[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target? (original) (raw)
Eric Christopher via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 19 15:07:43 PDT 2018
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I agree on RISC-V being pulled out of experimental and into default as well.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:05 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote:
Sounds reasonable to me.
For reference, these are the targets currently marked experimental: ARC, AVR, Nios2, RISCV, WebAssembly. I think RISCV ought to be moved out of the "experimental" list, too. (cc += asb, for comment)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:47 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev <_ _llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Hi All,
WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being actively worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make it a normal target so that it gets tested on a regular basis. (Most recent random breakage is https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web assembly enabled). Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone raises a strong objection here. Thanks! -eric
LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/00f55c47/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]