[llvm-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here (original) (raw)

Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 10 07:25:31 PST 2020

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Rainer Orth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Hi Hans, > It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. > > Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1 > > Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available. I've already uploaded Solaris 11.4/AMD64 and Solaris 11.4/SPARCv9 binaries to releases-origin.llvm.org some time ago.

Sorry, I missed this. Did you send an email when you uploaded? Can you please share the SHA1 or similar hashes so I can verify that I get the right ones on my end?

While amd64-pc-solaris2.11 results are en par with the LLVM 9.0.0 ones (some failures fixed or xfailed since then)

Expected Passes : 54488 Expected Failures : 180 Unsupported Tests : 2409 Unexpected Failures: 23 the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 ones are horrible compared to the 9.0.0 ones: * 9.0.0 final: Expected Passes : 48477 Expected Failures : 180 Unsupported Tests : 1443 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 382 * 10.0.0 rc1: Expected Passes : 47959 Expected Failures : 186 Unsupported Tests : 1615 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 4278 A large number of those only occur for non-SPARC targets (something I usually don't test at all), and even the buildbot is way way better with only 51 unexpected failures. However, that one only does a 1-stage build where errors due to Bug 42535 don't occur. Still, comparing master results on Solaris 11.5/SPARC for all targets between a 1-stage build with gcc 9.1.0 and a 2-stage build shows a similar pattern: * 1-stage: Expected Passes : 53734 Expected Failures : 205 Unsupported Tests : 2495 Unexpected Passes : 1 Unexpected Failures: 228 * 2-stage: Expected Passes : 45756 Expected Failures : 205 Unsupported Tests : 2495 Unexpected Passes : 2 Unexpected Failures: 7303 I fear this is effectively impossible to analyze let alone fix for the 10.0.0 release.

Thanks for the report!

I guess since this doesn't seem to be well covered by continuous testing, it's not going to be good :-/

Should we highlight the status of Solaris/Sparc support in the release notes somehow?

Thanks, Hans

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list