[llvm-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here (original) (raw)

Anil Mahmud via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 6 13:03:49 PST 2020

Hello I finished testing RC 10.0.0 on Power PC 64bit Little Endian Red Hat 7.4 machine and have uploaded the binary.

The only failure I detected was when running test-release.sh :

FAIL: LLVM :: tools/llvm-ar/quick-append.test (53100 of 59657) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: tools/llvm-ar/quick-append.test' FAILED ********************

^

This was fixed in f00ab188f4e4214dfbecfdd8968a183e9363cefa on master and cherry-picked to 10.x as e11d70cfe7e2a8537eb774ed1780e9ecd1aa90a0.

The sha1 file is attached.

Thanks, Anil Mahmud.

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:24 AM Rainer Orth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Hi Hans,

> It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. > > Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 > > Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. I've already uploaded Solaris 11.4/AMD64 and Solaris 11.4/SPARCv9 binaries to releases-origin.llvm.org some time ago. While amd64-pc-solaris2.11 results are en par with the LLVM 9.0.0 ones (some failures fixed or xfailed since then) Expected Passes : 54488 Expected Failures : 180 Unsupported Tests : 2409 Unexpected Failures: 23 the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 ones are horrible compared to the 9.0.0 ones: * 9.0.0 final: Expected Passes : 48477 Expected Failures : 180 Unsupported Tests : 1443 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 382 * 10.0.0 rc1: Expected Passes : 47959 Expected Failures : 186 Unsupported Tests : 1615 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 4278 A large number of those only occur for non-SPARC targets (something I usually don't test at all), and even the buildbot is way way better with only 51 unexpected failures. However, that one only does a 1-stage build where errors due to Bug 42535 don't occur. Still, comparing master results on Solaris 11.5/SPARC for all targets between a 1-stage build with gcc 9.1.0 and a 2-stage build shows a similar pattern: * 1-stage: Expected Passes : 53734 Expected Failures : 205 Unsupported Tests : 2495 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 228 * 2-stage: Expected Passes : 45756 Expected Failures : 205 Unsupported Tests : 2495 Unexpected Passes : 2 Unexpected Failures: 7303 I fear this is effectively impossible to analyze let alone fix for the 10.0.0 release. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200206/8cb6907a/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang+llvm-10.0.0-rc1-powerpc64le-linux-rhel-7.4.sha1 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 98 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200206/8cb6907a/attachment.obj>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list