Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Bernhard Voelker |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file |
Date: | Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:46:49 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
Hi Padraig,
On 04/03/2013 01:02 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Yes I agree that this is a regression associated with the inotify support. I take
tail --follow=descriptor --retry
to mean, Wait for the file to appear initially and follow even if renamed or unlinked.
The problem is that tail_forever_inotify() returns false when the initial open in tail_file() failed. This makes tail exit immediately. Without intense reading of the source, I guess it's not easy to use inotify in such a case. Therefore, falling back to polling seems to be quite okay. The attached patch implement this in a one-liner:
@ -2189,7 +2192,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) is recreated, then we don't recheck any new file when follow_mode == Follow_name */ if (!disable_inotify && (tailable_stdin (F, n_files)
|| any_remote_file (F, n_files)))
|| any_remote_file (F, n_files)
|| !ok)) disable_inotify = true; if (!disable_inotify)
> Furthermore, I find this warning irritating > "warning: --retry is useful mainly when following by name"
I agree. It's not imparting much info, about why that's supported. What we should do is print what tail will do in this case. I propose we do:
if (retry) if (!followmode) warn ("--retry ignored"); else if (followmode == DESC) warn ("--retry only effective for the initial open");
I'd go even one step further, and also remove the latter warning. It fits better into the texinfo documentation. The attached patch includes that, too.
Finally, the patch comes with a new test, NEWS etc.
WDYT?
Have a nice day, Berny
tail-f-retry.patch
Description: Text Data
- tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Noel Morrison, 2013/04/02
- Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/02
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/03
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Pádraig Brady, 2013/04/03
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file,Bernhard Voelker <=
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Pádraig Brady, 2013/04/03
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/17
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Pádraig Brady, 2013/04/17
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Pádraig Brady, 2013/04/18
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/18
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/20
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Pádraig Brady, 2013/04/20
* Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/21
- Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file, Bernhard Voelker, 2013/04/02
- Prev by Date:Coreutils Tips service
- Next by Date:Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file
- Previous by thread:Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file
- Next by thread:Re: tail --retry not re-attempting to open file
- Index(es):