[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target? (original) (raw)
Eric Christopher via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 19 15:25:51 PDT 2018
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
Eric Christopher via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hi All, > > WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being actively > worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make it a normal target > so that it gets tested on a regular basis. (Most recent random breakage is > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web assembly > enabled).
If we're at the point where people are asking the committer to fix tests for the backend, then the backend should definitely be pulled out of experimental. As is this just leads to needless overhead. That was what caused the motivation, but experimental was supposed to be a short term thing and both of these targets have had ongoing and stable maintenance for years now.
-eric
> Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone raises a > strong objection here. > > Thanks! > > -eric _> ________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/5839c694/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]