Manuel López-Ibáñez - Re: patches pending review November-January (original) (raw)

This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.

Nobody likes my patches? :'-(Older patches first.

This is blocking dfp support for Wconversion. Not essential but I thought people were interested in that.

This is blocking any further Wconversion patches since November 2006.

Waddress-of-register (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01676.html

This patch is in accordance with the discussion about fixing PR7651. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-01/msg00391.html

Wunused-value and Wextra interaction (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00440.html

This patch is in accordance with the discussion about fixing PR7651. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-01/msg00391.html

PR middle-end/18071 -Winline does not respect -fno-default-inline http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01367.html

PR 29521 Confusing warning for return with expression in function returning void http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01533.html

PR 23572 warnings for out of range floating-point constants The patch was rejected, as it is here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01730.html However, the conversation ended abruptly here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01752.html without specifying what the correct fix (if any) would be. If no fix is possible, we should close the PR.

Wcomparison-fixed (try 2) (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01933.html

PR24924 front-end and preprocessor pedantic_errors settings should agree http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02234.html

Thanks in advance,Manuel.