The Gcc September 2020 Archive by date (original) (raw)

September 2020 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Sep 1 02:04:13 GMT 2020
Ending: Wed Sep 30 20:39:08 GMT 2020
Messages: 289

• Built-in Specs ignored... unless -specs=dump is specified Andrew Pinski
• Future debug options: -f* or -g*? David Blaikie
• Clobber REG_CC only for some constraint alternatives? Hans-Peter Nilsson
• Built-in Specs ignored... unless -specs=dump is specified Giacomo Tesio
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Richard Biener
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Marc Glisse
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Feng Xue OS
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Richard Biener
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Richard Biener
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Feng Xue OS
• [RFC] Add new flag to specify output constraint in match.pd Alexander Monakov
• Question about exporting omputing alias sets Erick Ochoa
• Question about exporting omputing alias sets Richard Biener
• Future debug options: -f* or -g*? Mark Wielaard
• Avoiding truncate/sign-extend of POImode on ppc target Aaron Sawdey
• Avoiding truncate/sign-extend of POImode on ppc target Aaron Sawdey
• Types are confused in inlining Gary Oblock
• Future debug options: -f* or -g*? David Blaikie
• git hooks update Joseph Myers
• Types are confused in inlining Richard Biener
• irange best practices document Aldy Hernandez
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Erick Ochoa
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Jakub Jelinek
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Richard Biener
• Types are confused in inlining Gary Oblock
• Types are confused in inlining Richard Biener
• #line directives in generated C files Hans-Peter Nilsson
• #line directives in generated C files Hans-Peter Nilsson
• gcc-8-20200903 is now available GCC Administrator
• about souce code location 易会战
• A silly question regarding function types Gary Oblock
• about souce code location Richard Biener
• A silly question regarding function types Richard Biener
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Erick Ochoa
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Jakub Jelinek
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
• #line directives in generated C files Pip Cet
• about souce code location 易会战
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Richard Biener
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Erick Ochoa
• gcc-9-20200904 is now available GCC Administrator
• gcc-10-20200905 is now available GCC Administrator
• A couple GIMPLE questions Gary Oblock
• A couple GIMPLE questions Marc Glisse
• A couple GIMPLE questions Gary Oblock
• A couple GIMPLE questions Gary Oblock
• Function signatures in extern "C". Iain Sandoe
• A couple GIMPLE questions Richard Biener
• Function signatures in extern "C". Jonathan Wakely
• Function signatures in extern "C". Iain Sandoe
• gcc-11-20200906 is now available GCC Administrator
• Function signatures in extern "C". Nathan Sidwell
• about souce code location Martin Sebor
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• Is there a way to look for a tree by its UID? Richard Biener
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Biener
• Function signatures in extern "C". Iain Sandoe
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• Function signatures in extern "C". Jonathan Wakely
• Function signatures in extern "C". Jakub Jelinek
• Function signatures in extern "C". Iain Sandoe
• Function signatures in extern "C". Jonathan Wakely
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Biener
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Sandiford
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Bruce Korb
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Florian Weimer
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Bruce Korb
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Jonathan Wakely
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Bruce Korb
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Jakub Jelinek
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Bruce Korb
• Why was it important to change "FALLTHROUGH" to "fall through"? Jonathan Wakely
• git hooks update Joseph Myers
• subreg vs vec_select Ilya Leoshkevich
• Adding conditional move (movsicc) to MD m
• PowerPC long double Mangling Jonathan Wakely
• JUMP_LABEL returns NULL for the just created jump instruction Anton Youdkevitch
• PowerPC long double Mangling Segher Boessenkool
• irange best practices document Martin Sebor
• PowerPC long double Mangling Thomas Koenig
• PowerPC long double Mangling Segher Boessenkool
• PowerPC long double Mangling Jakub Jelinek
• PowerPC long double Mangling Segher Boessenkool
• subreg vs vec_select Segher Boessenkool
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Segher Boessenkool
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• Function signatures in extern "C". Florian Weimer
• irange best practices document Aldy Hernandez
• JUMP_LABEL returns NULL for the just created jump instruction Richard Sandiford
• JUMP_LABEL returns NULL for the just created jump instruction Anton Youdkevitch
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Sandiford
• subreg vs vec_select Ilya Leoshkevich
• gcc-7-arm vendor branch Pop, Sebastian
• subreg vs vec_select Segher Boessenkool
• gcc-8-20200910 is now available GCC Administrator
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Segher Boessenkool
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Sandiford
• subreg vs vec_select Richard Sandiford
• subreg vs vec_select Ilya Leoshkevich
• subreg vs vec_select Ilya Leoshkevich
• subreg vs vec_select Richard Sandiford
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Earnshaw
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Segher Boessenkool
• Gcc Helen Ames
• subreg vs vec_select Ilya Leoshkevich
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Joel Sherrill
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Florian Weimer
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Joel Sherrill
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Florian Weimer
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Joel Sherrill
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Janne Blomqvist
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Joel Sherrill
• gcc-9-20200911 is now available GCC Administrator
• Dominance information problem Gary Oblock
• Lowest i386 CPU Model with proper C++ atomics Joel Sherrill
• gcc-10-20200912 is now available GCC Administrator
• Enquiry Paul
• Missed optimisation in __udivmoddi4 of libgcc2 Stefan Kanthak
• "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma Chelsea Meyers
• gcc-11-20200913 is now available GCC Administrator
• instrument a funtion on RTL 易会战
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Qian, Jianhua
• Dominance information problem Erick Ochoa
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Earnshaw
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Sandiford
• "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma Nathan Sidwell
• Import license issue Andrew Stubbs
• Dominance information problem Gary Oblock
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Segher Boessenkool
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Richard Sandiford
• A problem with one instruction multiple latencies and pipelines Segher Boessenkool
• List-Unsubscribe: Elliot Cheung
• PowerPC long double Mangling Michael Meissner
• PowerPC long double Mangling Jakub Jelinek
• Question about instrumenting gimple Erick Ochoa
• Gcc Sarah Cokins
• Question about instrumenting gimple Richard Biener
• Question about instrumenting gimple Erick Ochoa
• Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large Bin.Cheng
• desired behavior or missing warning? Ulrich Drepper
• Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large Florian Weimer
• Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large Jakub Jelinek
• Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large Florian Weimer
• gcc-8-20200917 is now available GCC Administrator
• Forbid emiting lwl, lwr, swl and swr in gcc 3.4.1 sathesh edara
• Forbid emiting lwl, lwr, swl and swr in gcc 3.4.1 Jeff Law
• gcc-9-20200918 is now available GCC Administrator
• gcc-10-20200919 is now available GCC Administrator
• gcc-11-20200920 is now available GCC Administrator
• Import license issue Andrew Stubbs
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• desired behavior or missing warning? Florian Weimer
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Florian Weimer
• Import license issue Richard Biener
• Import license issue Andrew Stubbs
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Jonathan Wakely
• [libc-coord] Re: Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> enh
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Jonathan Wakely
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Ville Voutilainen
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Richard Biener
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar
• [libc-coord] Re: Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Florian Weimer
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Jonathan Wakely
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Florian Weimer
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Richard Biener
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/param.h> Florian Weimer
• [RFC] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Alejandro Colomar
• duplicate arm test results? Martin Sebor
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• Otolaryngologists Contacts. abigail richards
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• [libc-coord] Re: Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Rich Felker
• [libc-coord] Re: Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Jonathan Wakely
• [libc-coord] Re: Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Ville Voutilainen
• duplicate arm test results? Martin Sebor
• Wrong optimization from =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98fwprop=E2=80=99_?=pass Jojo R
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Richard Biener
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• duplicate arm test results? Richard Sandiford
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• duplicate arm test results? Jakub Jelinek
• duplicate arm test results? Richard Earnshaw
• duplicate arm test results? Andreas Schwab
• duplicate arm test results? Jakub Jelinek
• duplicate arm test results? Andreas Schwab
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Richard Biener
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• duplicate arm test results? David Edelsohn
• is there a reason why "explicit specialization in non-namespace scope" is still an error in gcc-trunk? Dennis Luehring
• when will scoped template specialization be available in gcc? Dennis Luehring
• when will "scoped template specalization" be available? gcc trunk seems not support it Dennis Luehring
• is there a reason why "explicit specialization in non-namespace scope" is still an error in gcc-trunk? Marek Polacek
• New pseudos in splitters Ilya Leoshkevich
• duplicate arm test results? Martin Sebor
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• duplicate arm test results? Jonathan Wakely
• New pseudos in splitters Jim Wilson
• Can the "ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED" macro be removed if the paramter has being used in fact Hu, Jiangping
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Prathamesh Kulkarni
• LTO slows down calculix by more than 10% on aarch64 Richard Biener
• duplicate arm test results? Christophe Lyon
• Can the "ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED" macro be removed if the paramter has being used in fact Richard Sandiford
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Michael Meissner
• gcc-8-20200924 is now available GCC Administrator
• Can the "ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED" macro be removed if the paramter has being used in fact Hu, Jiangping
• [patch, doc] Update people who can review gfortran patches Thomas Koenig
• [patch, doc] Update people who can review gfortran patches Toon Moene
• On IPA-PTA field sensitivity and pointer expressions Erick Ochoa
• [patch, doc] Update people who can review gfortran patches Tobias Burnus
• On IPA-PTA field sensitivity and pointer expressions Richard Biener
• On IPA-PTA field sensitivity and pointer expressions Erick Ochoa
• On IPA-PTA field sensitivity and pointer expressions Richard Biener
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Jonathan Wakely
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Jonathan Wakely
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Jonathan Wakely
• [PATCH v2] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() and snitems() macros Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v3] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() Alejandro Colomar
• gcc-9-20200925 is now available GCC Administrator
• Wrong optimization from ‘fwprop’ pass Segher Boessenkool
• gcc-10-20200926 is now available GCC Administrator
• The dust seems to have settled from the repository conversion Eric S. Raymond
• Wrong optimization from =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98fwprop=E2=80=99_?=pass Jojo R
• {standard input}:1174: Error: inappropriate arguments for opcode 'mpydu' Rong Chen
• gcc-11-20200927 is now available GCC Administrator
• On IPA PTA field sensitivity and pointer expression (part 2) Erick Ochoa
• On IPA PTA field sensitivity and pointer expression (part 2) Erick Ochoa
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Joseph Myers
• [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() Alejandro Colomar
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Michael Meissner
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Jakub Jelinek
• {standard input}:1174: Error: inappropriate arguments for opcode 'mpydu' Nicolas Pitre
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Joseph Myers
• Git rejecting branch merge Jan Hubicka
• mstackalign vs rbp order in gcc optimization level epilogue/prologue - O2/O3 AJ D
• On IPA PTA field sensitivity and pointer expression (part 2) Erick Ochoa
• Git rejecting branch merge Richard Biener
• [PATCH 0/8] Add some <stdint.h> types Alejandro Colomar
• Git rejecting branch merge Jan Hubicka
• Git rejecting branch merge Richard Biener
• mstackalign vs rbp order in gcc optimization level epilogue/prologue - O2/O3 Eric Botcazou
• [PATCH v2 0/8] Add some <stdint.h> types Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 1/8] system_data_types.7: Add 'intmax_t' Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 2/8] intmax_t.3: New link to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 3/8] system_data_types.7: Add 'uintmax_t' Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 4/8] uintmax_t.3: New link to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 5/8] system_data_types.7: Add intN_t family of types Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 6/8] int8_t.3, int16_t.3, int32_t.3, int64_t.3, intN_t.3: New links to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 7/8] system_data_types.7: Add uintN_t family of types Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 8/8] uint8_t.3, uint16_t.3, uint32_t.3, uint64_t.3, uintN_t.3: New links to system_data_types(7) Alejandro Colomar
• [PATCH v2 0/8] Add some <stdint.h> types Alejandro Colomar
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? 夏 晋
• [PATCH 0/8] Add some <stdint.h> types Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? Richard Biener
• [PATCH 0/8] Add some <stdint.h> types Alejandro Colomar
• 回复: Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? 夏 晋
• Git rejecting branch merge Joseph Myers
• Git rejecting branch merge Joel Brobecker
• Registers used for exception handling on Linux/m68k? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Jonathan Wakely
• Git rejecting branch merge Joseph Myers
• First set of patches to allow changing the long double default were posted: Joseph Myers
• Git rejecting branch merge Joel Brobecker
• Git rejecting branch merge Joel Brobecker
• Git rejecting branch merge Joseph Myers
• Git rejecting branch merge Jan Hubicka
• Git rejecting branch merge Joel Brobecker
• Git rejecting branch merge Jan Hubicka
• Registers used for exception handling on Linux/m68k? Nathan Sidwell
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? Jim Wilson
• New pseudos in splitters Hans-Peter Nilsson
• 回复: Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? 夏 晋
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? Richard Biener
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? Jim Wilson
• Is there a way to tell GCC not to reorder a specific instruction? Jim Wilson
• Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h> Alejandro Colomar

Last message date: Wed Sep 30 20:39:08 GMT 2020
Archived on: Wed Sep 30 20:39:14 GMT 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).