bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Dave Yost |
---|---|
Subject: | bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced |
Date: | Wed, 7 Sep 2011 05:31:26 -0700 |
Much better design. Thanks.
/ from my iPhone 4 /
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
On 09/07/2011 01:55 AM, Dave Yost wrote: > Z% for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 _> for> do echo $x ; done | split --lines=3 _ > pipe> && for x in x?? ; do echo "=== x";catx" ; cat x";catx ; done > === xaa > 1 > 2 > 3 > === xab > 4 > 5 > 6 > === xac > 7 > > In some applications, you would like split to more evenly apportion the > output to the files, like this: > > Z% for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 _> for> do echo $x ; done | split --balanced --lines=3 _ > pipe> && for x in x?? ; do echo "=== x";catx" ; cat x";catx ; done > === xaa > 1 > 2 > 3 > === xab > 4 > 5 > === xac > 6 > 7 >
So you'd like to distribute evenly across the last 2 buckets. It seems like it would be more general to specify the number of buckets instead and let split balance across them all, which is supported recently.
$ seq 7 | split -nr/3; tail x?? ==> xaa <== 1 4 7
==> xab <== 2 5
==> xac <== 3 6
$ seq 7 > 7; split -nl/3 7; tail x?? ==> xaa <== 1 2
==> xab <== 3 4
==> xac <== 5 6 7
Would that suffice?
cheers, Pádraig.
- bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced, Dave Yost, 2011/09/06
- bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced, Bob Proulx, 2011/09/06
- bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced, Pádraig Brady, 2011/09/07
* bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced,Dave Yost <=
- Prev by Date:bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced
- Next by Date:bug#9450: Bug report on 'dirname' : when jokers match several files
- Previous by thread:bug#9455: RFE: split --balanced
- Next by thread:bug#9460: sha256sum
- Index(es):