[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cook: use bitshift instead of pow(f) func (original) (raw)

Benjamin Larsson banan
Fri Feb 10 13:45:36 CET 2006

Hi, Alexander Strasser wrote:

Hi,

basically it is all in the subject. Why? 1 Because it is an integer operation anyway and this way it is easier to recognize it. The produced tables are identical. 2 The powf() function is not that widely supported yet, so when there is no need for it i don't see any reason to harm portability. Patch attached. If this solution is considered flawed or not acceptable for one or the other reason, then at least consider changing powf() to pow(). Alex (beastd) If this also works on BE systems commit it. And while you are at it you can continue to integerize the code :)

MvH Benjamin Larsson

-- "incorrect information" is an oxymoron. Information is, by definition, factual, correct.

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list