Michael Eager - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59 (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Michael Eager
- To: Alexandre Oliva
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , "Joseph S. Myers" , Daniel Jacobowitz , Paolo Bonzini , gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, newlib at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:20:48 -0800
- Subject: Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
- References: 20070111225346.GA1335@nevyn.them.org <20070207193352.GA13757@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702072344050.7123@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20070208032909.GA8419@nevyn.them.org> <45CADD5E.404@lu.unisi.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702081239290.12368@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <45CB1C16.10407@lu.unisi.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702081251340.12368@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20070208131821.GA2860@nevyn.them.org> <45CB28BB.8050805@lu.unisi.ch> <20070208141800.GA6649@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702081442160.25268@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m37iuslmod.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45CB5453.3080109@eagercon.com> <or64ab9ajc.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com wrote:
I would much prefer explicitly specifying that the build is cross or native. I want to specify --cross or --native (or the equivalent).
But then, what if you specify --build=X --host=Y --native (with X!=Y)?
That's what diagnostics are for.
Per autoconf docs, --host is supposed to mean --cross. --native is the absence of --host. No room for inconsistencies in options.
If it worked correctly, I doubt there would be much discussion. It seems that configure is always trying to guess whether the build is native or host.
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Erik Christiansen
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
- References:
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Paolo Bonzini - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Paolo Bonzini - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Paolo Bonzini - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Ian Lance Taylor - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Michael Eager - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |