Eric Botcazou - Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents) (original) (raw)

This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.

• From: Eric Botcazou
• To: Sandra Loosemore
• Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Brooks Moses , Lee Millward
• Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:02:43 +0100
• Subject: Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
• References: <45CDE071.6000705@codesourcery.com> <200702101625.36894.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <45CF1FD7.3020308@codesourcery.com>

OK, I've testing SPARC. Doing so actually turned up a bug in our builtins.c changes, rather than in anything in config/sparc. :-P (Looking at it in more detail, I found that some bad changes were accidentally introduced in doing the merge from my original version on the LTO branch.)

Thanks. Not sure whether you tested native or cross but, in the former case and for this kind of somewhat mechanical changes, you can limit yourself to a bootstrap/regtest for the C family of compilers.

-- Eric Botcazou

• References:
  • PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
    * From: Sandra Loosemore
  • Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
    * From: Eric Botcazou
  • Re: PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation part 0/9 (table of contents)
    * From: Sandra Loosemore