[llvm-dev] Why the binary size in trunk are smaller significantly? (original) (raw)
Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 30 09:46:01 PDT 2021
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Why the binary size in trunk are smaller significantly?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Running LIT based testcases outside of llvm source
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The patch that did it might have been trying to solve some unrelated problem, and this was just a side effect. Perhaps a git-bisect could help you isolate the patch?
Thanks, Christopher Tetreault
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of chuanqi.xcq via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 1:47 AM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] [llvm-dev] Why the binary size in trunk are smaller significantly?
Hi all,
I am working on how to reduce the size of the binary produced for coroutine with -g
.
In a private code bases, I find that the binary size produced in llvm-11 is 60M while the size produced in trunk is 51M.
I tried to find the patch who made this change in git log or in phabricator by keywords like reduce
, 'size' or 'binary'. But I find nothing.
May I ask does anyone knows what patch makes the binary size smaller from llvm-11 to now?
thanks, Chuanqi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210330/35151df8/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Why the binary size in trunk are smaller significantly?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Running LIT based testcases outside of llvm source
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]