RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Voelker, Bernhard |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:38:49 +0100 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Borkmann wrote: > I think it would rather fit into the coreutils than having it's own > distribution package. What do you think? (Source attached) ... Thanks for the suggestion, but it seems better to do that with some shell and perl:
regardless if it's written in C, shell+perl or any other language, it's still the same question IMHO: should it go into coreutils?
+1 from me (for the C alternative, no deps to shell/perl etc.).
Have a nice day, Berny
- Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Daniel Borkmann, 2010/01/06
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2010/01/06
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Pádraig Brady, 2010/01/06
* RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils,Voelker, Bernhard <=
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2010/01/07
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Daniel Borkmann, 2010/01/07
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, C de-Avillez, 2010/01/07
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Bob Proulx, 2010/01/07
* Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, C de-Avillez, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2010/01/06
- Prev by Date:Re: [PATCH] pr: ensure the page header line is of the required format
- Next by Date:Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
- Previous by thread:Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
- Next by thread:Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
- Index(es):