Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ... (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Jim Meyering |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ... |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:35:04 +0200 |
address@hidden (Bob Proulx) wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote: > The description of wc's --files0-from is nearly identical > to that of du. I've added an example: > ... > address@hidden > +find . -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | ./wc -L --files=- | tail -n1 > address@hidden example
Here you are using the substring abbreviation --files for --files0-from. Which is fine. But what if someday the --files-from option is added? My preference would be to make the example be unique in that case too and to use at least --files0=- there. ...
Good point. I've spelled it out:
* coreutils.texi (wc invocation): Spell out `--files0-from' in
the example. Suggestion from Bob Proulx.
- FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Jim Meyering, 2006/06/25
- Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/26
* Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Jim Meyering, 2006/06/26
* Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Bob Proulx, 2006/06/26
* Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ...,Jim Meyering <=
* Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/27
* Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Jim Meyering, 2006/06/27
- Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ..., Pádraig Brady, 2006/06/26
- Prev by Date:Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ...
- Next by Date:Re: uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N
- Previous by thread:Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ...
- Next by thread:Re: FYI: wc accepts a new option --files0-from=FILE, ...
- Index(es):