[LLVMdev] some superoptimizer results (original) (raw)
John Regehr regehr at cs.utah.edu
Wed Jul 22 10:15:01 PDT 2015
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] Would DosBox benefit from LLVM JIT?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] some superoptimizer results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We (the folks working on Souper) would appreciate any feedback on these IR-level superoptimizer results:
http://blog.regehr.org/extra_files/souper-jul-15.html
My impression is that while there's clearly plenty of material in here that doesn't want to get implemented in an opt pass, there are a number of gems hiding in there that are worth implementing.
Blog post containing additional explanation and caveats is here:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1252
Thanks!
John
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] Would DosBox benefit from LLVM JIT?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] some superoptimizer results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]