[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental (original) (raw)
Chris Lattner via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 14 09:13:37 PST 2020
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so?
-Chris
On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
+better dylanmckay address On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: Hi, There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved. Should we just make it a normal target? Nico
LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200214/721c83dd/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]