Re: 8.21.2-c53c - failure on rm/deep-2 and du/long-from-unreadable (original) (raw)
On 02/19/2013 01:10 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 02/18/2013 11:27 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
So ecrypts limits NAME_MAX. Indeed, running the perl snippet with $dir set to 142 works.
OK I'll take the simple approach and skip those tests in that case. Patch attached.
Hi Padraig,
two places with the same check ... wouldn't it be nice to wrap it into a "require_name_max_" or even use "require_name_max_ 200"?