Steven Bosscher - [PATCH] More REG_EQ* notes related changes (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Steven Bosscher
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: "Sayle, Roger"
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:32:37 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH] More REG_EQ* notes related changes
Hello,
This patch changes find_reg_equal_equiv_note to be consistent with what set_unique_reg_note does for REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV notes: Do not expect to have them on insns with multiple sets.
Bootstrapped&tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu. OK for the trunk?
Gr. Steven
* rtlanal.c (find_reg_equal_equiv_note): Do not find REG_EQ*
notes on an insn with multiple sets, even if single_set returns
non-NULL for that insn.
Index: rtlanal.c
--- rtlanal.c (revision 122166) +++ rtlanal.c (working copy) @@ -1676,11 +1676,18 @@ find_reg_equal_equiv_note (rtx insn)
if (!INSN_P (insn)) return 0; + for (link = REG_NOTES (insn); link; link = XEXP (link, 1)) if (REG_NOTE_KIND (link) == REG_EQUAL || REG_NOTE_KIND (link) == REG_EQUIV) { - if (single_set (insn) == 0) + /* FIXME: We should never have REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV notes on + insns that have multiple sets. Checking single_set to + make sure of this is not the proper check, as explained + in the comment in set_unique_reg_note. + + This should be changed into an assert. */ + if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == PARALLEL && multiple_sets (insn)) return 0; return link; }
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] More REG_EQ* notes related changes
* From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] More REG_EQ* notes related changes
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |