Bug#849754: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.0-1 (original) (raw)

Hello Andreas,

Andreas Henriksson writes:

... Sorry I have not had time to follow up to you. I simply don't have time. Hopefully my previous comments has been of some use to you, but I don't think I can help out anymore.

In my opinion, your length review really helped me a lot to improve the quality of the package, especially it motivated me to review the Python2/Python3-requirements of the target machines and migrate to Python3 earlier than I would have done otherwise, even though it required lengthy burn-in tests afterwards.

I regret, that I could not improve the situation about systemd: there were no responses from systemd list and I did not find ways to do better than now. The current configuration worked in all tests, survived all boots and updates but is not as clean as it should be.

As from my point of view, that lightweight tool might also be useful for other Debian users, I hope, that someone else has the time to continue the review. The whole review state was captured in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849754 and should be good groundwork for the next review.

Best regards, hd

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:00:00AM +0000, halfdog wrote:

Hello Andreas,

I did not hear from you after the last mails, see messages from 04 May 2017 21:59, 23 Jun 2017 05:59. Are you still interested in doing the (quite tricky) review?

I have now also tested the build procedures and the software on Debian Stretch, see today's upload of package to mentors.debian.org.

Best regards, hd

Regards, Andreas Henriksson

Reply to: