Re: modify chmod (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Jim Meyering |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: modify chmod |
Date: | Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:35:00 +0100 |
jeff.liu wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your so detailed instruction! And sorry for my later response, I just back from travel.
Could you please check my comments inline? ...
This is the most important point:
> [*] This change is intended to be an optimization. > I am leery of letting an optimization change the semantics of a > program like chmod (which is already very efficient), even if only > for the unusual case of a bind-mounted ACL-possessing non-directory > that resides on an NFS-mounted file system. > Other opinions?
Considering that this optimization is possible only if we agree to degrade (even by only a small amount) chmod's correctness, I am inclined to drop it.
No one disagreed.
- Re: modify chmod, (continued)
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/06
* Re: modify chmod, Jim Meyering, 2010/02/06
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/07
* Re: modify chmod, Jim Meyering, 2010/02/07
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/07
* Re: modify chmod, Jim Meyering, 2010/02/07
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/08
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/08
* Re: modify chmod, Jim Meyering, 2010/02/13
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/21
* Re: modify chmod,Jim Meyering <=
* Message not available
* Re: modify chmod, Jim Meyering, 2010/02/21
* Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/21- Re: modify chmod, jeff.liu, 2010/02/05
- Prev by Date:Re: modify chmod
- Next by Date:Re: modify chmod
- Previous by thread:Re: modify chmod
- Next by thread:Re: modify chmod
- Index(es):