[LLVMdev] [Clang] Reasons for lack of -fsingle-precision-constant support? Alternatives? (original) (raw)
ed at modk.it ed at modk.it
Wed Jul 15 09:36:48 PDT 2015
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [Clang] Reasons for lack of -fsingle-precision-constant support? Alternatives?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] runtime pass
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Another approach might be to add a dedicated warning (off by default) which warns or errors on these cases. It also seems like a case where a clang-tidy rewrite rule could help. That would make sense but our tools are so high level we don't even generate compiler errors because there should be none by design: http://modkit.com/vex
We can certainly append the 'f' in our highest level tools but we're working on some tools that are closer to the metal and want to keep things 1:1. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150715/96d184a3/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [Clang] Reasons for lack of -fsingle-precision-constant support? Alternatives?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] runtime pass
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]