I implement Ord?

Ord requires that the type also be PartialOrd, PartialEq, and Eq.

Because Ord implies a stronger ordering relationship than PartialOrd, and both Ord andPartialOrd must agree, you must choose how to implement Ord first. You can choose to derive it, or implement it manually. If you derive it, you should derive all four traits. If you implement it manually, you should manually implement all four traits, based on the implementation of Ord.

Here’s an example where you want to define the Character comparison by health andexperience only, disregarding the field mana:

use std::cmp::Ordering;

struct Character {
    health: u32,
    experience: u32,
    mana: f32,
}

impl Ord for Character {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering {
        self.experience
            .cmp(&other.experience)
            .then(self.health.cmp(&other.health))
    }
}

impl PartialOrd for Character {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> {
        Some(self.cmp(other))
    }
}

impl PartialEq for Character {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
        self.health == other.health && self.experience == other.experience
    }
}

impl Eq for Character {}

If all you need is to slice::sort a type by a field value, it can be simpler to useslice::sort_by_key.

§Examples of incorrect Ord implementations

use std::cmp::Ordering;

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Character {
    health: f32,
}

impl Ord for Character {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
        if self.health < other.health {
            Ordering::Less
        } else if self.health > other.health {
            Ordering::Greater
        } else {
            Ordering::Equal
        }
    }
}

impl PartialOrd for Character {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> {
        Some(self.cmp(other))
    }
}

impl PartialEq for Character {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
        self.health == other.health
    }
}

impl Eq for Character {}

let a = Character { health: 4.5 };
let b = Character { health: f32::NAN };

// Mistake: floating-point values do not form a total order and using the built-in comparison
// operands to implement `Ord` irregardless of that reality does not change it. Use
// `f32::total_cmp` if you need a total order for floating-point values.

// Reflexivity requirement of `Ord` is not given.
assert!(a == a);
assert!(b != b);

// Antisymmetry requirement of `Ord` is not given. Only one of a < c and c < a is allowed to be
// true, not both or neither.
assert_eq!((a < b) as u8 + (b < a) as u8, 0);
use std::cmp::Ordering;

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Character {
    health: u32,
    experience: u32,
}

impl PartialOrd for Character {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> {
        Some(self.cmp(other))
    }
}

impl Ord for Character {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
        if self.health < 50 {
            self.health.cmp(&other.health)
        } else {
            self.experience.cmp(&other.experience)
        }
    }
}

// For performance reasons implementing `PartialEq` this way is not the idiomatic way, but it
// ensures consistent behavior between `PartialEq`, `PartialOrd` and `Ord` in this example.
impl PartialEq for Character {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
        self.cmp(other) == Ordering::Equal
    }
}

impl Eq for Character {}

let a = Character {
    health: 3,
    experience: 5,
};
let b = Character {
    health: 10,
    experience: 77,
};
let c = Character {
    health: 143,
    experience: 2,
};

// Mistake: The implementation of `Ord` compares different fields depending on the value of
// `self.health`, the resulting order is not total.

// Transitivity requirement of `Ord` is not given. If a is smaller than b and b is smaller than
// c, by transitive property a must also be smaller than c.
assert!(a < b && b < c && c < a);

// Antisymmetry requirement of `Ord` is not given. Only one of a < c and c < a is allowed to be
// true, not both or neither.
assert_eq!((a < c) as u8 + (c < a) as u8, 2);

The documentation of PartialOrd contains further examples, for example it’s wrong forPartialOrd and PartialEq to disagree.

1.0.0 · Source

This method returns an Ordering between self and other.

By convention, self.cmp(&other) returns the ordering matching the expressionself <operator> other if true.

§Examples
use std::cmp::Ordering;

assert_eq!(5.cmp(&10), Ordering::Less);
assert_eq!(10.cmp(&5), Ordering::Greater);
assert_eq!(5.cmp(&5), Ordering::Equal);

1.21.0 · Source

Compares and returns the maximum of two values.

Returns the second argument if the comparison determines them to be equal.

§Examples
assert_eq!(1.max(2), 2);
assert_eq!(2.max(2), 2);
use std::cmp::Ordering;

#[derive(Eq)]
struct Equal(&'static str);

impl PartialEq for Equal {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool { true }
}
impl PartialOrd for Equal {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> { Some(Ordering::Equal) }
}
impl Ord for Equal {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering { Ordering::Equal }
}

assert_eq!(Equal("self").max(Equal("other")).0, "other");

1.21.0 · Source

Compares and returns the minimum of two values.

Returns the first argument if the comparison determines them to be equal.

§Examples
assert_eq!(1.min(2), 1);
assert_eq!(2.min(2), 2);
use std::cmp::Ordering;

#[derive(Eq)]
struct Equal(&'static str);

impl PartialEq for Equal {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool { true }
}
impl PartialOrd for Equal {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<Ordering> { Some(Ordering::Equal) }
}
impl Ord for Equal {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Ordering { Ordering::Equal }
}

assert_eq!(Equal("self").min(Equal("other")).0, "self");

1.50.0 · Source

Restrict a value to a certain interval.

Returns max if self is greater than max, and min if self is less than min. Otherwise this returns self.

§Panics

Panics if min > max.

§Examples
assert_eq!((-3).clamp(-2, 1), -2);
assert_eq!(0.clamp(-2, 1), 0);
assert_eq!(2.clamp(-2, 1), 1);

This trait is not dyn compatible.

In older versions of Rust, dyn compatibility was called "object safety", so this trait is not object safe.