[LLVMdev] [RFC] New StackMap format proposal (StackMap v2) (original) (raw)

Philip Reames listmail at philipreames.com
Tue Jul 14 22:26:36 PDT 2015

+1 sounds entirely reasonable.

On 07/10/2015 09:47 AM, Juergen Ributzka wrote:

Sounds good. I will add that to the StackMap documentation when I update it for v2.

—Juergen

On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov_ _<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:

No, but I've noticed that it is true in practice, and so I think that we should say something about it one way or another. Especially since, in switching to a fixed-size record format, binary searching now becomes relatively easy/fast. Maybe it would be a useful guarantee? Thanks again, Hal

LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150714/10f126b0/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list