Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Bernhard Voelker |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs |
Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08š42 +0200 (CEST) |
On September 13, 2012 at 5:47 AM Bob Proulx <address@hidden> wrote:
PƔdraig Brady wrote: > So
sort
should stick to /tmp I think, and not worry > about system implementation details.+1
+1
I think sort should stick to /tmp since that is the behavior most people would expect. There is always TMPDIR for customization.
[...] And by reasonable sized I mean large enough to use for temporary space for video editing. :-)
And this is another point: one won't sort video files. The question is: what data and options must one have so that sort starts growing e.g. >512M ? My guess is that on a home PC such a situation will never happen. One would need huge input files ... which in turn usually are created and processed on bigger servers.
Are there any numbers at hand how many memory sort needs based on the input and the options? ... maybe a short section about this wouldn't harm in the texi file, just as a rule of thumb.
Have a nice day, Berny
- Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs, PƔdraig Brady, 2012/09/12
- Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs,Bernhard Voelker <=
- Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs, Bob Proulx, 2012/09/12
- Prev by Date:Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs
- Next by Date:non-recursive make finished?
- Previous by thread:Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs
- Next by thread:non-recursive make finished?
- Index(es):